Literature DB >> 20203053

A sulphite-inducible form of the sulphite efflux gene SSU1 in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeast.

Tiziana Nardi1, Viviana Corich2,1, Alessio Giacomini2,1, Bruno Blondin3.   

Abstract

Sulphite is widely used as a preservative in foods and beverages for its antimicrobial and antioxidant activities, particularly in winemaking where SO(2) is frequently added. Thus, sulphite resistance mechanisms have been extensively studied in the fermenting yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Sulphite detoxification, involving a plasma membrane protein encoded by the SSU1 gene, is the most efficient resistance mechanism in S. cerevisiae. In this study, we characterized the unusual expression pattern of SSU1 in the wine strain 71B. We provide, for the first time, evidence of SSU1 induction by sulphite. The study of SSU1 expression during fermentation and in different growth conditions showed that sulphite is the main regulator of SSU1 expression, explaining its specific pattern. Combining analyses of gene expression and growth behaviour in response to sulphite, we found that 71B displayed unique behavioural patterns in response to sulphite pre-adaptation that may be explained by changes in SSU1 expression. Examination of the genomic organization of the SSU1 locus and sequencing of the region revealed three different alleles in 71B, two of which corresponded to translocated VIII-XVI forms. The lack of differences between promoter regions suggests that this inducible SSU1 expression pattern is due to modification of regulatory/signalling pathways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20203053     DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.036723-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiology        ISSN: 1350-0872            Impact factor:   2.777


  19 in total

1.  A unique ecological niche fosters hybridization of oak-tree and vineyard isolates of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Katie J Clowers; Jessica L Will; Audrey P Gasch
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  Genetic variability and physiological traits of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains isolated from "Vale dos Vinhedos" vineyards reflect agricultural practices and history of this Brazilian wet subtropical area.

Authors:  Giulia Crosato; Milena Carlot; Alberto De Iseppi; Juliano Garavaglia; Laura Massochin Nunes Pinto; Denise Righetto Ziegler; Renata Cristina de Souza Ramos; Rochele Cassanta Rossi; Chiara Nadai; Alessio Giacomini; Viviana Corich
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Effects of single and combined cell treatments based on low pH and high concentrations of ethanol on the growth and fermentation of Dekkera bruxellensis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Ana Paula Guarnieri Bassi; Jéssica Carolina Gomes da Silva; Vanda Renata Reis; Sandra Regina Ceccato-Antonini
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Genome-wide transcriptional profiling of the purple sulfur bacterium Allochromatium vinosum DSM 180T during growth on different reduced sulfur compounds.

Authors:  Thomas Weissgerber; Nadine Dobler; Tino Polen; Jeanette Latus; Yvonne Stockdreher; Christiane Dahl
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  The Mechanisms of Thiosulfate Toxicity against Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Zhigang Chen; Yongzhen Xia; Huaiwei Liu; Honglei Liu; Luying Xun
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-22

6.  De-novo assembly and analysis of the heterozygous triploid genome of the wine spoilage yeast Dekkera bruxellensis AWRI1499.

Authors:  Chris D Curtin; Anthony R Borneman; Paul J Chambers; Isak S Pretorius
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Aerobic transformation of cadmium through metal sulfide biosynthesis in photosynthetic microorganisms.

Authors:  Chad D Edwards; Joseph C Beatty; Jacqueline B R Loiselle; Katya A Vlassov; Daniel D Lefebvre
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 3.605

8.  QTL dissection of Lag phase in wine fermentation reveals a new translocation responsible for Saccharomyces cerevisiae adaptation to sulfite.

Authors:  Adrien Zimmer; Cécile Durand; Nicolás Loira; Pascal Durrens; David James Sherman; Philippe Marullo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Ecological and Genetic Barriers Differentiate Natural Populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Katie J Clowers; Justin Heilberger; Jeff S Piotrowski; Jessica L Will; Audrey P Gasch
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Efficient fermentation of an improved synthetic grape must by enological and laboratory strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Tiago Viana; Maria C Loureiro-Dias; Catarina Prista
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.298

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.