| Literature DB >> 23532702 |
Siobhan Simpson1, Nick Blampied, Gabriela Peniche, Anne Dozières, Tiffany Blackett, Stephen Coleman, Nina Cornish, Jim J Groombridge.
Abstract
Wildlife populations have been introduced to new areas by people for centuries, but this human-mediated movement can disrupt natural patterns of genetic structure by altering patterns of gene flow. Insular populations are particularly prone to these influences due to limited opportunities for natural dispersal onto islands. Consequently, understanding how genetic patterns develop in island populations is important, particularly given that islands are frequently havens for protected wildlife. We examined the evolutionary origins and extent of genetic structure within the introduced island population of red squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris) on the Channel Island of Jersey using mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) control region sequence and nuclear microsatellite genotypes. Our findings reveal two different genetic origins and a genetic architecture reflective of the introductions 120 years ago. Genetic structure is marked within the maternally inherited mtDNA, indicating slow dispersal of female squirrels. However, nuclear markers detected only weak genetic structure, indicating substantially greater male dispersal. Data from both mitochondrial and nuclear markers support historic records that squirrels from England were introduced to the west of the island and those from mainland Europe to the east. Although some level of dispersal and introgression across the island between the two introductions is evident, there has not yet been sufficient gene flow to erase this historic genetic "footprint." We also investigated if inbreeding has contributed to high observed levels of disease, but found no association. Genetic footprints of introductions can persist for considerable periods of time and beyond traditional timeframes of wildlife management.Entities:
Keywords: Conservation; genetic structure; islands; population genetics; red squirrels; reintroduction
Year: 2013 PMID: 23532702 PMCID: PMC3605850 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.486
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Details of multiplex combinations, whether the multiplexing was done pre- or post-PCR, allele size ranges, and null allele frequencies within the Jersey population, number of Jersey individuals successfully genotyped (n), Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium test P-value (PHWE) (those with a * are significantly out of HWE at 0.01 level, – indicates that the test was not performed) for each population and number of alleles per locus (A), mean observed (Ho), and expected (He) heterozygosity in both the Jersey population and the published data (Todd 2000; Hale et al. 2001)
| Jersey | Published | PHWE | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Locus | Multiplex | Pre- or post-PCR | Allele size range (bp) | A | Ho | He | A | Ho | He | Null allele frequency | Jersey | France | IOW | |
| Scv1 | 2 | Pre | 175–185 | 184 | 4 | 0.522 | 0.574 | 8 | 0.407 | 0.737 | 0.09 | 0.2406 | 0.1474 | 0.0866 |
| Scv3 | 7 | Post | 198–222 | 181 | 7 | 0.425 | 0.486 | 12 | 0.478 | 0.873 | 0.17 | 0.421 | 0.9166 | 0.0321 |
| Scv6 | 5 | Post | 186–201 | 204 | 9 | 0.49 | 0.524 | 6 | 0.429 | 0.783 | 0.05 | 0.0731 | 0.1024 | 0.0193 |
| Scv8 | 3 | Pre | 192–201 | 204 | 5 | 0.466 | 0.514 | 5 | 0.348 | 0.655 | 0.12 | 0.4328 | 1 | 0.2341 |
| Scv9 | 4 | Pre | 192–199 | 194 | 8 | 0.536 | 0.683 | 5 | 0.25 | 0.431 | 0.13 | 0.0053* | 0.1215 | 0.016 |
| Scv12 | 1 | Post | 188–199 | 199 | 5 | 0.497 | 0.544 | 2 | 0.394 | 0.454 | 0.11 | 1 | 0.3695 | 0.0092* |
| Scv13 | 2 | Pre | 165–181 | 206 | 3 | 0.388 | 0.479 | 3 | 0.697 | 0.603 | 0.18 | 0.6737 | 0.0265 | – |
| Scv14 | 7 | Pre | 194–196 | 210 | 4 | 0.333 | 0.396 | 3 | 0.027 | 0.103 | 0.14 | 0.0163 | 0.2252 | 0.0001* |
| Scv16 | 6 | Post | 182–193 | 193 | 5 | 0.513 | 0.621 | 5 | 0.357 | 0.696 | 0.14 | 0.1089 | 0.4463 | 1 |
| Scv23 | 1 | Post | 157–164 | 201 | 6 | 0.463 | 0.56 | 8 | 0.5 | 0.657 | 0.13 | 0.2303 | 0.5088 | 0.1309 |
| Scv32 | 4 | Pre | 230–141 | 187 | 5 | 0.582 | 0.653 | 6 | 0.394 | 0.614 | 0.21 | 0.0255 | 0* | 0.0418 |
| Rsu3 | 5 | Post | 162–165 | 204 | 4 | 0.387 | 0.476 | 7 | 0.574 | 0.522 | 0.16 | 0.2136 | 0.3231 | 0.0003* |
| Rsu4 | 7 | Pre | 253–283 | 183 | 7 | 0.574 | 0.698 | 8 | 0.723 | 0.781 | 0.15 | 0.2484 | 0.6567 | 0.0139 |
| Rsu5 | 3 | Pre | 132–141 | 206 | 5 | 0.335 | 0.369 | 7 | 0.455 | 0.393 | 0.25 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Rsu6 | 4 | Pre | 121–126 | 213 | 3 | 0.399 | 0.429 | 4 | 0.365 | 0.273 | 0.06 | 0.4336 | 0.2881 | 1 |
Figure 1Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree (Jukes–Cantor with 1000 bootstraps, rooted to Sciurus vulgaris (not shown). Nodes that include French haplotypes are gray, those that include haplotypes from Isle of Wight are shaded in gray and haplotypes from samples collected on Jersey are shown with a star. Sequences obtained from Genbank are annotated with their accession numbers, all have their country of origin in the name.
Figure 2Map of location of the two mtDNA haplotypes found on Jersey. Haplotype 1 (white circles) is most similar to British haplotypes and haplotype 2 (black circles) is most similar to European haplotypes. The sites where red squirrels are documented to have been introduced are marked as follows: Rozel (R), La Hague Manor (H), La Moie House (M), and St Ouen's Manor (O).
Figure 3Upper panel – map of genome proportions from structure output when K = 2. Individuals with more white are those with more of their genome from group 1 and are found mainly in the southwest, while individuals with more black are from group 2 and are mainly found in the northeast. Those individuals with red dots were identified as having amyloidosis. Lower panel – the proportion of each individuals genome that is group 1 (white) and group 2 (dark gray) ordered by location from east to west.
Figure 4Plot of logarithmic proportion of an individual's genome that is estimated to be of English origin against geographic longitude of the sample location. Amyloid individuals are shown as black-filled circles; nonamyloid individuals are shown as unfilled circles. Lines are fitted for each group (red line, amyloid; black line, nonamyloid).