Literature DB >> 23523292

Comparative analysis of oncologic outcomes of partial ureterectomy vs radical nephroureterectomy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Aditya Bagrodia1, Franklin E Kuehhas, Bishoy A Gayed, Christopher G Wood, Jay D Raman, Payal Kapur, Ithaar H Derweesh, Karim Bensalah, Arthur I Sagalowsky, Shahrokh F Shariat, Yair Lotan, Vitaly Margulis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare oncologic outcomes in an international cohort of patients who underwent either partial ureterectomy (PU) or radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).
METHODS: A subgroup of patients from the UTUC Collaboration with operation classified as PU or RNU was used (n = 835). Clinicopathologic outcomes were evaluated. Survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression addressed recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).
RESULTS: Median age and follow-up were 69 years (range 32-97 years) and 34 months (range 1-246 months), respectively. Relapse occurred in 28.5% of patients (19.6% local, 8.9% systemic). At analysis, 180 patients (21.6%) died of UTUC. Eighty-one patients (9.7%) underwent PU and 754 (90.3%) underwent RNU. High tumor grade (77.3% vs 55.6%, P <.001) and advanced T stage (>T1, 41.7% vs 30.9%, P <.001) were significantly more common in the RNU cohort. Significantly more patients in the PU group received adjuvant chemotherapy than the RNU arm (25.9% vs 16.8%, respectively, P = .05). Kaplan-Meier median 5-year survival probabilities for RFS (69.4% vs 75.9%, P = .06) and CSS (67.5% vs 72.1%, P = .06) were not significantly different between PU and RNU. On multivariable analysis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, tumor stage, tumor necrosis, and lymph node (LN) status were significantly associated with CSS.
CONCLUSION: In patients with UTUC, PU seems to provide oncologic efficacy equal to RNU. Ability to maximize global renal function with utilization of PU is an attractive strategy in carefully selected patients.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23523292     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.12.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  15 in total

1.  Oncological and renal outcomes of segmental ureterectomy vs. radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Tomonori Kato; Ryo Nakayama; Tomomi Haba; Makoto Kawaguchi; Akira Komiya; Hiroshi Koike
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 2.  Prognostic factors and predictive tools for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review.

Authors:  Aurélie Mbeutcha; Morgan Rouprêt; Ashish M Kamat; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Giacomo Novara; Jay D Raman; Christian Seitz; Evanguelos Xylinas; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Transitional cell carcinoma arising in a calyceal cyst mimicking a cystic renal tumour.

Authors:  Jeong Ho Kim; Joo Yeon Song; Wan Lee
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  A patient with synchronous bilateral low-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma who underwent nephroureterectomy and total ureterectomy with ileal ureteric replacement.

Authors:  Yoshinori Matsuda; Takamitsu Inoue; Atsushi Maeno; Atsushi Koizumi; Ryohei Yamamoto; Taketoshi Nara; Sohei Kanda; Kazuyuki Numakura; Mitsuru Saito; Shintaro Narita; Shigeru Satoh; Tomonori Habuchi
Journal:  Int Cancer Conf J       Date:  2020-03-03

Review 5.  Risk-adapted strategy for the kidney-sparing management of upper tract tumours.

Authors:  Thomas Seisen; Pierre Colin; Morgan Rouprêt
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  TALL score for prediction of oncological outcomes after radical nephroureterectomy for high-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Ramy F Youssef; Laura-Maria Krabbe; Shahrokh F Shariat; Yair Lotan; Arthur I Sagalowsky; Jay Raman; Christopher G Wood; Alon Weizer; Marco Roscigno; Francesco Montorsi; Christian Bolenz; Mesut Remzi; Karim Bensalah; Wassim Kassouf; Vitaly Margulis
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  The role of systemic chemotherapy in management of upper tract urothelial cancer.

Authors:  Bishoy A Gayed; Gregory R Thoreson; Vitaly Margulis
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 8.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological and renal function outcomes obtained after segmental ureterectomy versus radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  D Fang; T Seisen; K Yang; P Liu; X Fan; N Singla; G Xiong; L Zhang; X Li; L Zhou
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 4.424

9.  Single-dose intravesical chemotherapy after nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Eu Chang Hwang; Niranjan J Sathianathen; Jae Hung Jung; Myung Ha Kim; Philipp Dahm; Michael C Risk
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-05-18

Review 10.  Predictive models and prognostic factors for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a comprehensive review of the literature.

Authors:  Aurélie Mbeutcha; Romain Mathieu; Morgan Rouprêt; Kilian M Gust; Alberto Briganti; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2016-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.