Literature DB >> 23530488

Diagnostic accuracy of left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with myocardial infarction by computer-assisted electrocardiography (ELECTROPRES).

Luis Rodríguez-Padial1, Finn Akerström, Carolina Robles-Gamboa, Josep Andrés, Jessica Ruiz-Baena.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Information is limited about the classification accuracy of electrocardiographic (ECG) criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in the presence of myocardial infarction (MI).
METHODS: We evaluated LVH classification accuracy for a set of 16 ECG criteria and some combinations derived from them in 1642 patients (105 with MI) suspected of coronary heart disease with two-dimensional echocardiography evaluation and a standard 12-lead ECG recorded at the same time. Patients with left bundle branch block had previously been excluded. Measures of classification accuracy included sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and positive and negative predictive values.
RESULTS: Diagnostic accuracy varied widely for different LVH criteria. The criteria with the best overall performance had highest sensitivity in the presence of MI and sensitivities of approximately 30% with relatively low specificities ranging from 72% to 78%. However, the classification accuracy for them was similar to that for patients without MI. The prevalence of LVH in patients with MI was higher (56%) than in those with no MI (31%). Classification accuracy of the best single previously published LVH criteria was comparable to that of the best combinations of any three of them.
CONCLUSIONS: The classification accuracy of LVH criteria in the presence of MI is comparable to that in patients without MI, in part possibly due to the higher LVH prevalence in the MI group. The presence of a well-validated computer database facilitates comparative evaluation of ECG-LVH criteria and derivation of optimal combinations of criteria for any given clinical application. ©2012, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23530488      PMCID: PMC6932437          DOI: 10.1111/anec.12009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol        ISSN: 1082-720X            Impact factor:   1.468


  17 in total

1.  Echocardiographic and electrocardiographic diagnoses of left ventricular hypertrophy predict mortality independently of each other in a population of elderly men.

Authors:  J Sundström; L Lind; J Arnlöv; B Zethelius; B Andrén; H O Lithell
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Evaluation of ECG interpretation results obtained by computer and cardiologists.

Authors:  J L Willems; C Abreu-Lima; P Arnaud; C R Brohet; B Denis; J Gehring; I Graham; G van Herpen; H Machado; J Michaelis
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.176

3.  Echocardiographic determination of left ventricular mass in man. Anatomic validation of the method.

Authors:  R B Devereux; N Reichek
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy findings.

Authors:  R B Devereux; D R Alonso; E M Lutas; G J Gottlieb; E Campo; I Sachs; N Reichek
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1986-02-15       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Diagnostic accuracy of computer-assisted electrocardiography in the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in left bundle branch block.

Authors:  Luis Rodríguez-Padial; Blanca Rodríguez-Picón; Miguel Jerez-Valero; Julio Casares-Medrano; Finn O Akerström; Alberto Calderon; Vivencio Barrios; Antonio Sarría-Santamera; José R González-Juanatey; Antonio Coca; Josep Andrés; Jessica Ruiz-Baena
Journal:  Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed)       Date:  2011-11-17

6.  Guidelines for management of hypertension: report of the fourth working party of the British Hypertension Society, 2004-BHS IV.

Authors:  B Williams; N R Poulter; M J Brown; M Davis; G T McInnes; J F Potter; P S Sever; S McG Thom
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.012

7.  [Interobserver agreement on electrocardiographic diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients in Andalusia. PREHVIA study].

Authors:  Enrique Martín-Rioboó; Amador López Granados; Luis Cea Calvo; Luis Angel Pérula De Torres; Emilio García Criado; Manuel P Anguita Sánchez; Lisardo García Matarín; Rafael Molina Díaz; Tomas Ureña Fernández
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2009-04-26       Impact factor: 1.137

8.  The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report.

Authors:  Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Prevalence and natural history of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy.

Authors:  W B Kannel
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1983-09-26       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  The diagnostic performance of computer programs for the interpretation of electrocardiograms.

Authors:  J L Willems; C Abreu-Lima; P Arnaud; J H van Bemmel; C Brohet; R Degani; B Denis; J Gehring; I Graham; G van Herpen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-12-19       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  2 in total

1.  Determining the clinical significance of computer interpreted electrocardiography conclusions.

Authors:  Daniel J Kersten; Kyla D'Angelo; Juana Vargas; Gagan Verma; Uzma Malik; Schlomo Shavolian; Roman Zeltser; Ofek Hai; Amgad N Makaryus
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2021-06-15

2.  Progression of Renal Insufficiency in Patients with Essential Hypertension Treated with Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone System Blockers: An Electrocardiographic Correlation.

Authors:  Luis Rodriguez-Padial; Finn Akerström; María G Barderas; Fernando Vivanco; Miguel A Arias; Julian Segura; Luis M Ruilope
Journal:  Diseases       Date:  2017-12-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.