Literature DB >> 23536743

Discrimination Skills Predict Effective Preference Assessment Methods for Adults with Developmental Disabilities.

May S H Lee1, Duong Nguyen, C T Yu, Jennifer R Thorsteinsson, Toby L Martin, Garry L Martin.   

Abstract

We examined the relationship between three discrimination skills (visual, visual matching-to-sample, and auditory-visual) and four stimulus modalities (object, picture, spoken, and video) in assessing preferences of leisure activities for 7 adults with developmental disabilities. Three discrimination skills were measured using the Assessment of Basic Learning Abilities Test. Three participants mastered a visual discrimination task, but not visual matching-to-sample and auditory-visual discriminations; two participants mastered visual and visual matching-to-sample discriminations, but not auditory-visual discrimination, and two participants showed all three discriminations. The most and least preferred activities, identified through paired-stimulus preference assessment using objects, were presented to each participant in each of the four modalities using a reversal design. The results showed that (1) participants with visual discrimination alone showed a preference for their preferred activities in the object modality only; (2) those with visual and visual matching-to-sample discriminations, but not auditory-visual discrimination, showed a preference for their preferred activities in the object but not in the spoken modality, and mixed results in the pictorial and video modalities; and (3) those with all three discriminations showed a preference for their preferred activities in all four modalities. These results provide partial replications of previous findings on the relationship between discriminations and object, pictorial, and spoken modalities, and extend previous research to include video stimuli.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 23536743      PMCID: PMC3607581     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Educ Train Dev Disabil        ISSN: 1547-0350


  9 in total

1.  A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.

Authors:  W Fisher; C C Piazza; L G Bowman; L P Hagopian; J C Owens; I Slevin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1992

2.  Assessing object-to-picture and picture-to-object matching as prerequisite skills for pictorial preference assessments.

Authors:  Theresa M Clevenger; Richard B Graff
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2005

3.  Using a choice assessment to predict reinforcer effectiveness.

Authors:  C C Piazza; W W Fisher; L P Hagopian; L G Bowman; L Toole
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1996

4.  Identifying reinforcers for persons with profound handicaps: staff opinion versus systematic assessment of preferences.

Authors:  C W Green; D H Reid; L K White; R C Halford; D P Brittain; S M Gardner
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1988

Review 5.  Quality of life in applied research: a review and analysis of empirical measures.

Authors:  C Hughes; B Hwang; J H Kim; L T Eisenman; D J Killian
Journal:  Am J Ment Retard       Date:  1995-05

6.  Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals.

Authors:  G M Pace; M T Ivancic; G L Edwards; B A Iwata; T J Page
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1985

7.  Predicting the relative efficacy of verbal, pictorial, and tangible stimuli for assessing preferences of leisure activities.

Authors:  Cecile de Vries; C T Yu; Gina Sakko; Kirsten M Wirth; Kerri L Walters; Carole Marion; Garry L Martin
Journal:  Am J Ment Retard       Date:  2005-03

8.  The Assessment of Basic Learning Abilities (ABLA) test predicts the relative efficacy of task preferences for persons with developmental disabilities.

Authors:  H S Reyer; P Sturmey
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  2006-06

9.  Predicting the relative efficacy of three presentation methods for assessing preferences of persons with developmental disabilities.

Authors:  Carole Conyers; Adrienne Doole; Tricia Vause; Shayla Harapiak; Dickie C T Yu; Garry L Martin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2002
  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Teaching Object-Picture Matching to Improve Concordance between Object and Picture Preferences for Individuals with Developmental Disabilities: Pilot Study.

Authors:  Duong Minh Nguyen; C T Yu; Toby L Martin; Pamela Fregeau; Cheryl Pogorzelec; Garry L Martin
Journal:  J Dev Disabl       Date:  2009
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.