Literature DB >> 23536441

Predator-prey body size relationships when predators can consume prey larger than themselves.

Takefumi Nakazawa1, Shin-Ya Ohba, Masayuki Ushio.   

Abstract

As predator-prey interactions are inherently size-dependent, predator and prey body sizes are key to understanding their feeding relationships. To describe predator-prey size relationships (PPSRs) when predators can consume prey larger than themselves, we conducted field observations targeting three aquatic hemipteran bugs, and assessed their body masses and those of their prey for each hunting event. The data revealed that their PPSR varied with predator size and species identity, although the use of the averaged sizes masked these effects. Specifically, two predators had slightly decreased predator-prey mass ratios (PPMRs) during growth, whereas the other predator specialized on particular sizes of prey, thereby showing a clear positive size-PPMR relationship. We discussed how these patterns could be different from fish predators swallowing smaller prey whole.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23536441      PMCID: PMC3645026          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.1193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  8 in total

1.  Phylogenetic signal in predator-prey body-size relationships.

Authors:  Russell E Naisbit; Patrik Kehrli; Rudolf P Rohr; Louis-Félix Bersier
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.499

2.  Global patterns in predator-prey size relationships reveal size dependency of trophic transfer efficiency.

Authors:  Carolyn Barnes; David Maxwell; Daniel C Reuman; Simon Jennings
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.499

3.  Stepping in Elton's footprints: a general scaling model for body masses and trophic levels across ecosystems.

Authors:  Jens O Riede; Ulrich Brose; Bo Ebenman; Ute Jacob; Ross Thompson; Colin R Townsend; Tomas Jonsson
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2010-12-27       Impact factor: 9.492

4.  The Serengeti food web: empirical quantification and analysis of topological changes under increasing human impact.

Authors:  Sara N de Visser; Bernd P Freymann; Han Olff
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 5.091

5.  Body sizes of hosts and parasitoids in individual feeding relationships.

Authors:  Joel E Cohen; Tomas Jonsson; Christine B Müller; H C J Godfray; Van M Savage
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Consumer-resource body-size relationships in natural food webs.

Authors:  Ulrich Brose; Tomas Jonsson; Eric L Berlow; Philip Warren; Carolin Banasek-Richter; Louis-Félix Bersier; Julia L Blanchard; Thomas Brey; Stephen R Carpenter; Marie-France Cattin Blandenier; Lara Cushing; Hassan Ali Dawah; Tony Dell; Francois Edwards; Sarah Harper-Smith; Ute Jacob; Mark E Ledger; Neo D Martinez; Jane Memmott; Katja Mintenbeck; John K Pinnegar; Björn C Rall; Thomas S Rayner; Daniel C Reuman; Liliane Ruess; Werner Ulrich; Richard J Williams; Guy Woodward; Joel E Cohen
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.499

Review 7.  All wet or dried up? Real differences between aquatic and terrestrial food webs.

Authors:  Jonathan B Shurin; Daniel S Gruner; Helmut Hillebrand
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Predator-prey size relationships in an African large-mammal food web.

Authors:  Norman Owen-Smith; M G L Mills
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.091

  8 in total
  8 in total

1.  Body size mediates the relationship between spider (Arachnida: Araneae) assemblage composition and prey consumption rate: results of a mesocosm experiment in the Yukon, Canada.

Authors:  Shaun Turney; Chris M Buddle
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Resolving the roles of body size and species identity in driving functional diversity.

Authors:  Volker H W Rudolf; Nick L Rasmussen; Christopher J Dibble; Benjamin G Van Allen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  David and Goliath: potent venom of an ant-eating spider (Araneae) enables capture of a giant prey.

Authors:  Stano Pekár; Onřej Šedo; Eva Líznarová; Stanislav Korenko; Zdeněk Zdráhal
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2014-05-31

4.  Soil microarthropods and their relationship to higher trophic levels in the Pedregal de San Angel Ecological Reserve, Mexico.

Authors:  Alicia Callejas-Chavero; Gabriela Castaño-Meneses; María Razo-González; Daniela Pérez-Velázquez; José G Palacios-Vargas; Arturo Flores-Martínez
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 1.857

5.  Short-term exposure to predation affects body elemental composition, climbing speed and survival ability in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Indrikis Krams; Sarah Eichler Inwood; Giedrius Trakimas; Ronalds Krams; Gordon M Burghardt; David M Butler; Severi Luoto; Tatjana Krama
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  No ontogenetic shift in the realised trophic niche but in Batesian mimicry in an ant-eating spider.

Authors:  S Pekár; L Petráková Dušátková; C R Haddad
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Body size, swimming speed, or thermal sensitivity? Predator-imposed selection on amphibian larvae.

Authors:  Lumír Gvoždík; Radovan Smolinský
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  The role of a water bug, Sigara striata, in freshwater food webs.

Authors:  Jan Klecka
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 2.984

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.