Literature DB >> 22529074

Indications for reverse shoulder replacement: a systematic review.

C D Smith1, P Guyver, T D Bunker.   

Abstract

The outcome of an anatomical shoulder replacement depends on an intact rotator cuff. In 1981 Grammont designed a novel large-head reverse shoulder replacement for patients with cuff deficiency. Such has been the success of this replacement that it has led to a rapid expansion of the indications. We performed a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the functional outcome of each indication for the reverse shoulder replacement. Secondary outcome measures of range of movement, pain scores and complication rates are also presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22529074     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B5.27596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  33 in total

1.  Duocentric® reversed shoulder prosthesis and Personal Fit® templates: innovative strategies to optimize prosthesis positioning and prevent scapular notching.

Authors:  P Trouilloud; M Gonzalvez; P Martz; H Charles; F Handelberg; R W Nyffeler; E Baulot
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-03-31

Review 2.  Reverse polarity shoulder replacement: Current concepts and review of literature.

Authors:  Ling Hong Lee; Aravind Desai
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-07-18

Review 3.  Is there sufficient evidence to support intervention to manage shoulder arthritis?

Authors:  Damian Bull; Andrew Tai Kie; Birgit Hanusch; Rohit Kulkarni; Jonathan Rees; Amar Rangan
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2016-01-08

4.  Future patient demand for shoulder arthroplasty by younger patients: national projections.

Authors:  Eric M Padegimas; Mitchell Maltenfort; Mark D Lazarus; Matthew L Ramsey; Gerald R Williams; Surena Namdari
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Comparative learning curves for early complications in anatomical and reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jcs Beazley; J P Evans; N D Furness; C D Smith
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 6.  Periprosthetic Fractures in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Current Concepts and Advances in Management.

Authors:  Christopher M Brusalis; Samuel A Taylor
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2020-08

7.  [The cogent evidence of surgical documentation].

Authors:  M Schwarze; P W Gaidzik; M Schiltenwolf
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 8.  Reverse shoulder prosthesis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Roberto Postacchini; Stefano Carbone; Gianfranco Canero; Maurizio Ripani; Franco Postacchini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Are Age and Patient Gender Associated With Different Rates and Magnitudes of Clinical Improvement After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Richard J Friedman; Emilie V Cheung; Pierre-Henri Flurin; Thomas Wright; Ryan W Simovitch; Charlotte Bolch; Christopher P Roche; Joseph D Zuckerman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  Legal and psychological considerations for obtaining informed consent for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Craig Blackwood; Jen Dixon; Peter Reilly; Roger J Emery
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2016-06-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.