PURPOSE: To develop a preoperative prediction model using a computer-assisted volumetric assessment of potential spared parenchyma to estimate the probability of chronic kidney disease (CKD, estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) 6 months from extirpative renal surgery (nephron-sparing surgery [NSS] or radical nephrectomy [RN]). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent NSS or RN at our institution from January 2000 to June 2013 with a compatible CT scan 6-month renal function follow-up was performed. Primary outcome was defined as the accuracy of 6-month postoperative eGFR compared with actual postoperative eGFR based on root mean square error (RMSE). Models were constructed using renal volumes and externally validated. A clinical tool was developed on the best model after a given surgical procedure using area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: We identified 130 (51 radical, 79 partial) patients with a median age of 58 years (interquartile range [IQR] 48-67) and preoperative eGFR of 82.1 (IQR 65.9-104.3); postoperative CKD (eGFR <60) developed in 42% (55/130). We performed various linear regression models to predict postoperative eGFR. The Quadratic model was the highest performing model, which relied only on preoperative GFR and the volumetric data for a RMSE of 15.3 on external validation corresponding to a clinical tool with an AUC of 0.89. CONCLUSION: Volumetric-based assessment provides information to predict postoperative eGFR. A tool based on this equation may assist surgical counseling regarding renal functional outcomes before renal tumor surgical procedures.
PURPOSE: To develop a preoperative prediction model using a computer-assisted volumetric assessment of potential spared parenchyma to estimate the probability of chronic kidney disease (CKD, estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) 6 months from extirpative renal surgery (nephron-sparing surgery [NSS] or radical nephrectomy [RN]). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent NSS or RN at our institution from January 2000 to June 2013 with a compatible CT scan 6-month renal function follow-up was performed. Primary outcome was defined as the accuracy of 6-month postoperative eGFR compared with actual postoperative eGFR based on root mean square error (RMSE). Models were constructed using renal volumes and externally validated. A clinical tool was developed on the best model after a given surgical procedure using area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: We identified 130 (51 radical, 79 partial) patients with a median age of 58 years (interquartile range [IQR] 48-67) and preoperative eGFR of 82.1 (IQR 65.9-104.3); postoperative CKD (eGFR <60) developed in 42% (55/130). We performed various linear regression models to predict postoperative eGFR. The Quadratic model was the highest performing model, which relied only on preoperative GFR and the volumetric data for a RMSE of 15.3 on external validation corresponding to a clinical tool with an AUC of 0.89. CONCLUSION: Volumetric-based assessment provides information to predict postoperative eGFR. A tool based on this equation may assist surgical counseling regarding renal functional outcomes before renal tumor surgical procedures.
Authors: Conrad M Tobert; Bradley Boelkins; Shannon Culver; Leena Mammen; Richard J Kahnoski; Brian R Lane Journal: J Urol Date: 2013-11-07 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Steven C Campbell; Andrew C Novick; Arie Belldegrun; Michael L Blute; George K Chow; Ithaar H Derweesh; Martha M Faraday; Jihad H Kaouk; Raymond J Leveillee; Surena F Matin; Paul Russo; Robert G Uzzo Journal: J Urol Date: 2009-08-14 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Hendrik Van Poppel; Luigi Da Pozzo; Walter Albrecht; Vsevolod Matveev; Aldo Bono; Andrzej Borkowski; Jean-Marie Marechal; Laurence Klotz; Eila Skinner; Thomas Keane; Ilse Claessens; Richard Sylvester Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2006-11-15 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Maria C Mir; Rebecca A Campbell; Nidhi Sharma; Erick M Remer; Matt N Simmons; Jianbo Li; Sevag Demirjian; Jihad Kaouk; Steven C Campbell Journal: Urology Date: 2013-06-20 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: John M Hollingsworth; David C Miller; Stephanie Daignault; Brent K Hollenbeck Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2006-09-20 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Emil Scosyrev; Edward M Messing; Richard Sylvester; Steven Campbell; Hendrik Van Poppel Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2013-07-02 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Jeffrey M Woldrich; Kerrin Palazzi; Sean P Stroup; Roger L Sur; J Kellogg Parsons; David Chang; Ithaar H Derweesh Journal: BJU Int Date: 2013-03-07 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Nityam Rathi; Yosuke Yasuda; Worapat Attawettayanon; Diego A Palacios; Yunlin Ye; Jianbo Li; Christopher Weight; Mohammed Eltemamy; Tarik Benidir; Robert Abouassaly; Steven C Campbell Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2022-07-17 Impact factor: 2.266
Authors: Nityam Rathi; Yosuke Yasuda; Diego Aguilar Palacios; Worapat Attawettayanon; Jianbo Li; Bimal Bhindi; R Houston Thompson; Michael A Liss; Ithaar H Derweesh; Christopher J Weight; Mohammed Eltemamy; Robert Abouassaly; Steven C Campbell Journal: Eur Urol Open Sci Date: 2022-05-05