Literature DB >> 19778685

Extracellular matrix biomaterials for soft tissue repair.

Kevin G Cornwell1, Adam Landsman, Kenneth S James.   

Abstract

The biological and physical augmentation provided by extracellular matrix (ECM) derived implants continues to challenge and refine the conventional wisdom of biomaterials. It is now appreciated that different tissue-processing methodologies can produce ECM devices with characteristic post-implantation responses ranging from the classic foreign body encapsulation of a permanent implant, to one where the implant is degraded and resorbed, to one where the processed ECM implant is populated by local fibroblasts and supporting vasculature to generate a new, metabolically active tissue (gTissue). This article reviews the multiple ECM devices available clinically and highlights the impact of tissue source and processing on physicomechanical properties and host-implant interactions, with regard to surgical applications and clinical considerations.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19778685     DOI: 10.1016/j.cpm.2009.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Podiatr Med Surg        ISSN: 0891-8422            Impact factor:   1.231


  55 in total

1.  The effect of source animal age upon extracellular matrix scaffold properties.

Authors:  Stephen Tottey; Scott A Johnson; Peter M Crapo; Janet E Reing; Li Zhang; Hongbin Jiang; Christopher J Medberry; Brandon Reines; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 2.  Regenerative Scar-Free Skin Wound Healing.

Authors:  Mehri Monavarian; Safaa Kader; Seyedsina Moeinzadeh; Esmaiel Jabbari
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 6.389

3.  Creating neovagina using amnion.

Authors:  S K Kathpalia
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2015-12-31

4.  Assessment of Spirulina-PCL nanofiber for the regeneration of dermal fibroblast layers.

Authors:  Sang-Myung Jung; Dae Seung Kim; Jung Hyeon Ju; Hwa Sung Shin
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 2.416

5.  Successful treatment of complex traumatic and surgical wounds with a foetal bovine dermal matrix.

Authors:  Ernesto Hayn
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Early report of a randomized comparative clinical trial of Strattice™ reconstructive tissue matrix to lightweight synthetic mesh in the repair of inguinal hernias.

Authors:  C F Bellows; P Shadduck; W S Helton; R Martindale; B C Stouch; R Fitzgibbons
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-03-31       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Comparison of biological and alloplastic meshes in ventral incisional hernia repair.

Authors:  A Koscielny; S Widenmayer; T May; J Kalff; P Lingohr
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 8.  Factors influencing the long-term behavior of extracellular matrix-derived scaffolds for musculoskeletal soft tissue repair.

Authors:  Christopher R Rowland; Dianne Little; Farshid Guilak
Journal:  J Long Term Eff Med Implants       Date:  2012

9.  Remodeling characteristics and biomechanical properties of a crosslinked versus a non-crosslinked porcine dermis scaffolds in a porcine model of ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  J A Cavallo; S C Greco; J Liu; M M Frisella; C R Deeken; B D Matthews
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  In vivo degradation of 14C-labeled porcine dermis biologic scaffold.

Authors:  Lisa E Carey; Christopher L Dearth; Scott A Johnson; Ricardo Londono; Christopher J Medberry; Kerry A Daly; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 12.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.