| Literature DB >> 23522020 |
Congfen Li1, Chikara Takahashi, Liangxuan Zhang, Mahrukh Huseni, Basha Stankovich, Haider Mashhedi, Joanna Lee, Dorothy French, Jeff Eastham Anderson, Doris Kim, Kathy Howell, Matthew J Brauer, Marcin Kowanetz, Yibing Yan, Eric Humke, Allen Ebens, Garret Hampton, Mark R Lackner, Priti Hegde, Shidong Jia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway plays an important role in multiple myeloma (MM), a blood cancer associated with uncontrolled proliferation of bone marrow plasma cells. This study aimed to develop a robust clinical pharmacodynamic (PD) assay to measure the on-target PD effects of the selective PI3K inhibitor GDC-0941 in MM patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23522020 PMCID: PMC3623880 DOI: 10.1186/1479-5876-11-76
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
Figure 1Effects of drug wash-out on protein phosphorylation. (a). MM1s cells were treated with DMSO or GDC-0941 at indicated doses for 2 hours. Cell pellets were formalin fixed and paraffin embedded, and sectioned for pS6 staining (top). The level of pS6 was quantified by IHC and MSD assays (bottom). (b). Two MM cell lines (MM1s and RPMI8226) were treated with DMSO or GDC-0941 (200nM) overnight, washed three times and cultured in regular culture medium in the absence of GDC-0941 or DMSO. Cells were harvested at indicated times for MSD biochemical assay. The ratio of the normalized pS6/tS6 between GDC-0941 and DMSO treatments was used to calculate the percentage of pathway modulation. Data shown (a-b) are representative of at least three independent studies.
Figure 2Development of phospho flow assay. (a). PD response revealed by phospho flow analysis in MM1s cells. Note the peak shift of pS6 on the histogram in the GDC-0941-treated MM1s cells compared to DMSO. Baseline is defined based on isotype staining. (b). Cross-platform comparison between MSD and phospho flow cytometry. iMFI methodology is used to calculate the pS6 signals (c and d). Intra-assay variation studies demonstrate the absolute quantification of pS6 signals (c) and relative quantification (d), highlighting the coefficient of variation (CV). Note that MM1s cells were treated with DMSO or a PI3K pathway inhibitor (tool compound) for 2 hours in the above studies. Data shown (a-d) are representative of at least three independent studies.
Basal levels of pS6 in MM tumor and immune cells
| Tumor cells | CD45-; CD38+; CD138+ | BMA | +++ | Robust |
| Monocytes | CD45+; CD14+ | PB, BMA | +++ | Moderate |
| B cells | CD45+; CD20+ | PB, BMA | - | N/A |
| T cells | CD45+; CD3+ | PB, BMA | - | N/A |
Figure 3Development of tumor PD and surrogate PD biomarkers using phospho flow assay. (a). Gating strategy of tumor and surrogate tissues in pS6 phospho flow study using BMA and PB obtained from myeloma patients. Representative scheme is shown for myeloma tumor cells (CD45-; CD38+; CD138+) in BMA and monocytes (CD45+; CD14+) in PB and BMA. FACS, i.e., fluorescence-activated cell sorting, is a specialized type of flow cytometry. (b and c). GDC-0941 dose-dependent PD response. Patient-derived BMA and PB were treated with GDC-0941 at indicated doses ex vivo for 2 hours. Phospho flow analysis demonstrated the GDC-0941 dose-dependent tumor PD response in histogram (b) and % of pS6 baseline signals in tumor cells and monocytes (c). Data shown are representative of at least three independent studies.
Figure 4Development of one-shot sample handling protocol. (a). Ambient storage conditions impair the pS6 status over time. Y-axis refers to % of pS6 baseline signals. (b). The one-shot sample handling protocol provided well-preserved pS6 signals for 24 hrs. (c). An overview of the phospho flow-based PD study proposed for clinical trials. Data shown (a-b) are representative of at least three independent studies.