STUDY OBJECTIVE: We evaluate the cost-effectiveness of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based rapid influenza testing and treatment for influenza in adult emergency department (ED) patients who are at high risk for or have evidence of influenza-related complications. METHODS: We developed a cost-utility decision analysis model that assessed adult patients presenting to the ED with symptoms of an acute respiratory infection, who met the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria for recommended antiviral treatment. Analysis was performed from the societal perspective, with incremental comparisons of 4 influenza testing and treatment strategies: treat none, treat according to provider judgment, treat according to results of a PCR-based rapid diagnostic test, and treat all. RESULTS: Treating no patients with antivirals was dominated by all other strategies that increased in both cost and benefit in the following order: treat according to provider judgment, treat according to results of a PCR-based rapid diagnostic test, and treat all. As influenza prevalence increases, treating all patients eventually dominated all other options. CONCLUSION: The economic benefit of incorporating use of rapid PCR-based influenza testing for ED patients at risk of developing influenza-related complications depends on influenza prevalence; treatment guided by physician diagnosis or rapid testing, and treatment of all patients is more effective and less costly than no treatment.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: We evaluate the cost-effectiveness of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based rapid influenza testing and treatment for influenza in adult emergency department (ED) patients who are at high risk for or have evidence of influenza-related complications. METHODS: We developed a cost-utility decision analysis model that assessed adult patients presenting to the ED with symptoms of an acute respiratory infection, who met the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria for recommended antiviral treatment. Analysis was performed from the societal perspective, with incremental comparisons of 4 influenza testing and treatment strategies: treat none, treat according to provider judgment, treat according to results of a PCR-based rapid diagnostic test, and treat all. RESULTS: Treating no patients with antivirals was dominated by all other strategies that increased in both cost and benefit in the following order: treat according to provider judgment, treat according to results of a PCR-based rapid diagnostic test, and treat all. As influenza prevalence increases, treating all patients eventually dominated all other options. CONCLUSION: The economic benefit of incorporating use of rapid PCR-based influenza testing for ED patients at risk of developing influenza-related complications depends on influenza prevalence; treatment guided by physician diagnosis or rapid testing, and treatment of all patients is more effective and less costly than no treatment.
Authors: Anthony R Sambol; Peter C Iwen; Maura Pieretti; Samik Basu; Michael H Levi; Kimberly D Gilonske; Kimberly D Moses; Jamie L Marola; Preveen Ramamoorthy Journal: J Clin Virol Date: 2010-06-26 Impact factor: 3.168
Authors: Barbara Donner; Silvia Bader-Weder; Roman Schwarz; Michael M Peng; James Robert Smith; Viswanathan Niranjan Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Bruce Y Lee; Sarah M McGlone; Rachel R Bailey; Ann E Wiringa; Shanta M Zimmer; Kenneth J Smith; Richard K Zimmerman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-06-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Scott A Harper; John S Bradley; Janet A Englund; Thomas M File; Stefan Gravenstein; Frederick G Hayden; Allison J McGeer; Kathleen M Neuzil; Andrew T Pavia; Michael L Tapper; Timothy M Uyeki; Richard K Zimmerman Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2009-04-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Helen Y Chu; Janet A Englund; Dandi Huang; Emily Scott; Jeanne D Chan; Rupali Jain; Paul S Pottinger; John B Lynch; Timothy H Dellit; Keith R Jerome; Jane Kuypers Journal: J Med Virol Date: 2015-06-12 Impact factor: 2.327
Authors: John E Schneider; Jonathan Romanowsky; Philipp Schuetz; Ivana Stojanovic; Henry K Cheng; Oliver Liesenfeld; Ljubomir Buturovic; Timothy E Sweeney Journal: J Health Econ Outcomes Res Date: 2020-04-29
Authors: Mary Louise Lindegren; Marie R Griffin; John V Williams; Kathryn M Edwards; Yuwei Zhu; Ed Mitchel; Alicia M Fry; William Schaffner; H Keipp Talbot Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-03-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: L Gayani Tillekeratne; Champica Bodinayake; Ajith Nagahawatte; Ruvini Kurukulasooriya; Lori A Orlando; Ryan A Simmons; Lawrence P Park; Christopher W Woods; Shelby D Reed Journal: BMJ Glob Health Date: 2019-03-30