Literature DB >> 2354137

Detecting early glaucomatous field defects with the size I stimulus and Statpac.

A H Zalta1, J C Burchfield.   

Abstract

The influence of stimulus size and normal database on the detection of visual field defects in automated static threshold perimetry (Humphrey Field Analyzer) was investigated in 82 eyes having a diagnosis of normal, glaucoma suspect, or early glaucoma. Using a mathematically derived 'normal' database, which assumes constantly decreasing threshold sensitivities with increasing eccentricity, the size I stimulus showed significantly greater sensitivity than the size III stimulus for detecting small, shallow scotomata in the central visual field. The use of Statpac, which contains an empirically derived, age-related normal database, increased the sensitivity significantly over that of the size III stimulus (with its mathematical model), and to a degree similar to that of the size I stimulus. The results obtained with the size I stimulus were reproducible and independent of the patient's age. This study suggests a potential role for the size I stimulus in evaluating eyes having or at risk of developing early glaucomatous field loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2354137      PMCID: PMC1042101          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.74.5.289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  5 in total

1.  Normal variability of static perimetric threshold values across the central visual field.

Authors:  A Heijl; G Lindgren; J Olsson
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-11

2.  The use of different-sized stimuli in automated perimetry.

Authors:  J T Wilensky; J R Mermelstein; H G Siegel
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-06-15       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Problems related to the design of automatic perimeters.

Authors:  F Fankhauser
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1979-09-17       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Effects of target size and eccentricity on visual detection and resolution.

Authors:  C A Johnson; J L Keltner; F Balestrery
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  [Computer perimetry of glaucomatous visual field defects at different stimulus sizes (author's transl)].

Authors:  E Gramer; D Kontić; G K Krieglstein
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 3.250

  5 in total
  7 in total

1.  The influence of stimulus parameters on the visual field indices by automated projection perimetry.

Authors:  M Dengler-Harles; J M Wild; M D Cole; E C O'Neill
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Detection of visual field defects in pre-perimetric glaucoma using fundus-oriented small-target perimetry.

Authors:  Yusuke Nakatani; Shinji Ohkubo; Tomomi Higashide; Aiko Iwase; Kazutaka Kani; Kazuhisa Sugiyama
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Goldmann V Standard Automated Perimetry Underestimates Central Visual Sensitivity in Glaucomatous Eyes with Increased Axial Length.

Authors:  Mieko Yanagisawa; Hiroshi Murata; Masato Matsuura; Yuri Fujino; Kazunori Hirasawa; Ryo Asaoka
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 3.283

4.  How Many Subjects are Needed for a Visual Field Normative Database? A Comparison of Ground Truth and Bootstrapped Statistics.

Authors:  Jack Phu; Bang V Bui; Michael Kalloniatis; Sieu K Khuu
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.283

5.  Comparison of defect depths for sinusoidal and circular perimetric stimuli in patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  William H Swanson; Brett J King
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Comparison of size modulation and conventional standard automated perimetry with the 24-2 test protocol in glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Kazunori Hirasawa; Nobuyuki Shoji; Masayuki Kasahara; Kazuhiro Matsumura; Kimiya Shimizu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Reducing Spatial Uncertainty Through Attentional Cueing Improves Contrast Sensitivity in Regions of the Visual Field With Glaucomatous Defects.

Authors:  Jack Phu; Michael Kalloniatis; Sieu K Khuu
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.283

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.