Literature DB >> 23542374

A method of 2D/3D registration of a statistical mouse atlas with a planar X-ray projection and an optical photo.

Hongkai Wang1, David B Stout, Arion F Chatziioannou.   

Abstract

The development of sophisticated and high throughput whole body small animal imaging technologies has created a need for improved image analysis and increased automation. The registration of a digital mouse atlas to individual images is a prerequisite for automated organ segmentation and uptake quantification. This paper presents a fully-automatic method for registering a statistical mouse atlas with individual subjects based on an anterior-posterior X-ray projection and a lateral optical photo of the mouse silhouette. The mouse atlas was trained as a statistical shape model based on 83 organ-segmented micro-CT images. For registration, a hierarchical approach is applied which first registers high contrast organs, and then estimates low contrast organs based on the registered high contrast organs. To register the high contrast organs, a 2D-registration-back-projection strategy is used that deforms the 3D atlas based on the 2D registrations of the atlas projections. For validation, this method was evaluated using 55 subjects of preclinical mouse studies. The results showed that this method can compensate for moderate variations of animal postures and organ anatomy. Two different metrics, the Dice coefficient and the average surface distance, were used to assess the registration accuracy of major organs. The Dice coefficients vary from 0.31 ± 0.16 for the spleen to 0.88 ± 0.03 for the whole body, and the average surface distance varies from 0.54 ± 0.06 mm for the lungs to 0.85 ± 0.10mm for the skin. The method was compared with a direct 3D deformation optimization (without 2D-registration-back-projection) and a single-subject atlas registration (instead of using the statistical atlas). The comparison revealed that the 2D-registration-back-projection strategy significantly improved the registration accuracy, and the use of the statistical mouse atlas led to more plausible organ shapes than the single-subject atlas. This method was also tested with shoulder xenograft tumor-bearing mice, and the results showed that the registration accuracy of most organs was not significantly affected by the presence of shoulder tumors, except for the lungs and the spleen.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23542374      PMCID: PMC3667217          DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2013.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Anal        ISSN: 1361-8415            Impact factor:   8.545


  41 in total

1.  3D/2D registration and segmentation of scoliotic vertebrae using statistical models.

Authors:  Said Benameur; Max Mignotte; Stefan Parent; Hubert Labelle; Wafa Skalli; Jacques de Guise
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.790

2.  Automated registration of whole-body follow-up MicroCT data of mice.

Authors:  Martin Baiker; Marius Staring; Clemens W G M Löwik; Johan H C Reiber; Boudewijn P F Lelieveldt
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2011

3.  Digimouse: a 3D whole body mouse atlas from CT and cryosection data.

Authors:  Belma Dogdas; David Stout; Arion F Chatziioannou; Richard M Leahy
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  A 2D/3D correspondence building method for reconstruction of a patient-specific 3D bone surface model using point distribution models and calibrated X-ray images.

Authors:  Guoyan Zheng; Sebastian Gollmer; Steffen Schumann; Xiao Dong; Thomas Feilkas; Miguel A González Ballester
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 8.545

5.  Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information.

Authors:  W M Wells; P Viola; H Atsumi; S Nakajima; R Kikinis
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  2D-3D shape reconstruction of the distal femur from stereo X-ray imaging using statistical shape models.

Authors:  N Baka; B L Kaptein; M de Bruijne; T van Walsum; J E Giphart; W J Niessen; B P F Lelieveldt
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 8.545

7.  Morphologic phenotyping with MR microscopy: the visible mouse.

Authors:  G Allan Johnson; Gary P Cofer; Sally L Gewalt; Laurence W Hedlund
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Articulated whole-body atlases for small animal image analysis: construction and applications.

Authors:  Artem Khmelinskii; Martin Baiker; Eric L Kaijzel; Josette Chen; Johan H C Reiber; Boudewijn P F Lelieveldt
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  Multimodality rodent imaging chambers for use under barrier conditions with gas anesthesia.

Authors:  Chris Suckow; Claudia Kuntner; Patrick Chow; Robert Silverman; Arion Chatziioannou; David Stout
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  3D reconstruction of the human rib cage from 2D projection images using a statistical shape model.

Authors:  Jalda Dworzak; Hans Lamecker; Jens von Berg; Tobias Klinder; Cristian Lorenz; Dagmar Kainmüller; Heiko Seim; Hans-Christian Hege; Stefan Zachow
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2009-07-26       Impact factor: 2.924

View more
  5 in total

1.  A hybrid registration-based method for whole-body micro-CT mice images.

Authors:  Xiaochao Qu; Xueyuan Gao; Xianhui Xu; Shouping Zhu; Jimin Liang
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  A deformable atlas of the laboratory mouse.

Authors:  Hongkai Wang; David B Stout; Arion F Chatziioannou
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Robust 3D-2D image registration: application to spine interventions and vertebral labeling in the presence of anatomical deformation.

Authors:  Yoshito Otake; Adam S Wang; J Webster Stayman; Ali Uneri; Gerhard Kleinszig; Sebastian Vogt; A Jay Khanna; Ziya L Gokaslan; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Multimodal Correlative Preclinical Whole Body Imaging and Segmentation.

Authors:  Ayelet Akselrod-Ballin; Hagit Dafni; Yoseph Addadi; Inbal Biton; Reut Avni; Yafit Brenner; Michal Neeman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Automated quantification of bioluminescence images.

Authors:  Alexander D Klose; Neal Paragas
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 14.919

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.