Literature DB >> 15047199

Analysis of protein phosphorylation and cellular signaling events by flow cytometry: techniques and clinical applications.

Peter O Krutzik1, Jonathan M Irish, Garry P Nolan, Omar D Perez.   

Abstract

Analysis of protein phosphorylation with flow cytometric techniques has emerged as a powerful tool in the field of immunological signaling, allowing cellular subsets in complex populations to be analyzed accurately and rapidly. In this review, we examine the development of phospho-epitope, or phospho-specific, flow cytometry and the premises upon which the technique is based. Phospho-specific flow cytometry is compared to traditional biochemical methods, and its advantages, such as single cell analysis, multiparameter data acquisition, rapid protocols, and the ability to analyze rare cell subsets, are detailed. We also discuss the many technical considerations that must be addressed when developing new antibodies or analyzing new epitopes including antigen accessibility, stability of the phospho-epitope, fluorophore selection, surface phenotype integrity, and antibody suitability for staining epitopes inside fixed and permeabilized cells. The methods that have been used to date are described in light of these technical considerations. The importance of developing bioinformatic platforms in parallel with these techniques is emphasized due to the large, multiparameter datasets that are rapidly accumulated and which require more efficient data viewing and complex clustering methods than currently available for flow cytometric data. Finally, we discuss the potential clinical applications of phospho-specific flow cytometry in analyzing immune cell development and antigen-specific immune responses, as well as pharmacodynamic profiling of disease states or drug efficacy and specificity against particular signaling proteins.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15047199     DOI: 10.1016/j.clim.2003.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Immunol        ISSN: 1521-6616            Impact factor:   3.969


  107 in total

1.  In vivo significance of ITK-SLP-76 interaction in cytokine production.

Authors:  Juris A Grasis; David M Guimond; Nicholas R Cam; Krystal Herman; Paola Magotti; John D Lambris; Constantine D Tsoukas
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 2.  Single-cell mass cytometry for analysis of immune system functional states.

Authors:  Zach B Bjornson; Garry P Nolan; Wendy J Fantl
Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 7.486

3.  Cross-talk between Chk1 and Chk2 in double-mutant thymocytes.

Authors:  Kathrin Zaugg; Yu-Wen Su; Patrick T Reilly; Yasmin Moolani; Carol C Cheung; Razquallah Hakem; Atsushi Hirao; Qinghua Liu; Stephen J Elledge; Tak W Mak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Learning signaling network structures with sparsely distributed data.

Authors:  Karen Sachs; Solomon Itani; Jennifer Carlisle; Garry P Nolan; Dana Pe'er; Douglas A Lauffenburger
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.479

5.  High content cell screening in a microfluidic device.

Authors:  Raymond Cheong; Chiaochun Joanne Wang; Andre Levchenko
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 6.  Imaging flow cytometry: coping with heterogeneity in biological systems.

Authors:  Natasha S Barteneva; Elizaveta Fasler-Kan; Ivan A Vorobjev
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 2.479

Review 7.  Flow Cytometry, a Versatile Tool for Diagnosis and Monitoring of Primary Immunodeficiencies.

Authors:  Roshini S Abraham; Geraldine Aubert
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2016-04-04

8.  Genomic and proteomic analysis reveals a threshold level of MYC required for tumor maintenance.

Authors:  Catherine M Shachaf; Andrew J Gentles; Sailaja Elchuri; Debashis Sahoo; Yoav Soen; Orr Sharpe; Omar D Perez; Maria Chang; Dennis Mitchel; William H Robinson; David Dill; Garry P Nolan; Sylvia K Plevritis; Dean W Felsher
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 9.  Non-genetic heterogeneity of cells in development: more than just noise.

Authors:  Sui Huang
Journal:  Development       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  Human cell chips: adapting DNA microarray spotting technology to cell-based imaging assays.

Authors:  Traver Hart; Alice Zhao; Ankit Garg; Swetha Bolusani; Edward M Marcotte
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.