Literature DB >> 3717256

The use of different-sized stimuli in automated perimetry.

J T Wilensky, J R Mermelstein, H G Siegel.   

Abstract

Eighteen patients with glaucoma who failed to respond (0 dB) to maximum intensity (1,000 apostilbs) No. 3 (4 mm2) stimuli during threshold static perimetry performed with an Octopus automated perimeter were retested using the same test program with No. 5 (64 mm2) stimuli. All responded to the larger stimulus at the 5-dB (315 apostilbs) level or higher in at least three previously undetected locations. Ten of the 18 patients responded in at least 80% of the locations they were unable to detect with smaller stimulus. After four patients were tested twice with the No. 5 stimulus the improvement in response was confirmed. The use of the larger-sized stimulus permitted us to measure visual function in areas that had been considered absolute scotomas with the standard-sized stimulus. In this way, we can monitor changes that may occur in these areas in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3717256     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9394(86)90775-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  15 in total

1.  Use of a central 10 degrees field and size V stimulus to evaluate and monitor small central islands of vision in end stage glaucoma.

Authors:  A H Zalta
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Ganglion cell loss and age-related visual loss: a cortical pooling analysis.

Authors:  Pauline M Pearson; Laura A Schmidt; Emily Ly-Schroeder; William H Swanson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Linearity can account for the similarity among conventional, frequency-doubling, and gabor-based perimetric tests in the glaucomatous macula.

Authors:  Hao Sun; Mitchell W Dul; William H Swanson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  The influence of stimulus parameters on the visual field indices by automated projection perimetry.

Authors:  M Dengler-Harles; J M Wild; M D Cole; E C O'Neill
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Evaluation of a two-stage neural model of glaucomatous defect: an approach to reduce test-retest variability.

Authors:  Fei Pan; William H Swanson; Mitchell W Dul
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Detecting early glaucomatous field defects with the size I stimulus and Statpac.

Authors:  A H Zalta; J C Burchfield
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Rapid pupil-based assessment of glaucomatous damage.

Authors:  Yanjun Chen; Harry J Wyatt; William H Swanson; Mitchell W Dul
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Development and evaluation of a contrast sensitivity perimetry test for patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  Aliya Hot; Mitchell W Dul; William H Swanson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-03-31       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  The Effect of Stimulus Size on the Reliable Stimulus Range of Perimetry.

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner; Shaban Demirel; Deborah Goren; Steven L Mansberger; William H Swanson
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.283

10.  Pattern Recognition Analysis Reveals Unique Contrast Sensitivity Isocontours Using Static Perimetry Thresholds Across the Visual Field.

Authors:  Jack Phu; Sieu K Khuu; Lisa Nivison-Smith; Barbara Zangerl; Agnes Yiu Jeung Choi; Bryan W Jones; Rebecca L Pfeiffer; Robert E Marc; Michael Kalloniatis
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.