PURPOSE: To compare the optical quality of implantable Collamer lens (ICL) with and without central hole (Hole ICL and conventional ICL) at different degrees of decentering. DESIGN: Experimental laboratory investigation. METHODS: Wavefront aberrations of the -3, -6, and -12 diopter (D) V4b and -3, -6, and -12 D V4c ICLs were measured in 3 conditions-centered and decentered 0.3 and 0.6 mm-at 3-mm and 4.5-mm pupils. The root mean square of total higher order aberrations, trefoil, coma, tetrafoil, secondary astigmatism, and spherical aberration were evaluated. In addition, point spread function and simulated retinal images of ICLs were calculated from the wavefront aberrations for each ICL and all conditions of decentering at 4.5-mm pupil. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in any Zernike coefficient terms evaluated were found between conventional and Hole ICLs for any ICL powers and pupils evaluated (P > .05). We could not appreciate differences in the point spread function images and in simulated retinal images. Regarding the effect of the ICL decentration, coma aberration increased significantly with ICL decentration (P < .05), although these differences were not visible in the point spread function images and simulated retinal images. The ICL decentration was affected in the same manner on the conventional and Hole ICLs. CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes showed good and comparable optical quality of the conventional and Hole ICLs for all ICL powers evaluated. Despite that coma aberration increased with ICL decentering, these values were clinically negligible and did not have a significant effect on the simulated visual performance.
PURPOSE: To compare the optical quality of implantable Collamer lens (ICL) with and without central hole (Hole ICL and conventional ICL) at different degrees of decentering. DESIGN: Experimental laboratory investigation. METHODS: Wavefront aberrations of the -3, -6, and -12 diopter (D) V4b and -3, -6, and -12 D V4c ICLs were measured in 3 conditions-centered and decentered 0.3 and 0.6 mm-at 3-mm and 4.5-mm pupils. The root mean square of total higher order aberrations, trefoil, coma, tetrafoil, secondary astigmatism, and spherical aberration were evaluated. In addition, point spread function and simulated retinal images of ICLs were calculated from the wavefront aberrations for each ICL and all conditions of decentering at 4.5-mm pupil. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in any Zernike coefficient terms evaluated were found between conventional and Hole ICLs for any ICL powers and pupils evaluated (P > .05). We could not appreciate differences in the point spread function images and in simulated retinal images. Regarding the effect of the ICL decentration, coma aberration increased significantly with ICL decentration (P < .05), although these differences were not visible in the point spread function images and simulated retinal images. The ICL decentration was affected in the same manner on the conventional and Hole ICLs. CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes showed good and comparable optical quality of the conventional and Hole ICLs for all ICL powers evaluated. Despite that coma aberration increased with ICL decentering, these values were clinically negligible and did not have a significant effect on the simulated visual performance.