| Literature DB >> 23533716 |
Jenifer d'El-Rei1, Ana Rosa Cunha, Adriana Burlá, Marcelo Burlá, Wille Oigman, Mario Fritsch Neves, Agostino Virdis, Fernanda Medeiros.
Abstract
Recent findings indicate an inverse relationship between cardiovascular disease and consumption of flavonoids. We aimed to identify clinical and vascular parameters of treated hypertensive who present beneficial effects of dark chocolate for one-week period on vascular function. Twenty-one hypertensive subjects, aged 40-65 years, were included in a prospective study with measurement of blood pressure (BP), brachial flow-mediated dilatation (FMD), peripheral arterial tonometry, and central hemodynamic parameters. These tests were repeated after seven days of eating dark chocolate 75 g/day. Patients were divided according to the response in FMD: responders (n = 12) and nonresponders (n = 9). The responder group presented lower age (54 ± 7 versus 61 ± 6 years, P = 0.037), Framingham risk score (FRS) (2.5 ± 1.8 versus 8.1 ± 5.1%, P = 0.017), values of peripheral (55 ± 9 versus 63 ± 5 mmHg, P = 0.041), and central pulse pressure (PP) (44 ± 10 versus 54 ± 6 mmHg, P = 0.021). FMD response showed negative correlation with FRS (r = -0.60, P = 0.014), baseline FMD (r = -0.54, P = 0.011), baseline reactive hyperemia index (RHI; r = -0.56, P = 0.008), and central PP (r = -0.43, P = 0.05). However, after linear regression analysis, only FRS and baseline RHI were associated with FMD response. In conclusion, one-week dark chocolate intake significantly improved endothelial function and reduced BP in younger hypertensive with impaired endothelial function in spite of lower cardiovascular risk.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23533716 PMCID: PMC3603200 DOI: 10.1155/2013/985087
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Hypertens Impact factor: 2.420
Baseline characteristics of study population and responder (RESP) and nonresponder (N-RESP) groups.
| Parameters | Total sample | RESP | N-RESP |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 57 ± 8 | 54 ± 8 | 61 ± 6* | 0.037 |
| Framingham risk score, % | 5.3 ± 4.7 | 2.5 ± 1.8 | 8.1 ± 5.1* | 0.011 |
| Body mass index, Kg/m² | 28.2 ± 4.5 | 29.7 ± 5.2 | 26.1 ± 2.9 | 0.065 |
| Systolic BP, mmHg | 141 ± 11 | 140 ± 12 | 142 ± 8 | 0.718 |
| Diastolic BP, mmHg | 82 ± 9 | 85 ± 7 | 79 ± 9 | 0.147 |
| Pulse pressure, mmHg | 58 ± 9 | 55 ± 9 | 63 ± 5 | 0.041 |
| Mean arterial pressure, mmHg | 101 ± 9 | 103 ± 8 | 100 ± 9 | 0.417 |
| Total cholesterol, mmol/L | 5.56 ± 1.21 | 5.30 ± 0.77 | 5.84 ± 1.52 | 0.355 |
| HDL-cholesterol, mmol/L | 1.24 ± 0.36 | 1.27 ± 0.31 | 1.21 ± 0.41 | 0.771 |
| LDL-cholesterol, mmol/L | 3.46 ± 0.72 | 3.31 ± 0.67 | 3.62 ± 0.77 | 0.411 |
| Triglycerides, mmol/L | 1.56 ± 1.13 | 1.41 ± 0.53 | 1.70 ± 1.55 | 0.594 |
| Fasting glucose, mmol/L | 4.72 ± 0.5 | 4.72 ± 0.61 | 4.67 ± 0.39 | 0.864 |
| Flow-mediated dilation, % | 10.7 ± 5.5 | 8.4 ± 5.9 | 13.8 ± 2.8* | 0.023 |
| Reactive hyperemia index, units | 2.03 ± 0.71 | 1.70 ± 0.63 | 2.47 ± 0.51** | 0.006 |
| Augmentation pressure, mmHg | 15 ± 7 | 15 ± 7 | 16 ± 5 | 0.869 |
| Augmentation index, % | 32 ± 11 | 34 ± 12 | 29 ± 9 | 0.343 |
| Aortic systolic BP, mmHg | 130 ± 15 | 128 ± 18 | 133 ± 11 | 0.550 |
| Aortic pulse pressure, mmHg | 48 ± 10 | 44 ± 10 | 54 ± 6* | 0.021 |
Results are expressed as mean ± SD. BP: blood pressure; HDL: high density lipoprotein; LDL: low-density lipoprotein. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 versus responder group.
Clinical and vascular parameters in responder (RESP) and nonresponder (N-RESP) groups before and after chocolate consumption.
| Parameters | RESP group ( | N- RESP group ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before chocolate | After chocolate |
| Before chocolate | After chocolate |
| |
| Weight (Kg) | 78.8 ± 11.9 | 78.3 ± 11.4 | 0.185 | 71.2 ± 16.1 | 71.5 ± 16.3 | 0.403 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 140 ± 13 | 131 ± 10 | 0.015 | 142 ± 8 | 142 ± 10 | 1.000 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 85 ± 7 | 82 ± 8 | 0.050 | 79 ± 9 | 83 ± 10 | 0.276 |
| PP (mmHg) | 55 ± 9 | 48 ± 5 | 0.084 | 63 ± 5 | 60 ± 7 | 0.313 |
| MAP (mmHg) | 103 ± 9 | 98 ± 9 | 0.007 | 100 ± 9 | 102 ± 10 | 0.368 |
| FMD (%) | 8.4 ± 5.9 | 16.6 ± 8.2 | <0.001 | 13.8 ± 2.8 | 11.3 ± 4.2 | 0.030 |
| RHI (units) | 1.70 ± 0.63 | 1.87 ± 0.54 | 0.134 | 2.47 ± 0.51 | 2.17 ± 0.42 | 0.124 |
| AP (mmHg) | 15 ± 7 | 11 ± 5 | 0.092 | 16 ± 5 | 13 ± 10 | 0.323 |
| Aix (%) | 34 ± 13 | 28 ± 12 | 0.209 | 29 ± 9 | 26 ± 12 | 0.299 |
| Aortic SBP (mmHg) | 128 ± 19 | 121 ± 9 | 0.249 | 133 ± 11 | 131 ± 18 | 0.732 |
| Aortic PP (mmHg) | 44 ± 10 | 36 ± 7 | 0.079 | 53 ± 6 | 46 ± 13 | 0.127 |
Results are expressed as mean ± SD. SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; PP: pulse pressure; MAP: mean arterial pressure; FMD: flow-mediated dilation; RHI: reactive hyperemia index; AP: augmentation pressure; Aix: augmentation index.
Figure 1Negative correlation of flow-mediated dilation (FMD) response with Framingham risk score (a) and with baseline reactive hyperemia index (b).