Literature DB >> 23532355

Factors affecting hospital length of stay following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Paul M Arnold1, Lisa R Rice, Karen K Anderson, Joan K McMahon, Lynne M Connelly, Daniel C Norvell.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
BACKGROUND: Several studies focus on the long-term results of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgeries, but little information exists regarding how various patient-related, procedure-related, and payer-related variables may affect postoperative hospital length of stay (LOS).
OBJECTIVE: To determine what factors, if any, contribute to increased hospital LOS in patients who have had an ACDF.
METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 108 consecutive patients who underwent elective ACDF at a Midwest academic medical center. Extensive preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were abstracted and analyzed to identify prognostic factors for an increased LOS. Multivariate analysis was performed to analyze the effects of patient and hospital characteristics on hospital LOS.
RESULTS: 103 patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria. The mean LOS for patients undergoing ACDF was 1.98 (±1.6) days. Only 29% of patients had one level fused. The mean blood loss during surgery was 87.4 ± 99.6 mL. One subject lost 700 mL of blood. Complications, though rare, included uncontrolled postoperative pain (13%), cardiac (6%), pulmonary (4%), and urinary (3%). Covariates included in the final model were age, sex, cardiac complication, urinary complication, and pulmonary complication. Factors that contributed to increased LOS and their associated adjusted mean days were: ≥50 years of age (2.5 ± 1.2 days), female gender (2.3 ± 1.2 days), and three particular types of complications. The complications that had the largest effect on increased LOS from least to most severe were cardiac (3.5 ± 1.3 days), urinary (4.7 ± 1.3 days), and pulmonary (5.3 ± 1.3 days).
CONCLUSIONS: The information presented in this study may be useful for patients, clinicians, and insurance companies, including precertification and case-management services. Our results can be instrumental in designing future prospective studies using more detailed analyses with more patients, more surgeons, and multiple institutions. [Table: see text].

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 23532355      PMCID: PMC3604758          DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1267108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evid Based Spine Care J        ISSN: 1663-7976


Study Rationale and Context

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is indicated for radiculopathy, myelopathy, or neck pain unrelieved by nonsurgical means. Garvey et al1 found that 78% of the patients who presented with symptoms attributed them to a motor vehicle injury or work-related injury, leaving 22% with an unknown etiology of symptoms with no injury involved. Many studies have looked at long-term outcomes of patients who have undergone ACDF, and found a high rate of patient satisfaction.1 There may be complications, some of which can result in a longer hospital stay; however, we found no studies that included the contribution of perioperative complications to an increased length of stay (LOS). Already identified in other studies are variables that contribute to LOS and recovery time; we analyzed these variables in our study for correlation to LOS, which also plays a role in patient satisfaction and procedure outcome.

Objective

To determine what factors, if any, contribute to increased postoperative hospital stay in patients who have had an ACDF.

Materials and Methods

Retrospective cohort study using the quota-sampling method for record selection. Records were listed of all patients having had elective ACDF by one attending neurosurgeon, beginning with those who had surgery the month prior to institutional review board application submission. From this list we worked backward with the goal of gathering data from 108 consecutive charts, a cohort number considered adequate to obtain clinically useful results. Age ≥18 years; nontrauma patient, no other physical injuries Admitted to the hospital after surgery Unresponsive to at least 6 weeks of conservative treatment and/or presented with progressive symptoms of nerve root or spinal cord compression Underwent elective ACDF for: (1) myelopathy, radiculopathy, myeloradiculopathy; (2) stenosis, spinal cord compression, spinal cord change; (3) herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP), degenerative disc disease, spondylosis, osteophytic complexes; and (4) foraminal stenosis Age <18 years; trauma patient with other physical injuries Emergent admission with nonelective surgery Evidence of adjacent segment stiffness secondary to pathology, such as diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis, ankylosing spondylitis, congenital abnormality, or rheumatoid arthritis A total of 108 consecutive patients underwent elective ACDF surgery by one neurosurgeon; of these, five were not eligible for inclusion (two were involved in trauma; two were emergent admissions with surgery not electively scheduled; and one had osteomyelitis). Anterior approach to perform a discectomy and decompress the affected spinal level. Either autograft or allograft bone was placed in the intervertebral space to stimulate healing and eventual fusion between the end plates. A metal plate was affixed to the adjoining vertebrae to stabilize the construct, maintain neck lordosis, and allow for optimal bone healing and fusion. The following covariates were collected from hospital-billing records, patient charts, and outpatient clinic records. We were limited to what had been collected. Patient demographics (age, sex, weight, height, and type of insurance) Medical comorbidities (cardiovascular, previous spine surgery, cancer, central nervous system, central nervous system-psychiatric, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, respiratory, degenerative disc disease/degenerative joint disease, diabetes) Tobacco, alcohol, and drug use Symptoms: neck pain only, radiating pain, numbness and tingling, weakness, difficulty swallowing/hoarseness, difficulty with ambulation, and duration of symptoms Primary diagnosis in one of five categories: myelopathy, radiculopathy, myeloradiculopathy stenosis, spinal cord compression, spinal cord change HNP, degenerative disc disease, spondylosis, osteophytic complexes foraminal stenosis previous cervical fusion Surgical details (levels of fusion, operative time, estimated blood loss, and preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative medications) Home medications (opioid and nonopioid pain medications, muscle relaxants, steroidal antiinflammatories, non-steroidal antiinflammatories, psychotropic, and other central nervous system medications) Payer/insurance characteristics We noted all postoperative complications reported in the medical record from mild to severe to ensure that any event that could influence hospital LOS was accounted for. The following categories of complications were available: none; new neurological deficit (new onset numbness/weakness in upper extremity (UE); dysphagia; cardiac (which included only hypertension and broadly defined cardiac or noncardiac chest pain); urinary (urinary retention, problems urinating after Foley removal); anxiety; pulmonary (decreased sats, need for O2 and aggressive pulmonary toilet, exacerbation of asthma, respiratory failure, atelectasis, pneumonia); fever; uncontrolled postoperative pain (severe pain issues, pain uncontrolled by current pain medications, admitted from emergency department for pain, increased need for pain medications). Hospital LOS in days, calculated as date/time of surgery to date/time of discharge. Means ± standard deviations and frequency counts and rates were reported for continuous and categorical covariates, respectively. We performed univariate comparisons of all variables listed in the section covariates to determine our candidate covariates for the final multivariate model. All variables that were associated with the outcome LOS with P < .05 were considered in the multivariate model. We then built a systematic multivariate linear regression model by adding variables to the model in the order given in the section labeled covariates. Variables that did not have an association of P < .05 with LOS did not remain in the model. The overall R2, regression coefficients, and associated P values were reported for all covariates included in the final model. The adjusted mean LOS and standard deviations for each covariate were computed using the post regression command “adjust” in Stata 9.1. One hundred and three patients (95.4%) were deemed eligible and included in the final analysis (Fig. 1). There were four missing data elements for insurance information. There were no missing data for other covariates.
Fig. 1

Patient sampling and selection.

Of 103 patients included in the study, 56 (54%) were women, and the average age was 49.1 years; average height, 67.3 inches; and average weight, 87.1 kg (Table 1).
Table 1

Baseline demographics and general health characteristics of patients undergoing cervical fusion*.

CharacteristicPatients (N = 103), No. (%) or mean ± SD
Female56 (54)
Age, y49.1 ± 9.9
Height, in67.3 ± 4.1
Weight, kg87.1 ± 19.1
Smoke, packs per day.38 ± .60
Regular alcohol use, yes14 (14)
Previous spine surgery17 (17)
Psychiatric issues25 (24)
Respiratory17 (17)
Degenerative joint disease2 (2)
Cervical spondylotic myelopathy51 (50)
Herniated nucleus pulposus65 (63)
Stenosis35 (34)
Central nervous system25 (24)
Diabetes12 (12)
Gastrointestinal25 (24)
Cardiovascular disease45 (44)
Genitourinary11 (11)
Cancer3 (3)

Missing 11 height and 2 weight data points.

Including myelopathy, radiculopathy, and myeloradiculopathy.

Herniated disc, degenerative disc disease, spondylosis, osteophytes.

Sixty-five patients (63%) had concomitant HNP; 51 (50%) had cervical spondylotic myelopathy; and 45 (44%) had cardiovascular disease; 38 (37%) of 103 patients who were current cigarette smokers smoked an average of 0.38 packs per day. Other concomitant conditions were stenosis (34%), psychiatric (24%), central nervous system (24%), gastrointestinal (24%), previous spine surgery (17%), respiratory (17%), regular alcohol use (14%), diabetes (12%), genitourinary (11%), cancer (3%), and degenerative joint disease (2%) (Table 1). Presenting symptoms included neck pain, 78 patients (76%); UE pain, 75 (73%); and unilateral UE numbness, 37 (36%). Bilateral UE numbness was a presenting symptom in 16 patients (16%), as was unilateral UE weakness. Symptom duration was long (12+ months) for 29 patients (28%); short (3.0–5.9 months) for 24 patients (23%); and medium (6.0–11.9 months) for 16 patients (16%) (Table 2).
Table 2

Baseline pain and symptoms of patients undergoing cervical fusion*.

CharacteristicPatients (N = 103), No. (%)
Neck pain78 (76)
UE pain75 (73)
Unilateral UE numbness37 (36)
Bilateral UE numbness16 (16)
Unilateral UE weakness16 (16)
Bilateral UE weakness3 (3)
Unilateral LE numbness5 (5)
Bilateral LE numbness2 (2)
Unilateral LE weakness3 (3)
Bilateral LE weakness3 (3)
Ambulation difficulty5 (5)
Symptom duration (short)24 (23)
Symptom duration (medium)16 (16)
Symptom duration (long)29 (28)

UE indicates upper extremity; LE, lower extremity.

The mean LOS for patients undergoing ACDF was 1.98 (±1.6) days. Twenty-nine patients (29%) had one level fused; 41, two levels (41%); 21, three levels (21%); and 8, four levels fused (8%). The average length of surgery was 3.4 (±.99) hours, and the average blood loss during surgery was 87.4 ± 99.6 mL. Patients' concomitant medications were tracked, as well as the intraoperative and postoperative medications administered in the hospital (Table 3).
Table 3

Surgery-specific characteristics of patients undergoing cervical fusion*.

FactorPatients (N = 103),No. (%) or mean ±SD
Length of hospital stay, d1.98 ± 1.6
Length of surgery, h3.4 ± .99
Levels fused1234 29 (29)41 (41)21 (21)8 (8)
Blood loss, mL87.4 ± 99.6
Intraoperative medications Anti-infectivesCardiovascularNSAIDSSteroids 97 (94)46 (45)4 (4)54 (52)
Postoperative medications Pain IVPain narcoticPain non-narcoticMuscle relaxantSedativesPain consult 20 (19)101 (98)77 (75)27 (26)18 (18)32 (31)
Home medications OpioidsPain nonopioidMuscle relaxantsSteroidsNSAIDsPsychotropicsCentral nervous system 51 (50)20 (19)27 (26)5 (5)32 (31)45 (44)32 (31)

NSAIDS indicates nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs; IV, intravenous.

One patient had 700 mL blood loss and was treated with iron tid.

Individual perioperative complications were rare, the most common of which were uncontrolled postoperative pain (severe pain issues, pain uncontrolled by current pain medications, admitted from the emergency department for pain, increased need for pain medications: 13%), as well as cardiac complications (which included only hypertension and broadly defined cardiac or noncardiac chest pain: 6%), urinary complications (urinary retention, problems urinating after Foley removal: 3%), and pulmonary complications (decreased sats, need for O2 and aggressive pulmonary toilet, exacerbation of asthma, respiratory failure, atelectasis, pneumonia: 4%) (Table 4). Most complaints of chest pain were due to neck muscles pulling on the chest wall; no actual cardiac events occurred postoperatively as verified by cardiac work-up. There were no procedure-related or wound complications, and this study did not track delayed complications in the outpatient setting.
Table 4

Postoperative complications after cervical spine fusion.

ComplicationsPatients (N = 103), No. (%)
Any complication77 (75)
Neurological1 (1)
Dysphagia2 (2)
Cardiac6 (6)
Urinary3 (3)
Anxiety1 (1)
Pulmonary4 (4)
Fever2 (2)
Pain13 (13)
The following covariates had an association of P < .05 and were included in the final multivariate regression model for hospital LOS (in days) as outcome: (Table 5)
Table 5

Multivariate linear regression analysis of length of stay (in days) as outcome with all covariates that have an association of P < .05.

CovariateMean Days,* ±SDP value*Model R2
Age, y
 ≤50 >50.001.48
Sex
 Male Female.011
Cardiac complication
 No Yes.002
Urinary complication
 No Yes<.001
Pulmonary complication
 No Yes<.001

Adjusted for other variables in the model.

Age: dichotomized at 50 years (coefficient = .851; P = .001) Sex: (coefficient = −.620; P = .011) Cardiac complication (coefficient = 1.58; P = .002) Urinary complication (coefficient = 2.77; P < .001) Pulmonary complication (coefficient = 3.45; P < .001) The overall multivariate model R2 was .48. Factors that contributed to increased LOS and their associated adjusted mean days were age ≥50 years (2.5 ± 1.2 days), female gender (2.3 ± 1.2 days), and three particular types of complications. The three types of complications that had the largest effect on increased LOS, from least to most severe, were: cardiac (3.5 ± 1.3 days); urinary (4.7 ± 1.3 days); and pulmonary (5.3 ± 1.3 days) (Table 5). No other factors listed in the covariates section in Tables Tables 1,2,3,4 were found to be significantly associated with hospital LOS. The presence of cervical spondylotic myelopathy was approaching significance (P = .068). Patient sampling and selection. Missing 11 height and 2 weight data points. Including myelopathy, radiculopathy, and myeloradiculopathy. Herniated disc, degenerative disc disease, spondylosis, osteophytes. UE indicates upper extremity; LE, lower extremity. NSAIDS indicates nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs; IV, intravenous. One patient had 700 mL blood loss and was treated with iron tid. Adjusted for other variables in the model. Individuals at our facility who had identical surgeries by the same surgeon were found to have very different LOS, with no clear-cut explanation for the difference. Most patients were discharged only one night after surgery, but others were discharged as long as five nights after surgery. We sought to identify the factors that contribute to increased LOS in postoperative patients having had ACDF, and to develop a plan to counteract and anticipate these factors to reduce LOS and to improve overall outcomes. The mean LOS for patients undergoing ACDF was 1.98 (±1.6) days. Complications, though rare, included uncontrolled postoperative pain (13%), cardiac (6%), pulmonary (4%), and urinary (3%). Because our study was not to determine overall safety of a procedure or device but rather to determine what types of events influence hospital LOS, we chose to document any event that could lead to an increased LOS, with the understanding that the event may not be considered severe. Therefore, the percentage of complications may be overestimated compared with those in other studies because our operational definitions had to be broad. Factors that contributed to increased LOS and their associated mean days were age ≥50 years, female gender, and three particular types of complications. The complications that had the largest effect on increased LOS from least to most severe were cardiac, urinary, and pulmonary. Castro et al2 noted that dysphagia indicated additional time in the hospital postoperatively, but there was no indication to how much more time. This particular study was the only reference to LOS that was found. Compared with the results of Castro et al, the rate of dysphagia in our study was lower, which we attribute to meticulous surgical technique as well as deflation of the endotracheal cuff during surgery. Studies that have reviewed the long-term outcomes of ACDF surgeries list complications, but none discussed how those complications contribute to an increased LOS. Garvey et al1 concluded that it was not possible to determine why individuals with the same anatomical findings or pathology continued to have symptoms after surgery, while others did not. Factors unrelated to the medical condition can influence hospital LOS, such as type and location of hospital, type of payer, and patient characteristics.3,4,5,6 Factors related to the patient and condition that can influence outcome after cervical spine surgery include: comorbidity;7,8,9,10 age, severity of the neurological deficit;10 preoperative myelopathy;11,12,13 pulmonary and cardiovascular disease, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus;12,14 smoking, alcohol use, body mass index;11 education level, length of surgery, number of fusion levels, dysphagia, incisional pain, urinary tract infection, septicemia, bleeding, and hypotension.2,15,16 Clinical myelopathy, age, and comorbidity are associated with a longer hospital LOS and critical care intervention after cervical spine surgery.7,8,12,17 In our study, the presence of cervical spondylotic myelopathy was approaching significance (P = .068), but was found not to be significantly associated with hospital LOS, therefore not included in the final model and estimates. Higher rates of complication are expected in patients having multilevel rather than single-level fusion because of more extensive dissection, longer operating time, and greater blood loss.17 In patients who have undergone surgical decompression for cervical degenerative disc disease, the factors associated with prolonged hospitalization and the need for postoperative critical care are preexisting myelopathy, multilevel decompression, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, pulmonary disease, and diabetes mellitus.12

Discussion

It is difficult to establish cause-and-effect using retrospective analysis. Such findings are subject to confounding bias because of known or unknown factors that influence outcomes that are not controlled. We collected as many variables as we could that we believed might have an impact on outcome. Retrospective studies are known for missing data, which can affect study validity. Only insurance data was missing in our analysis (n = 4) and these variables were not statistically significant. Since these data were not collected prospectively, there is also the possibility of misclassification of admitting diagnosis and other covariates included in the analysis. Such misclassification would likely not be systematic and therefore considered nondifferential. Nondifferential misclassification generally biases associations toward the null. Because we were predicting outcome after a single-treatment technique and not comparing treatment techniques, the effects of selection bias may influence generalizability (as opposed to biasing a treatment). That is, our patients may not be representative of the typical patients at other centers. That said, we enrolled a consecutive series of patients meeting the study criteria and we believe our study population represented the normal patient population that presents for ACDF. Even the process of interpreting and abstracting data from hospital charts and outpatient records creates potential variability in the collected data, even if abstracted by only one researcher.18 The quality of the information recorded may vary; however, there is no reason to believe this would be systematic. We found that for patients who have undergone ACDF, the prognostic factors that contribute to increased postoperative hospital LOS are older age, female gender, and three types of complications—cardiac, urinary, and pulmonary. The information presented in this study may be useful for patients, clinicians, and insurance companies, including precertification and case-management services. Our results can be instrumental in designing future prospective studies using more detailed analyses with more patients, more surgeons, and multiple institutions. A prediction model using registry data could also be performed to validate or refine these observations.
Final class of evidence (CoE)-treatmentYes
Study design:
 Prospective cohort
 Retrospective cohort
 Case control
 Case series
Methods
 Patients at similar point in course of treatment
 Follow-up ≥85%
 Similarity of treatment protocols for patient groups
 Patients followed-up long enough for outcomes to occur
 Control for extraneous risk factors
Overall class of evidenceII
The definiton of the different classes of evidence is available on page 59.
  18 in total

1.  A cost analysis of two anterior cervical fusion procedures.

Authors:  F P Castro; R T Holt; M Majd; T S Whitecloud
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  2000-12

2.  Chronic comorbidity and outcomes of hospital care: length of stay, mortality, and readmission at 30 and 365 days.

Authors:  J Librero; S Peiró; R Ordiñana
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Evaluation of morbidity, mortality and outcome following cervical spine injuries in elderly patients.

Authors:  S A Malik; M Murphy; P Connolly; J O'Byrne
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Prevalence, complications, and hospital charges associated with use of bone-morphogenetic proteins in spinal fusion procedures.

Authors:  Kevin S Cahill; John H Chi; Arthur Day; Elizabeth B Claus
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Outcome analysis of noninstrumented anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion in 348 patients.

Authors:  J C Cauthen; R E Kinard; J B Vogler; D E Jackson; O B DePaz; O L Hunter; L B Wasserburger; V M Williams
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Complications and mortality associated with cervical spine surgery for degenerative disease in the United States.

Authors:  Marjorie C Wang; Leighton Chan; Dennis J Maiman; William Kreuter; Richard A Deyo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Health outcome assessment before and after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for radiculopathy: a prospective analysis.

Authors:  G R Klein; A R Vaccaro; T J Albert
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Comorbid illness is associated with survival and length of hospital stay in patients with chronic disability. A prospective comparison of three comorbidity indices.

Authors:  P A Rochon; J N Katz; L A Morrow; R McGlinchey-Berroth; M M Ahlquist; M Sarkarati; K L Minaker
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  The impact of the day of the week and month of admission on the length of hospital stay in stroke patients.

Authors:  Wolf-Peter Schmidt; Dirk Taeger; Hans-Joachim Buecker-Nott; Klaus Berger
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.762

10.  Pathomechanism of myelopathy and surgical results of laminoplasty in elderly patients with cervical spondylosis.

Authors:  Yoshiharu Kawaguchi; Masahiko Kanamori; Hirokazu Ishihara; Kazuo Ohmori; Yumiko Abe; Tomoatsu Kimura
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  20 in total

1.  Choice and management of negative pressure drainage in anterior cervical surgery.

Authors:  Qi-Hang Su; Kai Zhu; Yong-Chao Li; Tao Chen; Yan Zhang; Jun Tan; Song Guo
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 1.337

2.  Surgical site infections following operative management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: prevalence, predictors of occurence, and influence on peri-operative outcomes.

Authors:  C M Jalai; N Worley; G W Poorman; D L Cruz; S Vira; P G Passias
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Preoperative factors affecting length of stay after elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with and without corpectomy: a multivariate analysis of an academic center cohort.

Authors:  Bryce A Basques; Daniel D Bohl; Nicholas S Golinvaux; Jordan A Gruskay; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Non-medical factors significantly influence the length of hospital stay after surgery for degenerative spine disorders.

Authors:  D Mai; C Brand; D Haschtmann; T Pirvu; T F Fekete; A F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-11-16       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Structural equation model analysis of the length-of-hospital stay after lumbar spine surgery.

Authors:  Saddam F Kanaan; Lemuel R Waitman; Hung-Wen Yeh; Paul M Arnold; Douglas C Burton; Neena K Sharma
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  Risk Factors for Medical and Surgical Complications after 1-2-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Procedures.

Authors:  Ankur S Narain; Fady Y Hijji; Brittany E Haws; Benjamin Khechen; Krishna T Kudaravalli; Kelly H Yom; Kern Singh
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-06-30

7.  Cervical fusion for adult patients with atlantoaxial rotatory subluxation.

Authors:  Eris Spirollari; Cameron Beaudreault; Christina Ng; Sima Vazquez; Emily Chapman; Kevin Clare; Richard Wang; Alexandria Naftchi; Ankita Das; Aiden Lui; Ariel Sacknovitz; Jose F Dominguez; Chirag D Gandhi; Rachana Tyagi; John K Houten; Merritt D Kinon
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2022-06

8.  Postoperative Complications Following Orthopedic Spine Surgery: Is There a Difference Between Men and Women?

Authors:  Jessica H Heyer; N A Cao; Richard L Amdur; Raj R Rao
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-04-30

9.  Factors associated with prolonged length of stay for elective hepatobiliary and neurosurgery patients: a retrospective medical record review.

Authors:  Siu Yin Lee; Soo-Hoon Lee; Jenny H H Tan; Howard S L Foo; Phillip H Phan; Alfred W C Kow; Sein Lwin; Penelope M Y Seah; Siti Zubaidah Mordiffi
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Clinical outcomes for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with silicon nitride spine cages: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Graham C Calvert; George VanBuren Huffmon; William M Rambo; Micah W Smith; Bryan J McEntire; B Sonny Bal
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.