Literature DB >> 15551403

On the efficiency of targeted clinical trials.

A Maitournam1, R Simon.   

Abstract

The development of genomics-based technologies is demonstrating that many common diseases are heterogeneous collections of molecularly distinct entities. Molecularly targeted therapeutics is often effective only for some subsets patients with a conventionally defined disease. We consider the problem of design of phase III randomized clinical trials for the evaluation of a molecularly targeted treatment when there is an assay predictive of which patients will be more responsive to the experimental treatment than to the control regimen. We compare the conventional randomized clinical trial design to a design based on randomizing only patients predicted to preferentially benefit from the new treatment. Trial designs are compared based on the required number of randomized patients and the expected number of patients screened for randomization eligibility. Relative efficiency depends upon the distribution of treatment effect across patient subsets, prevalence of the subset of patients who respond preferentially to the experimental treatment, and assay performance. Copyright 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15551403     DOI: 10.1002/sim.1975

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  59 in total

1.  Requiring an amyloid-beta1-42 biomarker for prodromal Alzheimer's disease or mild cognitive impairment does not lead to more efficient clinical trials.

Authors:  Lon S Schneider; Richard E Kennedy; Gary R Cutter
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 21.566

Review 2.  Complement pathway biomarkers and age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  M Gemenetzi; A J Lotery
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Clinical trials for predictive medicine: new challenges and paradigms.

Authors:  Richard Simon
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 2.486

4.  Development and Validation of Biomarker Classifiers for Treatment Selection.

Authors:  Richard Simon
Journal:  J Stat Plan Inference       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 1.111

5.  Simulating effects of biomarker enrichment on Alzheimer's disease prevention trials: conceptual framework and example.

Authors:  Jeannie-Marie S Leoutsakos; Alexandra L Bartlett; Sarah N Forrester; Constantine G Lyketsos
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 21.566

6.  Run-in phase III trial design with pharmacodynamics predictive biomarkers.

Authors:  Fangxin Hong; Richard Simon
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 7.  Radiation-agent combinations for glioblastoma: challenges in drug development and future considerations.

Authors:  Charles A Kunos; Evanthia Galanis; Jeffrey Buchsbaum; Qian Shi; Lewis C Strauss; C Norman Coleman; Mansoor M Ahmed
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  Phase II cancer clinical trials for biomarker-guided treatments.

Authors:  Sin-Ho Jung
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 1.051

9.  Bayesian predictive modeling for genomic based personalized treatment selection.

Authors:  Junsheng Ma; Francesco C Stingo; Brian P Hobbs
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Characteristics of clinical trials that require participants to be fluent in English.

Authors:  Brian L Egleston; Omar Pedraza; Yu-Ning Wong; Roland L Dunbrack; Candace L Griffin; Eric A Ross; J Robert Beck
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 2.486

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.