Literature DB >> 17089649

Consumer-resource body-size relationships in natural food webs.

Ulrich Brose1, Tomas Jonsson, Eric L Berlow, Philip Warren, Carolin Banasek-Richter, Louis-Félix Bersier, Julia L Blanchard, Thomas Brey, Stephen R Carpenter, Marie-France Cattin Blandenier, Lara Cushing, Hassan Ali Dawah, Tony Dell, Francois Edwards, Sarah Harper-Smith, Ute Jacob, Mark E Ledger, Neo D Martinez, Jane Memmott, Katja Mintenbeck, John K Pinnegar, Björn C Rall, Thomas S Rayner, Daniel C Reuman, Liliane Ruess, Werner Ulrich, Richard J Williams, Guy Woodward, Joel E Cohen.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that differences in body size between consumer and resource species may have important implications for interaction strengths, population dynamics, and eventually food web structure, function, and evolution. Still, the general distribution of consumer-'resource body-size ratios in real ecosystems, and whether they vary systematically among habitats or broad taxonomic groups, is poorly understood. Using a unique global database on consumer and resource body sizes, we show that the mean body-size ratios of aquatic herbivorous and detritivorous consumers are several orders of magnitude larger than those of carnivorous predators. Carnivorous predator-prey body-size ratios vary across different habitats and predator and prey types (invertebrates, ectotherm, and endotherm vertebrates). Predator-prey body-size ratios are on average significantly higher (1) in freshwater habitats than in marine or terrestrial habitats, (2) for vertebrate than for invertebrate predators, and (3) for invertebrate than for ectotherm vertebrate prey. If recent studies that relate body-size ratios to interaction strengths are general, our results suggest that mean consumer-resource interaction strengths may vary systematically across different habitat categories and consumer types.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17089649     DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2411:cbrinf]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  113 in total

1.  Dimensionality of consumer search space drives trophic interaction strengths.

Authors:  Samraat Pawar; Anthony I Dell; Van M Savage
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Predicting the effects of temperature on food web connectance.

Authors:  Owen L Petchey; Ulrich Brose; Björn C Rall
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  How phylogeny shapes the taxonomic and functional structure of plant-insect networks.

Authors:  Sébastien Ibanez; Fabien Arène; Sébastien Lavergne
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Utilization of prey from the decomposer system by generalist predators of grassland.

Authors:  Katja Oelbermann; Reinhard Langel; Stefan Scheu
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Consumer versus resource control of producer diversity depends on ecosystem type and producer community structure.

Authors:  Helmut Hillebrand; Daniel S Gruner; Elizabeth T Borer; Matthew E S Bracken; Elsa E Cleland; James J Elser; W Stanley Harpole; Jacqueline T Ngai; Eric W Seabloom; Jonathan B Shurin; Jennifer E Smith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The "Goldilocks factor" in food webs.

Authors:  Eric L Berlow; Ulrich Brose; Neo D Martinez
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-03-11       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Complex food webs prevent competitive exclusion among producer species.

Authors:  Ulrich Brose
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Simple prediction of interaction strengths in complex food webs.

Authors:  Eric L Berlow; Jennifer A Dunne; Neo D Martinez; Philip B Stark; Richard J Williams; Ulrich Brose
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-29       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Tree diversity promotes functional dissimilarity and maintains functional richness despite species loss in predator assemblages.

Authors:  Andreas Schuldt; Helge Bruelheide; Walter Durka; Stefan G Michalski; Oliver Purschke; Thorsten Assmann
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Soil resource supply influences faunal size-specific distributions in natural food webs.

Authors:  Christian Mulder; Henri A Den Hollander; J Arie Vonk; Axel G Rossberg; Gerard A J M Jagers op Akkerhuis; Gregor W Yeates
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2009-05-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.