Literature DB >> 23542591

Crystal structure of a eukaryotic phosphate transporter.

Bjørn P Pedersen1, Hemant Kumar, Andrew B Waight, Aaron J Risenmay, Zygy Roe-Zurz, Bryant H Chau, Avner Schlessinger, Massimiliano Bonomi, William Harries, Andrej Sali, Atul K Johri, Robert M Stroud.   

Abstract

Phosphate is crucial for structural and metabolic needs, including nucleotide and lipid synthesis, signalling and chemical energy storage. Proton-coupled transporters of the major facilitator superfamily (MFS) are essential for phosphate uptake in plants and fungi, and also have a function in sensing external phosphate levels as transceptors. Here we report the 2.9 Å structure of a fungal (Piriformospora indica) high-affinity phosphate transporter, PiPT, in an inward-facing occluded state, with bound phosphate visible in the membrane-buried binding site. The structure indicates both proton and phosphate exit pathways and suggests a modified asymmetrical 'rocker-switch' mechanism of phosphate transport. PiPT is related to several human transporter families, most notably the organic cation and anion transporters of the solute carrier family (SLC22), which are implicated in cancer-drug resistance. We modelled representative cation and anion SLC22 transporters based on the PiPT structure to surmise the structural basis for substrate binding and charge selectivity in this important family. The PiPT structure demonstrates and expands on principles of substrate transport by the MFS transporters and illuminates principles of phosphate uptake in particular.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23542591      PMCID: PMC3678552          DOI: 10.1038/nature12042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


Phosphate is crucial for structural and metabolic needs including nucleotide and lipid synthesis, signalling, and chemical energy storage. Essential for phosphate uptake in plants and fungi are proton-coupled transporters of the Major Facilitator Super-family (MFS), which also have a function in sensing external phosphate levels as transceptors[1-5]. Here we report the 2.9 Å structure of a fungal high affinity phosphate importer, PiPT, in an inward-facing occluded state, with bound phosphate visible in the membrane buried binding site. The structure indicates both proton and phosphate exit pathways and suggests a modified asymmetrical 'Rocker-Switch' mechanism of phosphate transport. PiPT is related to several human transporter families, most notably the organic cation and anion transporters of the Solute Carrier Family (SLC22), which are implicated in cancer-drug resistance[6,7]. We modelled representative cation and anion SLC22 transporters based on the PiPT structure to surmise the structural basis for substrate binding and charge selectivity in this important family. The PiPT structure demonstrates and expands on principles of substrate transport by the MFS transporters and illuminates principles of phosphate uptake in particular. The Major Facilitator Super-family is the largest super-family of secondary active transporters and its diverse members generally function as symporters or antiporters driven by proton or sodium gradients[1]. Structures of eight bacterial MFS transporters have been determined by 2D and 3D crystallography[8-15]. Based on the first of these a 'Rocker-Switch' mechanism was proposed[9,10], suggesting that the symmetry related N- and C-domains rock back and forth as 'banana-shaped' rigid bodies with the central substrate binding site as the pivot point. However, structures of other MFS transporters in the occluded state adopt a compact arrangement of helices around the substrate binding site[8,11,13] and a similarly occluded and compact structure for the Lactose Permease (LacY) has been suggested by molecular dynamics simulations[16], double electron-electron resonance measurements[17] and homology modeling[18]. This indicates that rigid body movements alone are not sufficient to explain translocation in the MFS super-family. Piriformospora indica is an endophytic fungus that colonizes roots of many plant species and promotes growth[19]. We have recently shown the P. indica Phosphate Transporter (PiPT) to be a high affinity phosphate transporter involved in improving phosphate nutrition-levels in the host-plant[20]. PiPT belongs to the Phosphate:H+ Symporter (PHS) family within the Major Facilitator Super-family[1]. It is highly homologous to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae high affinity phosphate transporter, Pho84, and to plant phosphate transporters (Supplementary Fig. 1, Supplementary Table 1). It also shares homology with the human Solute Carrier alpha-group (SLC-α), especially the SLC22 family of human organic anion and cation transports, the SLC2 family of glucose facilitative transporters (GLUTs), and the related Synaptic Vesicle 2 Protein family (Supplementary Table 1)[7,21,22]. The structure of PiPT in complex with its substrate, inorganic phosphate, was determined to 2.9 Å resolution by experimental phasing (Fig. 1) and refined to a free crystallographic R-factor of 25.9% (Supplementary Figs. 2, 3 and 4, Supplementary Table 2). PiPT confirms that the MFS-fold found in bacteria is conserved in eukaryotes. PiPT has 12 transmembrane helices (M1-M12) divided into two homologous domains (N- and C-domain) related by a quasi-twofold symmetry perpendicular to the membrane plane. The structure includes residues 30 to 518 except for 67 residues in the flexible linker between N- and C-domain, predicted from sequence to be disordered. This disordered linker region in PiPT contains no discernible structure in the solved state of the protein, as seen in several other MFS structures[10,13,14]. The linker has no sequence similarity to the four-helix bundle domain observed in the bacterial GLUT homologue XylE[15].
Figure 1

Structure of the High Affinity Phosphate Transporter, PiPT

The structure represents an inward facing occluded state of the phosphate transporter in complex with phosphate. a, Phosphate (shown as spheres) is buried in the membrane at the interface between the N-domain (pale green) and C-domain (blue). Selected residues are shown as sticks. Black bars depicts the approximate location of the membrane. b, The phosphate binding site with yellow dashes indicate possible hydrogen bonds (2.2–3.8 Å distances) to phosphate. Top, The omit mFobs-DFcalc density for phosphate is contoured in orange (4σ). Bottom, The 2mFobs-DFcalc density for phosphate and selected M7 residues is contoured in red (2σ). Other residues are omitted for clarity (Supplementary Fig. 4e).

The overall conformation of PiPT is similar to structures of MFS transporters solved in the occluded state[8,11,13] with the two domains forming a clam-shell like arrangement around a central membrane-buried binding site where the phosphate is bound. To the extracellular side of the binding site a cluster of 3 phenyl residues (F50, F327, F369) (Fig. 1a) block the entry pathway, and the distance from the phosphate site to the extracellular solvent is ~20 Å. The intracellular side of the binding site is also occluded but less so. The helix M4 blocks the cytosolic exit of the phosphate and about ~10 Å separate the phosphate from the solvent (Supplementary Fig. 5). We conclude that the structure captures the protein in an 'inward facing occluded state'[23]. Inorganic phosphate is located between the two domains buried in the middle of the membrane at a location similar to the substrate binding sites in other Major Facilitators[9,13,15] (Fig. 1a). The phosphate is coordinated by Tyr150(M4), Gln177(M5), Trp320(M7), Asp324(M7), Tyr328(M7) and Asn431(M10) as well as by electrostatic interaction from the edge of Phe174(M5) (Fig. 1b). All these residues are fully conserved in the family of Phosphate:H+ symporters. Asp324(M7) coordinates the phosphate with both carboxyl oxygens (Fig. 1b). In Pho84, the corresponding residue (358) is essential for translocation, but initial phosphate-binding is unchanged by its replacement with a asparagine, mimicking a protonated aspartate[24]. This suggests that the aspartate is protonated before engaging the phosphate. The conserved Lys459(M11) has been proposed to be involved in increasing the affinity for phosphate, with point-mutations causing a 2- to 3-fold decrease in affinity2[4]. In the PiPT structure, Lys459 is located next to the binding site with the lysine side-chain amine ~5 Å from the phosphate, too far away to interact with it (Supplementary Fig. 6). In this configuration, Lys459 could either play a role in initial outward facing phosphate binding, or possibly in charge compensation of Asp324 in the empty form of PiPT. A tunnel is visible going from the binding site Tyr150 to the cytosol through the N-domain (Fig. 2, Supplementary Fig. 5). This cytosolic tunnel is substantially smaller (smallest diameter 1.2 Å) than phosphate, going from the binding site, between M4 and M1 towards the bottom of M3 and M6 leading to the cytosolic side. In the structure the cytosolic half of M4 is more flexible than the rest of the protein, as reflected in atomic displacement parameters that are almost twice as high as the surrounding residues (185 Å2 vs. 107 Å2) (Fig. 2a, Supplementary Fig. 4e). Related to this flexibility, a conspicuous glycine-motif with four glycines is located at the middle of the M4 helix, introducing mobility by creating a hinge-region (Supplementary Fig. 7a).
Figure 2

The proposed proton exit pathway

a, All carboxylates are shown as yellow sticks. Four carboxylate side chains in addition to Asp 324 lie in the transmembrane region and all surround the observed tunnel. The tunnel, putatively an proton conductance pathway, is too narrow for phosphate (smallest diameter 1.2 Å). The M4 helix which forms part of the tunnel has high flexibility, indicated by the atomic displacement coded by thickness of the main-chain and a colour-gradient from blue (low disorder) to red (high disorder). The average atomic displacement parameter is 107 Å2 for the protein chain and 185 Å2 for the cytosolic half of the M4 helix (Supplementary Fig. 4f). b, Rotated 90° about the vertical axis the carboxyls line the cytosolic tunnel. c, Electrostatic (−5 to 5 kT/e) surface representation of PiPT (cytosolic side) highlights the negative potential found in the tunnel. The phosphate oxygens are visible via the tunnel.

Proton transfer through the membrane is expected to involve negatively charged residues[12,14,23,25]. There are four negatively charged and conserved residues (Asp45(M1), Asp48(M1), Glu108(M3), Asp149(M4)) in the membrane embedded part of PiPT besides the key-residue Asp324 (Fig. 2a). Asp48 interacts with a buried Arg139 (Supplementary Fig. 6) and all the remaining residues are exposed to the cytosolic tunnel (Fig. 2b). In Pho84, the equivalent of Asp149 (178) has been proposed to be involved in transport at a later stage in the transport cycle than Lys459 (492) or Asp324 (358)[24]. The location of these membrane buried carboxylates implicates the cytosolic tunnel in proton transfer to the cytosol. The structure suggests a tentative model of phosphate-import by Phosphate:H+ symporters (Fig. 3). In the outward open state, Asp324 and other C-domain residues of the central binding site bind phosphate. Protonation of Asp324 lowers the energy barrier for phosphate binding and this ensures coupling between driving force and substrate translocation[23,26]. Also, the aspartate helps to select protonated phosphate (phosphate monobasic) versus fully ionized divalent oxyanions like sulphates[27-29]. Asp324 thus might have a dual role being the proton gatekeeper and ensuring substrate-specificity. As phosphate binds, N-domain residues move in and ensure an optimal fit, thereby repositioning the N-domain to close the entry pathway, forming the outward occluded state. Tyr150 located on the cytosolic side of the M4 glycine-motif interacts with the phosphate in the structure, shifting the flexible region of the M4 helix to form the cytosolic tunnel. Via the tunnel, Asp45, Asp149 and Glu108 create a proton relay from the phosphate binding site to the cytosol that would allow protons to escape, but not permit the passage of phosphate. As positive charge is removed from the binding site along this relay, the binding of phosphate becomes unfavourable and the phosphate exit pathway between the two domains is forced open. In the structure M2 is slightly split apart from M11 at the cytosolic side, and from this conformation, release of the phosphate will require only small rearrangements of M4 and M5 to allow opening of the phosphate exit-pathway lined by the N-domain on one side and the C-domain on the other side (Supplementary Fig. 5). This opening movement seems stalled by 3 salt-bridges formed between the M4-M5 connecting loop and M8 in the structure (Asp159:Arg447, Arg165:Asp381, Arg166:Glu440). The sequential release of protons and then phosphate, with phosphate released between the two domains without major rearrangements is supported by Molecular Dynamics (Supplementary Fig. 8).
Figure 3

Proposed mechanism of phosphate transport

Asp324 is the central proton donor/acceptor of the transporter, found at the centrally located binding site (red) in the inward occluded state described (center). Models of outward open (left) and inward open (right) forms of PiPT were made by structural alignment with the fucose/proton symporter (pdb 3O7Q) and the Lactose permease (pdb 2CFQ) respectively. In the outward open conformation, the protonated form of Asp324 (1) gives preference to phosphate binding (2). Optimal binding of phosphate requires Gln177 and possible other residues to pull the N-domain towards the binding site (3), forming an outward occluded state. Conformational movements (4) opens up the tunnel in the inward occluded state (5). Exposure of the negatively charged cytosolic tunnel pulls a proton from the binding site (6) and the resulting repulsion between phosphate and the now deprotonated binding site (7) allows phosphate to exit to the cytosol between the two domains (8).

The glycine-motif in M4 could help create the suggested proton relay from the binding site to the cytosol and possibly help reposition the N-domain afterwards to allow phosphate to exit. The motif is fully conserved in the PHS family of proton/phosphate transporters (Supplementary Fig. 7a). The multidrug transporter, EmrD[11], and the oxalate/formate antiporter, OxlT[8], both have glycine-rich motifs in M4 resembling those in PiPT (Supplementary Fig. 7b). Similar conserved motifs are found in sugar MFS transporters such as that found in M4 of the human SLC2 family of glucose facilitative transporters (GLUTs) (Supplementary Fig. 7c). In support of the proposed role of this motif in the inward facing conformation, the M4 helix does not appear as mobile in the outward facing occluded state of the bacterial GLUT homologue XylE[15]. Further experiments will verify whether the M4-mobility observed here exists in other MFS families. The PiPT structure is asymmetric in nature, with distinct functionality of the two domains. A similar division is also proposed for LacY, and the Peptide Transporter, PepT(so), where proton translocation is mediated mainly by the C-domain and substrate recognition mainly by the N-domain[9,13,25]. Conversely, substrate recognition in PiPT is attained almost exclusively by the C-domain, while the mechanistic elements that allow translocation of protons and substrate are found in the more flexible N-domain. Our proposed phosphate transporter model is compatible with the MFS Rocker-Switch mechanism, but with some notable modifications. It is consistent with an overall symmetry-related movement of the two domains during translocation, but suggests non-symmetrical intra-domain movements in the N-domain to assist proton translocation involving more complex dynamics. To explore the impact of this structure on human homologues, we constructed homology models of two representative SLC22 members with different charge specificities: The organic cation transporter OCT1 and the organic anion transporter OAT3 (Supplementary Figs. 9 and 10, Supplementary Table 1). Neither model contains a negatively charged residue at the position corresponding to the proton gate-keeper Asp324, in agreement with the observation that SLC22 transporters are not driven by a proton gradient, but more likely by a sodium gradient[7]. The homology models did not allow us to confidently predict the position of a possible sodium binding-site in OCT1 and OAT3, but the PiPT binding site residues on M7, Tyr328 and Trp320, are highly conserved in the SLC22 family, suggesting that members of this family share a similar substrate binding mechanism utilizing this helix. The charge of Lys459 is conserved at the corresponding position in the organic anion transporters (e.g., Arg454 in OAT3), but is reversed in the organic cation transporters (e.g., Asp474 in OCT1), consistent with a pivotal role in substrate charge specificity[30]. Finally, the predicted binding pockets in OCT1 and OAT3 are larger than those in PiPT, in agreement with their broader substrate specificities (Supplementary Fig. 9). In summary, this first structure of a eukaryotic MFS member explains structural/functional relationships of phosphate/proton symport by providing structural evidence for phosphate affinity and specificity and connecting the proton-motive force to phosphate translocation. PiPT provides a strong template for modelling key transporters whose malfunctions in humans are associated with diseases such as cancer and diabetes (e.g., MCT-1 and GLUT4), as well as those that mediate drug absorption, distribution and elimination (e.g., OCT1). These findings provide new insights into charged ligand recognition, binding and release in the context of active membrane transport, a process essential to all living cells.

Methods Summary

The Piriformospora indica high affinity phosphate transporter PiPT (accession number A8N031) was expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and purified using a polyhistidine affinity-tag. Solubilization and purification used dodecyl-beta-D-maltoside followed by n-nonyl-beta-D-glucoside. Crystals were grown by vapour diffusion. Crystallographic data were collected at the Advanced Light Source beamline 8.3.1 and later at Advanced Photon Source beamline 23-ID-B and 23-ID-D. All crystals showed clear signs of hemihedral twinning with a variable twin-fraction from 0.14 to 0.47. Experimental phases were determined using derivative crystals containing K2PtCl6 or (Ta6Br12)Br2. Heavy-atom derived phases were refined and extended to the maximum resolution of the native data by density modification, exploiting histogram mapping, solvent flattening with a solvent content of 73%, two-fold non-crystallographic symmetry and four-fold inter-crystal averaging. Final refinement using data to 2.9 Å resolution produced a structural model with a crystallographic R-factor of 22.2% and a free R-factor of 25.9% (Supplementary Table 2).

Methods

Sample preparation

A 2-micron Saccharomyces cerevisiae expression construct based on p423_GAL1[31] contained nucleotides coding for the Piriformospora indica high affinity phosphate transporter PiPT (accession number A8N031) as well as N-terminal and C-terminal purification-tags as described[32]. Transformed S. cereviciae (strain DSY-5) were grown in a 15 l culture vessel (Biostat C15L Sartorius AG) to high density and induction was done in fed-batch using 40% galactose, and harvested after a 16 hour induction. Harvested yeast were washed in cold water, spun down and resuspended in Lysis-buffer (100 mM Tris pH 7.5, 600 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP), 1.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) before lysis by bead beating using 0.5 mm glass-beads. The homogenate was centrifuged for 25 minutes at 21,600 g, followed by sedimentation of membranes by ultracentrifugation at 185,000 g for 150 minutes. Membrane pellets were resuspended in Membrane-buffer (50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 500 mM NaCl, 20% Glycerol) before being frozen in liquid nitrogen in 3 g aliquots. A normal yield was 20–25 g membrane-pellet from 100 g cells. 3 g membrane were solubilized for 30 minutes in Membrane-buffer using 300 mg n-dodecyl-beta-D-maltoside (DDM) (1:10 (w/w) ratio) in a total volume of 50 ml, after which unsolubilized material was removed by filtration using a 1.2 µm filter. 20 mM imidazole pH 7.5 were added and the solubilized membranes loaded on a pre-equilibrated 1 ml Ni-NTA column (GE Healthcare) at 1 ml/min. After loading, the column was washed with 20 column-volumes of W100-buffer (Membrane buffer supplemented with 100 mM Imidazole pH 7.5, 1 mM TCEP, 10 mM K2HPO4 and 0.05% DDM), and eluded in 5 ml G-buffer (50 mM MES pH 6.5, 200 mM NaCl, 10 mM K2HPO4, 0.5 mM TCEP, 0.2% n-nonyl-beta-D-glucoside (NG)) supplemented with 500 mM Imidazole pH 7.5. To remove purification tags, Bovine Thrombin and HRV 3C Protease were added and the sample dialyzed for 16 hours against 100 ml G-buffer. A normal yield was 10 mg pure PiPT from 3 g of membrane. After dialysis the sample was concentrated using a spin-column (50 kDA cut-off, Amicon) to 500 µl and injected on a size-exclusion column (Superdex 200, GE Healthcare) pre-equilibrated in G-buffer. Peak fractions were concentrated to 10–15 mg/ml before a new dialysis for 16 hours against 100 ml G-buffer. An ultracentrifugation spin (108,000 g, 20 minutes) was applied before crystallization setup.

Crystal Growth

Crystals were grown at 20°C by vapour diffusion in 2+2 µl hanging drops with a reservoir containing 26–29% (w/v) Pentaerythritol propoxylate (5/4 PO/OH), 6–11% Polyethylene glycol 400, 200 mM KCl and 100 mM Sodium Citrate pH 5.5. Hexagonal crystals, with a final size of around 200x200x50 µm, were obtained after typically one week of crystal-growth but would be extremely sporadic in appearing (Supplementary Fig. 2a). Crystals grew in DDM, DM and NG, but morphology and space group changed in NG, and diffraction improved from 4–6 Å to 2.9 Å in the best case. Data were collected at the Advanced Light Source beamline 8.3.1 and later at the Advanced Photon Source beamline 23-ID-B and 23-ID-D. Initial crystals displayed ~10 Å resolution, with severely split spots. Several lines of crystal improvement augmented diffraction properties. Optimized crystals normally diffracted isotropically to 3.2 Å, with a single crystal screened extending to 2.9 Å (Supplementary Fig. 2a). Heavy-atom derivatives were obtained by adding K2PtCl6 or (Ta6Br12)Br2 to the crystals a day prior to flash-cooling, either as salt or as a concentrated, aqueous solution.

Data processing

Data sets were processed using XDS[33] in space group R 3. The data showed clear signs of hemihedral twinning with the twin law (k,h,-l) (Supplementary Table 2). The estimated twin fraction varied from 0.14 to 0.47. The data was detwinned using DETWIN from the CCP4 suite[34].Extensive molecular replacement was attempted essentially as described[35] but was unsuccessful in solving the phase problem. Initial heavy-atom positions of two platinum sites were found by SIRAS in SHELXC/D[36] using detwinned datasets where the estimated twin-fraction was matched between datasets and minimized as much as possible[37]. A single Ta6Br12-cluster site were identified using the initial platinum phases, and experimental MIRAS phases combining two platinum sites and one Ta6Br12-cluster site were calculated to 3.5 Å in SHARP[38] using detwinned datasets (Supplementary Fig. 2b). Gross map-features (e.g. number of discernible α-helices) were significantly improved when experimental phases and maps were calculated from detwinned data as opposed to twinned data. Heavy-atom-derived phases were refined, combined and extended at the maximum resolution of the native data by density modification in DMMULTI[39] exploiting histogram mapping, solvent flattening with a solvent content of 73%, two-fold non-crystallographic symmetry and four-fold inter-crystal averaging. It was helpful to start phase extension at low resolution (10 Å) and very gradually extend (2000 cycles) to the full resolution of the data[35,40]. The resulting electron-density map was of good quality given the low phasing power, providing a continuous trace of the main-chain (Supplementary Table 2, Supplementary Fig. 4). Iterative model building in O[41] and refinement in phenix.refine[42] gradually improved the model and the fit to the experimental map. At later stages model-building was guided by 2mFo-dFc maps using model-phases. Final refinement in phenix.refine used 2-fold torsion-NCS with a refinement strategy of individual sites, individual ADP, occupancy (phosphate only) and TLS (4 groups), against a maximum likelihood (ML) target with reflections in the 69–2.9 Å range of the detwinned dataset (Supplementary Table 2). Refinement could also be done directly against the twinned data using a modified least-squares target ('twin_lsq_f'), but the resulting model was of poorer quality as reflected in worse R-factors and poorer electron-density in the maps for omitted regions. This might be caused by the usage of a least-squares target which disfavours the usage of weak reflections[43]. The final resolution cut-off was based on the behaviour of the crystallographic R-factor (Rwork) in 0.1 Å resolution shells to ensure full utilization of the data. We deemed that an Rwork below 40% meant the data in the given resolution shell was effectively contributing beneficially to the model. The selected cut-off of 2.9 Å based on this approach correlated with an intra-dataset correlation coefficient CC1/2[44] of 25%. The final model yielded a crystallographic R-factor of 22.2% and a free R-factor of 25.9%. MolProbity[45] evaluation of the Ramachandran plot gave 89.5% in favoured regions, and 2.6% outliers as expected for this resolution. The cytosolic tunnel was visualized using Mole[46]. Electrostatic surfaces were calculated using APBS[47]. All structural figures were prepared using PyMOL[48].

Homology Modelling

Alignments between sequences and PiPT were calculated using MUSCLE[49] and PROMALS3D[50], followed by manually refining gaps based on the transmembrane regions observed in the PiPT structure and predicted for other sequences using Phobius[51]. Homology models of OCT1 (SLC22A1) and OAT3 (SLC22A8) were constructed using MODELLER-9v11[52] and assessed using Z-DOPE[53], a normalized atomic distance-dependent statistical potential based on known protein structures. Side-chains of selected residues in the initial OCT1 (Lys214 and Asp474) and OAT3 (Asn450 and Arg454) models were then refined using Scwrl4[54].

Molecular Dynamics

Simulations were performed with GROMACS4[55], using the CHARMM27[56] all-atom force field and the TIP3P[57] water model. Topology and charges for the phosphate ion were generated with ParamChem.org[58]. PiPT was oriented in an implicit lipid bilayer using PPM[59], then immersed in a explicit 1,2-Dimyristoyl-sn-Glycero-3-Phosphocholine (DMPC) lipid bilayer and water using CHARMM-GUI[60]. Periodic boundary conditions and a triclinic box with volume of 557.7 nm3 were used. PipT was simulated a) at neutral pH and b) with two protons added to Asp45 and Asp324. Equilibration was performed by three 10ns long runs, gradually increasing the temperature from 100K to 300K, in the canonical (NVT) ensemble controlled by the Berendsen[61] thermostat. The positions of non-hydrogen atoms of PiPT were restrained by a harmonic potential, with gradually decreasing intensity. A final equilibration step was carried out for 10ns without restraints, in the isothermal–isobaric (NpT) ensemble controlled by the semi-isotropic Berendsen[61] barostat. Each production run was 100ns long, in the NpT ensemble controlled by the Bussi-Donadio-Parrinello[62] thermostat and the semi-isotropic Parrinello-Rahman[63] barostat.
  57 in total

1.  Electrostatics of nanosystems: application to microtubules and the ribosome.

Authors:  N A Baker; D Sept; S Joseph; M J Holst; J A McCammon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Structure and mechanism of the lactose permease of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Jeff Abramson; Irina Smirnova; Vladimir Kasho; Gillian Verner; H Ronald Kaback; So Iwata
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Membrane transporters in drug development.

Authors:  Kathleen M Giacomini; Shiew-Mei Huang; Donald J Tweedie; Leslie Z Benet; Kim L R Brouwer; Xiaoyan Chu; Amber Dahlin; Raymond Evers; Volker Fischer; Kathleen M Hillgren; Keith A Hoffmaster; Toshihisa Ishikawa; Dietrich Keppler; Richard B Kim; Caroline A Lee; Mikko Niemi; Joseph W Polli; Yuichi Sugiyama; Peter W Swaan; Joseph A Ware; Stephen H Wright; Sook Wah Yee; Maciej J Zamek-Gliszczynski; Lei Zhang
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 84.694

4.  High specificity of a phosphate transport protein determined by hydrogen bonds.

Authors:  H Luecke; F A Quiocho
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1990-09-27       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Arginine 454 and lysine 370 are essential for the anion specificity of the organic anion transporter, rOAT3.

Authors:  B Feng; M J Dresser; Y Shu; S J Johns; K M Giacomini
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2001-05-08       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Implementation of the CHARMM Force Field in GROMACS: Analysis of Protein Stability Effects from Correction Maps, Virtual Interaction Sites, and Water Models.

Authors:  Pär Bjelkmar; Per Larsson; Michel A Cuendet; Berk Hess; Erik Lindahl
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 6.006

7.  Sugar binding induces an outward facing conformation of LacY.

Authors:  Irina Smirnova; Vladimir Kasho; Jun-Yong Choe; Christian Altenbach; Wayne L Hubbell; H Ronald Kaback
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Selecting optimum eukaryotic integral membrane proteins for structure determination by rapid expression and solubilization screening.

Authors:  Min Li; Franklin A Hays; Zygy Roe-Zurz; Linda Vuong; Libusha Kelly; Chi-Min Ho; Renée M Robbins; Ursula Pieper; Joseph D O'Connell; Larry J W Miercke; Kathleen M Giacomini; Andrej Sali; Robert M Stroud
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-11-24       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Crystal structure of a prokaryotic homologue of the mammalian oligopeptide-proton symporters, PepT1 and PepT2.

Authors:  Simon Newstead; David Drew; Alexander D Cameron; Vincent L G Postis; Xiaobing Xia; Philip W Fowler; Jean C Ingram; Elisabeth P Carpenter; Mark S P Sansom; Michael J McPherson; Stephen A Baldwin; So Iwata
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography.

Authors:  Vincent B Chen; W Bryan Arendall; Jeffrey J Headd; Daniel A Keedy; Robert M Immormino; Gary J Kapral; Laura W Murray; Jane S Richardson; David C Richardson
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-12-21
View more
  81 in total

Review 1.  Energy coupling mechanisms of MFS transporters.

Authors:  Xuejun C Zhang; Yan Zhao; Jie Heng; Daohua Jiang
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 2.  Understanding transport by the major facilitator superfamily (MFS): structures pave the way.

Authors:  Esben M Quistgaard; Christian Löw; Fatma Guettou; Pär Nordlund
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 94.444

3.  This is about the in and the out.

Authors:  Peter J F Henderson; Stephen A Baldwin
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 15.369

4.  Structure of the YajR transporter suggests a transport mechanism based on the conserved motif A.

Authors:  Daohua Jiang; Yan Zhao; Xianping Wang; Junping Fan; Jie Heng; Xuehui Liu; Wei Feng; Xusheng Kang; Bo Huang; Jianfeng Liu; Xuejun Cai Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Phasing statistics for alpha helical membrane protein structures.

Authors:  Joanne L Parker; Simon Newstead
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Evolutionary mix-and-match with MFS transporters II.

Authors:  M Gregor Madej; H Ronald Kaback
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Homology modeling and site-directed mutagenesis identify amino acid residues underlying the substrate selection mechanism of human monocarboxylate transporters 1 (hMCT1) and 4 (hMCT4).

Authors:  Yuya Futagi; Masaki Kobayashi; Katsuya Narumi; Ayako Furugen; Ken Iseki
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 9.261

8.  Molecular Mechanisms for Species Differences in Organic Anion Transporter 1, OAT1: Implications for Renal Drug Toxicity.

Authors:  Ling Zou; Adrian Stecula; Anshul Gupta; Bhagwat Prasad; Huan-Chieh Chien; Sook Wah Yee; Li Wang; Jashvant D Unadkat; Simone H Stahl; Katherine S Fenner; Kathleen M Giacomini
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 4.436

9.  Phosphate is the third nutrient monitored by TOR in Candida albicans and provides a target for fungal-specific indirect TOR inhibition.

Authors:  Ning-Ning Liu; Peter R Flanagan; Jumei Zeng; Niketa M Jani; Maria E Cardenas; Gary P Moran; Julia R Köhler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Functional architecture of MFS D-glucose transporters.

Authors:  M Gregor Madej; Linfeng Sun; Nieng Yan; H Ronald Kaback
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.