| Literature DB >> 25126848 |
Célia Rézouki1, Anne Dozières1, Christie Le Cœur1, Sophie Thibault2, Benoît Pisanu1, Jean-Louis Chapuis1, Emmanuelle Baudry2.
Abstract
Whether urban parks can maintain viable and self-sustaining populations over the long term is questionable. In highly urbanized landscapes, urban parks could play a role in biodiversity conservation by providing habitat and resources to native species. However, populations inhabiting urban parks are usually small and isolated, leading to increased demographic stochasticity and genetic drift, with expected negative consequences on their viability. Here, we investigated a European red squirrel population located in an urban park close to Paris, France (Parc de Sceaux; 184 ha) to assess its viability. Using mitochondrial D-loop sequences and 13 microsatellite loci, we showed that the population presented high levels of genetic variation and no evidence of inbreeding. The size of the population was estimated at 100-120 individuals based on the comparison of two census techniques, Distance Sampling and Capture-Mark-Recapture. The estimated heterozygosity level and population size were integrated in a Population Viability Analysis to project the likelihood of the population's persistence over time. Results indicate that the red squirrel population of this urban park can be viable on the long term (i.e. 20 years) for a range of realistic demographic parameters (juvenile survival at least >40%) and immigration rates (at least one immigration event every two years). This study highlights that urban parks can be potential suitable refuges for the red squirrel, a locally threatened species across western European countries, provided that ecological corridors are maintained.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25126848 PMCID: PMC4134253 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105111
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Map of the Parc de Sceaux showing the distribution of line transects, traps, and woody areas suitable to red squirrels.
Results of the genetic diversity analyses obtained per locus for the red squirrel populations.
| Locus | N. genotyped | Heterozygosity |
| |
| observed | expected | |||
|
| ||||
| Rsu3 | 61 | 0.393 | 0.465 | 0.269 |
| Rsu4 | 48 | 0.521 | 0.462 | 0.717 |
| Rsu5 | 38 | 0.474 | 0.417 | 0.459 |
| Rsu6 | 65 | 0.554 | 0.526 | 0.021 |
| Scv6 | 54 | 0.704 | 0.592 | 0.322 |
| Scv8 | 47 | 0.255 | 0.232 | 1.000 |
| Scv1 | 64 | 0.500 | 0.395 | 0.118 |
| Scv12 | 55 | 0.255 | 0.230 | 1.000 |
| Scv13 | 54 | 0.426 | 0.408 | 0.178 |
| Scv14 | 64 | 0.516 | 0.627 | 0.159 |
| Scv15 | 52 | - | - | - |
| Scv3 | 59 | 0.678 | 0.822 | *0.001 |
| Scv9 | 46 | 0.522 | 0.518 | 1.000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Rsu3 | 20 | 0.450 | 0.522 | 0.789 |
| Rsu4 | 8 | 0.375 | 0.442 | 0.379 |
| Rsu5 | 10 | 0.100 | 0.100 | 1.000 |
| Rsu6 | 21 | 0.190 | 0.251 | 0.339 |
| Scv6 | 15 | 0.800 | 0.632 | 0.139 |
| Scv8 | 10 | 0.300 | 0.279 | 1.000 |
| Scv1 | 9 | 0.889 | 0.725 | 1.000 |
| Scv12 | 11 | 0.364 | 0.645 | 0.140 |
| Scv13 | 9 | 0.444 | 0.451 | 0.247 |
| Scv14 | 19 | - | - | - |
| Scv15 | 18 | 0.111 | 0.110 | 1.000 |
| Scv3 | 18 | 0.778 | 0.873 | *0.000 |
| Scv9 | 6 | 0.833 | 0.712 | 0.340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimates of red squirrel density (individuals per ha) using distance sampling in two areas of the Parc de Sceaux and spatially explicit capture-recapture models in the eastern area.
| Method | Area | Months | Counts | Density±SE | 95%C.I. |
| Distance sampling | Western | November-December 2012 | 35 | 1.2±0.5 | 0.5–3.0 |
| Eastern | 56 | 2.4±0.9 | 1.1–5.5 | ||
| Western | March 2013 | 24 | 0.9±0.4 | 0.3–2.3 | |
| Eastern | 54 | 2.3±0.7 | 1.3–4.4 | ||
| Capture-Recapture | Eastern | October 2012 | - | 3.0±0.8 | 1.8–5.0 |
| Eastern | February 2013 | - | 2.6±0.7 | 1.6–4.3 |
Figure 2Relationships between the deterministic growth rate of the population, the rate of juvenile survival and the age at which females have their first litter.
Results of simulations run for the population viability analysis of red squirrels population of the Parc de Sceaux.
| Scenarios | Stochastic growth rate (SD) | Probability of extinction | Expected heterozygosity (SD) | ||
| Rate (%) of | |||||
| Age at first litter | Juvenile survival | Breeding females at high density | |||
| 1 year | 20 | 35 | −0.24 (0.49) | 0.82 | 0.32 (0.09) |
| 50 | −0.21 (0.55) | 0.78 | 0.32 (0.10) | ||
| 30 | 35 | −0.11 (0.51) | 0.39 | 0.33 (0.08) | |
| 50 | −0.07 (0.50) | 0.34 | 0.34 (0.08) | ||
| 40 | 35 | −0.02 (0.46) | 0.09 | 0.37 (0.06) | |
| 50 | 0.04 (0.44) | 0.07 | 0.38 (0.06) | ||
| 50 | 35 | 0.04 (0.42) | 0.02 | 0.39 (0.05) | |
| 50 | 0.14 (0.39) | <0.01 | 0.41 (0.04) | ||
| 2 years | 20 | 35 | −0.29 (0.47) | 0.92 | 0.30 (0.08) |
| 50 | −0.27 (0.48) | 0.90 | 0.33 (0.07) | ||
| 30 | 35 | −0.19 (0.44) | 0.65 | 0.33 (0.08) | |
| 50 | −0.16 (0.45) | 0.58 | 0.35 (0.07) | ||
| 40 | 35 | −0.11 (0.42) | 0.33 | 0.36 (0.07) | |
| 50 | −0.08 (0.42) | 0.22 | 0.38 (0.06) | ||
| 50 | 35 | −0.06 (0.39) | 0.12 | 0.38 (0.06) | |
| 50 | −0.02 (0.39) | 0.07 | 0.40 (0.05) |