Literature DB >> 23536198

Effects of single and combined cell treatments based on low pH and high concentrations of ethanol on the growth and fermentation of Dekkera bruxellensis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Ana Paula Guarnieri Bassi1, Jéssica Carolina Gomes da Silva, Vanda Renata Reis, Sandra Regina Ceccato-Antonini.   

Abstract

The alcoholic fermentation in Brazil displays some peculiarities because the yeast used is recycled in a non-aseptic process. After centrifugation, the cells are treated with acid to control the bacterial growth. However, it is difficult to manage the indigenous yeasts without affecting the main culture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This work evaluated how the cell treatment could be modified to combat contaminant yeasts based on the differential sensitivities to low pH and high concentrations of ethanol displayed by an industrial strain of S. cerevisiae and three strains of Dekkera bruxellensis, which are common contaminant yeasts in Brazilian fermentation processes. The tests were initially performed in rich medium with a low pH or a high concentration of ethanol to analyse the yeast growth profile. Then, the single and combined effects of low pH and ethanol concentration on the yeast cell viability were evaluated under non-proliferative conditions. The effects on the fermentation parameters were also verified. S. cerevisiae grew best when not subjected to the stresses, but this yeast and D. bruxellensis had similar growth kinetics when exposed to a low pH or increased ethanol concentrations. However, the combined treatments of low pH (2.0) and ethanol (11 or 13 %) resulted in a decrease of D. bruxellensis cell viability almost three times higher than of S. cerevisiae, which was only slightly affected by all cell treatments. The initial viability of the treated cells was restored within 8 h of growth in sugar cane juice, with the exception of the combined treatment for D. bruxellensis. The ethanol-based cell treatment, in despite of slowing the fermentation, could decrease and maintain D. bruxellensis population under control while S. cerevisiae was taking over the fermentation along six fermentative cycles. These results indicate that it may be possible to control the growth of D. bruxellensis without major effects on S. cerevisiae. The cells could be treated between the fermentation cycles by the parcelled addition of 13 % ethanol to the tanks in which the yeast cream is treated with sulphuric acid at pH 2.0.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23536198     DOI: 10.1007/s11274-013-1329-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 0959-3993            Impact factor:   3.312


  21 in total

1.  Antimicrobial effects of wine: separating the role of polyphenols, pH, ethanol, and other wine components.

Authors:  Natasa Boban; Marija Tonkic; Danijela Budimir; Darko Modun; Davorka Sutlovic; Volga Punda-Polic; Mladen Boban
Journal:  J Food Sci       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 2.  Scientific challenges of bioethanol production in Brazil.

Authors:  Henrique V Amorim; Mário Lucio Lopes; Juliana Velasco de Castro Oliveira; Marcos S Buckeridge; Gustavo Henrique Goldman
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Thermal inactivation of the wine spoilage yeasts Dekkera/Brettanomyces.

Authors:  José António Couto; Filipe Neves; Francisco Campos; Tim Hogg
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2005-07-05       Impact factor: 5.277

4.  The ability to use nitrate confers advantage to Dekkera bruxellensis over S. cerevisiae and can explain its adaptation to industrial fermentation processes.

Authors:  Will de Barros Pita; Fernanda Cristina Bezerra Leite; Anna Theresa de Souza Liberal; Diogo Ardaillon Simões; Marcos Antonio de Morais
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 2.271

5.  A sulphite-inducible form of the sulphite efflux gene SSU1 in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeast.

Authors:  Tiziana Nardi; Viviana Corich; Alessio Giacomini; Bruno Blondin
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 2.777

6.  Growth rates of Dekkera/Brettanomyces yeasts hinder their ability to compete with Saccharomyces cerevisiae in batch corn mash fermentations.

Authors:  D A Abbott; S H Hynes; W M Ingledew
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2004-11-06       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Global gene expression during short-term ethanol stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  H Alexandre; V Ansanay-Galeote; S Dequin; B Blondin
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 4.124

8.  Physiological and molecular analysis of the stress response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae imposed by strong inorganic acid with implication to industrial fermentations.

Authors:  H F de Melo; B M Bonini; J Thevelein; D A Simões; M A Morais
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 3.772

9.  Survival patterns of Dekkera bruxellensis in wines and inhibitory effect of sulphur dioxide.

Authors:  A Barata; J Caldeira; R Botelheiro; D Pagliara; M Malfeito-Ferreira; V Loureiro
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 5.277

10.  Brettanomyces bruxellensis: effect of oxygen on growth and acetic acid production.

Authors:  M G Aguilar Uscanga; M-L Délia; P Strehaiano
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2003-01-14       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  1 in total

1.  Bioethanol strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae characterised by microsatellite and stress resistance.

Authors:  Vanda Renata Reis; Ana Teresa Burlamaqui Faraco Antonangelo; Ana Paula Guarnieri Bassi; Débora Colombi; Sandra Regina Ceccato-Antonini
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 2.476

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.