Literature DB >> 23522983

Errors in dual-energy X-ray scanning of the hip because of nonuniform fat distribution.

Peter Tothill1, Nicholas Weir2, John Loveland2.   

Abstract

The variable proportion of fat in overlying soft tissue is a potential source of error in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements of bone mineral. The effect on spine scanning has previously been assessed from cadaver studies and from computed tomography (CT) scans of soft tissue distribution. We have now applied the latter technique to DXA hip scanning. The CT scans performed for clinical purposes were used to derive mean adipose tissue thicknesses over bone and background areas for total hip and femoral neck. The former was always lower. More importantly, the fat thickness differences varied among subjects. Errors because of bone marrow fat were deduced from CT measurements of marrow thickness and assumed fat proportions of marrow. The effect of these differences on measured bone mineral density was deduced from phantom measurements of the bone equivalence of fat. Uncertainties of around 0.06g/cm(2) are similar to those previously reported for spine scanning and the results from cadaver measurements. They should be considered in assessing the diagnostic accuracy of DXA scanning.
Copyright © 2014 The International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; fat; hip

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23522983     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2013.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.617


  9 in total

1.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry underestimates in vivo lumbar spine bone mineral density in overweight rats.

Authors:  Rim Cherif; Laurence Vico; Norbert Laroche; Mohsen Sakly; Nebil Attia; Cedric Lavet
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Precision of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the knee and heel: methodology and implications for research to reduce bone mineral loss after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  W T Peppler; W J Kim; K Ethans; K C Cowley
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  Long-Term and Recent Weight Change Are Associated With Reduced Peripheral Bone Density, Deficits in Bone Microarchitecture, and Decreased Bone Strength: The Framingham Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  Ching-Ti Liu; Shivani Sahni; Hanfei Xu; Robert R McLean; Kerry E Broe; Marian T Hannan; Steven K Boyd; Mary L Bouxsein; Douglas P Kiel; Elizabeth J Samelson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Body composition and bone mineral density in childhood.

Authors:  Lisa B Rokoff; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Karen M Switkowski; Jessica G Young; Clifford J Rosen; Emily Oken; Abby F Fleisch
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  The measurement of liver fat from single-energy quantitative computed tomography scans.

Authors:  Xiaoguang Cheng; Glen M Blake; J Keenan Brown; Zhe Guo; Jun Zhou; Fengzhe Wang; Liqiang Yang; Xiaohong Wang; Li Xu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2017-06

6.  Changes in Vertebral Marrow Fat Fraction Using 3D Fat Analysis & Calculation Technique Imaging Sequence in Aromatase Inhibitor-Treated Breast Cancer Women.

Authors:  Taihu Wan; Yuhang Zhu; Qinghe Han; Lin Liu
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 6.055

Review 7.  New perspectives in echographic diagnosis of osteoporosis on hip and spine.

Authors:  Sergio Casciaro; Francesco Conversano; Paola Pisani; Maurizio Muratore
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2015-10-26

Review 8.  Changes in volumetric bone mineral density and bone quality after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: A meta-analysis with meta-regression.

Authors:  Alba Hernández-Martínez; Lucas Veras; Giorjines Boppre; Alberto Soriano-Maldonado; José Oliveira; Florêncio Diniz-Sousa; Hélder Fonseca
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 10.867

9.  Quantitative computed tomographic evaluation of bone mineral density in beagle dogs: comparison with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry as a gold standard.

Authors:  Danbee Kwon; Jaehwan Kim; Hyeeun Lee; Byeol Kim; HyunHee Han; HyunJu Oh; MinJung Kim; Hakyoung Yoon; ByeongChun Lee; Kidong Eom
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 1.267

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.