Literature DB >> 23523238

Patient and caregiver knowledge and utilization of partial versus radical nephrectomy: results of a national kidney foundation survey to assess educational needs of kidney cancer patients and caregivers.

Paul Russo1, Lynda A Szczech, Gail S Torres, Marilyn D Swartz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In response to requests from patients, caregivers, and physicians for information on kidney cancer, the National Kidney Foundation (NKF) conducted a survey to assess the educational needs of the kidney cancer community. Key areas of assessment were patient and caregiver knowledge of risk factors for chronic kidney disease (CKD), including kidney cancer and nephrectomy, and of kidney-sparing surgical options. STUDY
DESIGN: Survey to assess educational needs of patients with kidney cancer and caregivers. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Respondents were invited through physician referrals and online sources and included 365 adult patients with kidney cancer and 52 caregivers. PREDICTOR: Age, geographic region, and cancer stages 1-2 versus 3-4. OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS: Survey responses were descriptively analyzed, with data compared and weighted to the population age and geographic characteristics of the general kidney cancer population.
RESULTS: 83% of 181 early-stage patients, 92% of 123 late-stage patients, and 86% of 113 patients who did not know their stage received radical nephrectomy. Although 62% agreed that radical nephrectomy for cancer treatment is a risk factor for CKD, only 40% agreed that losing part or all of 1 kidney from injury or a disease other than cancer is a risk factor for CKD. 56% agreed that kidney cancer can be related to CKD. LIMITATIONS: We did not have patient medical records to validate responses and we do not know the number of people who were invited to take the survey but declined.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of patient awareness that kidney cancer and radical nephrectomy are risk factors for CKD. Only a minority of patients underwent partial nephrectomy or were given it as an option for their early-stage kidney cancer. This suggests a knowledge deficit among physicians, surgeons, patients, and caregivers alike that there is a bidirectional relationship between kidney cancer and CKD and that kidney-sparing surgery is preferable when feasible.
Copyright © 2013 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23523238     DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.01.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis        ISSN: 0272-6386            Impact factor:   8.860


  3 in total

1.  Validation of 3D volumetric-based renal function prediction calculator for nephron sparing surgery.

Authors:  Renato Corradi; Aashish Kabra; Melissa Suarez; Jacob Oppenheimer; Zhamshid Okhunov; Hugh White; Stephanie Nougaret; Hebert A Vargas; Jaime Landman; Jonathan Coleman; Michael A Liss
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Parenchymal Volumetric Assessment as a Predictive Tool to Determine Renal Function Benefit of Nephron-Sparing Surgery Compared with Radical Nephrectomy.

Authors:  Michael A Liss; Robert DeConde; Dominique Caovan; Joseph Hofler; Michael Gabe; Kerrin L Palazzi; Nishant D Patel; Hak J Lee; Trey Ideker; Hendrik Van Poppel; David Karow; Michael Aertsen; Giovanna Casola; Ithaar H Derweesh
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 3.  Shared decision-making in urology and female pelvic floor medicine and reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  David A Ossin; Emily C Carter; Rufus Cartwright; Philippe D Violette; Shilpa Iyer; Geraldine T Klein; Sangeeta Senapati; Zachary Klaassen; Sylvia M Botros
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 14.432

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.