Literature DB >> 32548150

Choice and management of negative pressure drainage in anterior cervical surgery.

Qi-Hang Su1, Kai Zhu1, Yong-Chao Li1, Tao Chen2, Yan Zhang1, Jun Tan1, Song Guo3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postoperative unobstructed drainage is an important measure for avoiding hematoma formation and preventing complications from anterior cervical surgery. AIM: To discuss the characteristics and key points of clinical management of two types of commonly used negative pressure drainage systems in clinical settings.
METHODS: Two types of commonly used silica gel negative pressure drainage balls and a type of gastrointestinal decompression apparatus were fully emptied and then injected with different amounts of water and air. Following this, the negative pressure values of the three devices were measured. Meanwhile, we undertook a retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 1328 patients who had been treated with different negative pressure drainage apparatuses during their anterior cervical surgery in our department between January 2007 and January 2018.
RESULTS: As the amount of injected air or water increased, the negative pressure of the silica gel negative pressure drainage ball decreased rapidly, dropping to zero when 150 mL of water or air was injected. In contrast, the negative pressure of gastrointestinal decompression apparatus decreased slowly, maintaining an ideal value even when 300 mL of water or air was injected. And statistical analysis demonstrated that patients who had been treated with the gastrointestinal decompression apparatus were less likely to develop severe complications than those who had been treated with the silica gel negative pressure drainage ball (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: This study showed that the gastrointestinal decompression apparatus has the advantages of large suction capacity, long duration of continuous negative pressure, and good drainage effect, all of which are the favorable factors for the use of this apparatus for negative pressure drainage in anterior cervical surgery. ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior cervical surgery; Drainage; Gastrointestinal decompression apparatus; Negative pressure; Silica gel negative pressure drainage ball; Spine

Year:  2020        PMID: 32548150      PMCID: PMC7281064          DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i11.2201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Clin Cases        ISSN: 2307-8960            Impact factor:   1.337


  24 in total

Review 1.  Negative-pressure wound therapy.

Authors:  Alex C Lesiak; Adam B Shafritz
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 2.230

2.  The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks. 1958.

Authors:  Ralph B Cloward
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2007-05

Review 3.  Negative pressure wound therapy: past, present and future.

Authors:  Dennis P Orgill; Lauren R Bayer
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Positive Axilla in Breast Cancer; Clinical Practice in 2018.

Authors:  Arda Işık; Arial Grassi; Atilla Soran
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2018-07-01

5.  Delayed hypopharyngeal and esophageal perforation after anterior spinal fusion: primary repair reinforced by pedicled pectoralis major flap.

Authors:  Wolfgang Pichler; Alfred Maier; Thomas Rappl; Hans Gunther Clement; Wolfgang Grechenig
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Incidence of dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery: a prospective study.

Authors:  Rajesh Bazaz; Michael J Lee; Jung U Yoo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Expression of MMP-8 in Pressure Injuries in Spinal Cord Injury Patients Managed by Negative Pressure Wound Therapy or Conventional Wound Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Mukesh Kumar Dwivedi; Amit Kumar Bhagat; Rajeshwar Nath Srivastava; Amita Jain; Kavita Baghel; Saloni Raj
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2017 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 1.741

Review 8.  Complications of anterior cervical discectomy without fusion in 450 consecutive patients.

Authors:  H Bertalanffy; H R Eggert
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 9.  Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery for Degenerative Disease: A Review.

Authors:  Taku Sugawara
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 1.742

10.  Factors affecting hospital length of stay following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Paul M Arnold; Lisa R Rice; Karen K Anderson; Joan K McMahon; Lynne M Connelly; Daniel C Norvell
Journal:  Evid Based Spine Care J       Date:  2011-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.