Literature DB >> 23523079

A longitudinal study of Type-B aortic dissection and endovascular repair scenarios: computational analyses.

Duanduan Chen1, Matthias Müller-Eschner, Drosos Kotelis, Dittmar Böckler, Yiannis Ventikos, Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk.   

Abstract

Conservative medical treatment is commonly first recommended for patients with uncomplicated Type-B aortic dissection (AD). However, if dissection-related complications occur, endovascular repair or open surgery is performed. Here we establish computational models of AD based on radiological three-dimensional images of a patient at initial presentation and after 4-years of best medical treatment (BMT). Computational fluid dynamics analyses are performed to quantitatively investigate the hemodynamic features of AD. Entry and re-entries (functioning as entries and outlets) are identified in the initial and follow-up models, and obvious variations of the inter-luminal flow exchange are revealed. Computational studies indicate that the reduction of blood pressure in BMT patients lowers pressure and wall shear stress in the thoracic aorta in general, and flattens the pressure distribution on the outer wall of the dissection, potentially reducing the progressive enlargement of the false lumen. Finally, scenario studies of endovascular aortic repair are conducted. The results indicate that, for patients with multiple tears, stent-grafts occluding all re-entries would be required to effectively reduce inter-luminal blood communication and thus induce thrombosis in the false lumen. This implicates that computational flow analyses may identify entries and relevant re-entries between true and false lumen and potentially assist in stent-graft planning.
Copyright © 2013 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aorta; Computational fluid dynamics; Dissection; Hemodynamics; Stent-graft

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23523079     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2013.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  14 in total

1.  The risk of stanford type-A aortic dissection with different tear size and location: a numerical study.

Authors:  Yue Shi; Minjia Zhu; Yu Chang; Huanyu Qiao; Yongmin Liu
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 2.819

2.  Multilayer flow modulator enhances vital organ perfusion in patients with type B aortic dissection.

Authors:  Farhad Rikhtegar Nezami; Lambros S Athanasiou; Junedh M Amrute; Elazer R Edelman
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 4.733

3.  Importance of dynamic aortic evaluation in planning TEVAR.

Authors:  Guido H W van Bogerijen; Joost A van Herwaarden; Michele Conti; Ferdinando Auricchio; Vincenzo Rampoldi; Santi Trimarchi; Frans L Moll
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-05

4.  Functional Evaluation of Embedded Modular Single-Branched Stent Graft: Application to Type B Aortic Dissection With Aberrant Right Subclavian Artery.

Authors:  Xuehuan Zhang; Duanduan Chen; Mingwei Wu; Huiwu Dong; Zhengdong Wan; Heyue Jia; Shichao Liang; Jun Shao; Jun Zheng; Shangdong Xu; Jiang Xiong; Wei Guo
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-05-02

5.  The Necessity to Seal the Re-Entry Tears of Aortic Dissection After TEVAR: A Hemodynamic Indicator.

Authors:  Zhenfeng Li; Huanming Xu; Chlöe Harriet Armour; Yuze Guo; Jiang Xiong; Xiaoyun Xu; Duanduan Chen
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-03-31

6.  Aortic dissection simulation models for clinical support: fluid-structure interaction vs. rigid wall models.

Authors:  Mona Alimohammadi; Joseph M Sherwood; Morad Karimpour; Obiekezie Agu; Stavroula Balabani; Vanessa Díaz-Zuccarini
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 7.  A perspective review on numerical simulations of hemodynamics in aortic dissection.

Authors:  Wan Naimah Wan Ab Naim; Poo Balan Ganesan; Zhonghua Sun; Kok Han Chee; Shahrul Amry Hashim; Einly Lim
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-02-03

Review 8.  Computational fluid dynamics modelling in cardiovascular medicine.

Authors:  Paul D Morris; Andrew Narracott; Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk; Daniel Alejandro Silva Soto; Sarah Hsiao; Angela Lungu; Paul Evans; Neil W Bressloff; Patricia V Lawford; D Rodney Hose; Julian P Gunn
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Multi-modality image-based computational analysis of haemodynamics in aortic dissection.

Authors:  Desmond Dillon-Murphy; Alia Noorani; David Nordsletten; C Alberto Figueroa
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2015-09-28

10.  Computational tools for clinical support: a multi-scale compliant model for haemodynamic simulations in an aortic dissection based on multi-modal imaging data.

Authors:  Mirko Bonfanti; Stavroula Balabani; John P Greenwood; Sapna Puppala; Shervanthi Homer-Vanniasinkam; Vanessa Díaz-Zuccarini
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.