Literature DB >> 23538383

Teaching Object-Picture Matching to Improve Concordance between Object and Picture Preferences for Individuals with Developmental Disabilities: Pilot Study.

Duong Minh Nguyen1, C T Yu, Toby L Martin, Pamela Fregeau, Cheryl Pogorzelec, Garry L Martin.   

Abstract

We evaluated teaching object-picture matching to improve concordance between preference assessments using objects and pictures of the same objects. Three participants with developmental disabilities who showed high and low preferences during assessments with objects but not with pictures were taught object-picture matching tasks unrelated to the items used during preference assessments. Training was evaluated in a modified multiple-baseline design and preference assessments with objects and pictures were repeated after training each object-picture matching task. Two participants showed improved concordance after mastering two and three training tasks, respectively. The third participant did not show concordance between object and picture preference assessments after mastering two tasks and after additional training. Our findings suggested that object-picture matching might be a prerequisite for picture preference assessments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Object to picture matching; longitudinal study; picture preference assessment ability; teaching

Year:  2009        PMID: 23538383      PMCID: PMC3607582     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dev Disabl        ISSN: 1188-9136


  7 in total

1.  A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.

Authors:  W Fisher; C C Piazza; L G Bowman; L P Hagopian; J C Owens; I Slevin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1992

2.  Multiple-probe technique: a variation on the multiple baseline.

Authors:  R D Horner; D M Baer
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1978

3.  Assessing object-to-picture and picture-to-object matching as prerequisite skills for pictorial preference assessments.

Authors:  Theresa M Clevenger; Richard B Graff
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2005

4.  Predicting the relative efficacy of verbal, pictorial, and tangible stimuli for assessing preferences of leisure activities.

Authors:  Cecile de Vries; C T Yu; Gina Sakko; Kirsten M Wirth; Kerri L Walters; Carole Marion; Garry L Martin
Journal:  Am J Ment Retard       Date:  2005-03

5.  The Assessment of Basic Learning Abilities (ABLA) test predicts the relative efficacy of task preferences for persons with developmental disabilities.

Authors:  H S Reyer; P Sturmey
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  2006-06

6.  Predicting the relative efficacy of three presentation methods for assessing preferences of persons with developmental disabilities.

Authors:  Carole Conyers; Adrienne Doole; Tricia Vause; Shayla Harapiak; Dickie C T Yu; Garry L Martin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2002

7.  Discrimination Skills Predict Effective Preference Assessment Methods for Adults with Developmental Disabilities.

Authors:  May S H Lee; Duong Nguyen; C T Yu; Jennifer R Thorsteinsson; Toby L Martin; Garry L Martin
Journal:  Educ Train Dev Disabil       Date:  2008-09
  7 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Single-case experimental designs: a systematic review of published research and current standards.

Authors:  Justin D Smith
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2012-07-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.