Literature DB >> 22100804

Diagnostic accuracy of computer-assisted electrocardiography in the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in left bundle branch block.

Luis Rodríguez-Padial1, Blanca Rodríguez-Picón, Miguel Jerez-Valero, Julio Casares-Medrano, Finn O Akerström, Alberto Calderon, Vivencio Barrios, Antonio Sarría-Santamera, José R González-Juanatey, Antonio Coca, Josep Andrés, Jessica Ruiz-Baena.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND
OBJECTIVES: Left ventricular hypertrophy has important prognostic implications. Although electrocardiography is the technique most often recommended in the diagnosis of hypertrophy, its diagnostic accuracy is hampered in the presence of a left bundle branch block.
METHODS: In 1875 consecutive patients (56±16 years) undergoing studies to rule out heart disease and/or hypertension, 2-dimensional echocardiography and electrocardiography were performed simultaneously in an outpatient clinic. Digitized electrocardiograms were interpreted using an online computer-assisted platform (ELECTROPRES). Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and predictive values of standard electrocardiographic criteria and of some diagnostic algorithms for left ventricular hypertrophy were determined and compared with the findings in patients with neither left bundle branch block nor myocardial infarction.
RESULTS: Left bundle branch block was present in 233 (12%) patients. Left ventricular hypertrophy was detected more frequently in patients with left bundle branch block (60% vs 31%). In patients with left bundle branch block, sensitivities were low but similar to those observed in patients without it, and ranged from 6.4% to 70.9%, whereas specificities were high, ranging from 57.6% to 100%. Positive likelihood ratios ranged from 1.33 to 4.94, and negative likelihood ratios from 0.50 to 0.98. Diagnostic algorithms, voltage-duration products, and certain compound criteria had the best sensitivities.
CONCLUSIONS: Left ventricular hypertrophy can be diagnosed in the presence of left bundle branch block with an accuracy at least similar to that observed in patients without this conduction defect. Computer-assisted interpretation of the electrocardiogram may be useful in the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy as it enables the implementation of more accurate algorithms.
Copyright © 2011 Sociedad Española de Cardiología. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22100804     DOI: 10.1016/j.recesp.2011.07.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed)        ISSN: 1885-5857


  6 in total

1.  Relationship between electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy criteria and vascular structure and function parameters in hypertensive patients.

Authors:  M A Gómez-Marcos; J I Recio-Rodríguez; M C Patino-Alonso; C Agudo-Conde; E Rodríguez-Sánchez; L Gómez-Sánchez; M Gómez-Sánchez; L García-Ortiz
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 3.012

2.  Diagnostic accuracy of left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with myocardial infarction by computer-assisted electrocardiography (ELECTROPRES).

Authors:  Luis Rodríguez-Padial; Finn Akerström; Carolina Robles-Gamboa; Josep Andrés; Jessica Ruiz-Baena
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Determining the clinical significance of computer interpreted electrocardiography conclusions.

Authors:  Daniel J Kersten; Kyla D'Angelo; Juana Vargas; Gagan Verma; Uzma Malik; Schlomo Shavolian; Roman Zeltser; Ofek Hai; Amgad N Makaryus
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2021-06-15

4.  Progression of Renal Insufficiency in Patients with Essential Hypertension Treated with Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone System Blockers: An Electrocardiographic Correlation.

Authors:  Luis Rodriguez-Padial; Finn Akerström; María G Barderas; Fernando Vivanco; Miguel A Arias; Julian Segura; Luis M Ruilope
Journal:  Diseases       Date:  2017-12-08

5.  Usefulness of ECG criteria to rule out left ventricular hypertrophy in older individuals with true left bundle branch block: an observational study.

Authors:  Caio Assis Moura Tavares; Nelson Samesima; Felippe Lazar Neto; Ludhmila Abrahão Hajjar; Lucas C Godoy; Eduardo Messias Hirano Padrão; Mirella Facin; Wilson Jacob Filho; Michael E Farkouh; Carlos Alberto Pastore
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 6.  The Vectorcardiogram and the Main Dromotropic Disturbances.

Authors:  Andrés R Pérez-Riera; Raimundo Barbosa-Barros; Rodrigo Daminello-Raimundo; Luiz C de Abreu; Kjell Nikus
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2021
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.