OBJECTIVES: Controversy surrounds the diagnostic categorization of children with episodic moods that cause impairment, but do not meet DSM-IV criteria for bipolar I (BD-I) or bipolar II (BD-II) disorder. This study aimed to characterize the degree to which these children, who meet criteria for bipolar disorder not otherwise specified (BD-NOS), are similar to those with full syndromal BD, versus those with no bipolar spectrum diagnosis (no BSD). METHODS: Children aged 6-12 years were recruited from nine outpatient clinics, preferentially selected for higher scores on a 10-item screen for manic symptoms. Interviews with the children and their primary caregivers assessed a wide array of clinical variables, as well as family history. RESULTS: A total of 707 children [mean ± standard deviation (SD) 9.4 ± 1.9 years old] were evaluated at baseline, and were diagnosed with BD-I (n = 71), BD-II (n = 3), BD-NOS (including cyclothymia; n = 88), or no BSD (n = 545). Compared to BD-I, the BD-NOS group had less severe past functional impairment. However, current symptom severity and functional impairment did not differ between BD-NOS and BD-I, even though both groups were significantly more symptomatic and impaired than the no BSD group. Parental psychiatric history was similar for the BD-NOS and BD-I groups, and both were more likely than the no BSD group to have a parent with a history of mania. Rates of elated mood did not differ between BD-NOS and BD-I youth. CONCLUSIONS: Children with BD-NOS and BD-I are quite similar, but different from the no BSD group, on many phenomenological measures. These findings support the hypothesis that BD-NOS is on the same spectrum as BD-I.
OBJECTIVES: Controversy surrounds the diagnostic categorization of children with episodic moods that cause impairment, but do not meet DSM-IV criteria for bipolar I (BD-I) or bipolar II (BD-II) disorder. This study aimed to characterize the degree to which these children, who meet criteria for bipolar disorder not otherwise specified (BD-NOS), are similar to those with full syndromal BD, versus those with no bipolar spectrum diagnosis (no BSD). METHODS:Children aged 6-12 years were recruited from nine outpatient clinics, preferentially selected for higher scores on a 10-item screen for manic symptoms. Interviews with the children and their primary caregivers assessed a wide array of clinical variables, as well as family history. RESULTS: A total of 707 children [mean ± standard deviation (SD) 9.4 ± 1.9 years old] were evaluated at baseline, and were diagnosed with BD-I (n = 71), BD-II (n = 3), BD-NOS (including cyclothymia; n = 88), or no BSD (n = 545). Compared to BD-I, the BD-NOS group had less severe past functional impairment. However, current symptom severity and functional impairment did not differ between BD-NOS and BD-I, even though both groups were significantly more symptomatic and impaired than the no BSD group. Parental psychiatric history was similar for the BD-NOS and BD-I groups, and both were more likely than the no BSD group to have a parent with a history of mania. Rates of elated mood did not differ between BD-NOS and BD-I youth. CONCLUSIONS:Children with BD-NOS and BD-I are quite similar, but different from the no BSD group, on many phenomenological measures. These findings support the hypothesis that BD-NOS is on the same spectrum as BD-I.
Authors: J Kaufman; B Birmaher; D Brent; U Rao; C Flynn; P Moreci; D Williamson; N Ryan Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 1997-07 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: B Geller; B Zimerman; M Williams; K Bolhofner; J L Craney; M P DelBello; C Soutullo Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Danella M Hafeman; Genna Bebko; Michele A Bertocci; Jay C Fournier; Lisa Bonar; Susan B Perlman; Michael Travis; Mary Kay Gill; Vaibhav A Diwadkar; Jeffrey L Sunshine; Scott K Holland; Robert A Kowatch; Boris Birmaher; David Axelson; Sarah M Horwitz; L Eugene Arnold; Mary A Fristad; Thomas W Frazier; Eric A Youngstrom; Robert L Findling; Wayne Drevets; Mary L Phillips Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2014-08-08 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Marc J Weintraub; Christopher D Schneck; Patricia D Walshaw; Kiki D Chang; Manpreet K Singh; David A Axelson; Boris Birmaher; David J Miklowitz Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2020-01-25 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Danella M Hafeman; John Merranko; David Axelson; Benjamin I Goldstein; Tina Goldstein; Kelly Monk; Mary Beth Hickey; Dara Sakolsky; Rasim Diler; Satish Iyengar; David Brent; David Kupfer; Boris Birmaher Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2016-02-19 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Mary A Fristad; Andrea S Young; Anthony T Vesco; Elias S Nader; K Zachary Healy; William Gardner; Hannah L Wolfson; L Eugene Arnold Journal: J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 2.576
Authors: Danella Hafeman; Genna Bebko; Michele A Bertocci; Jay C Fournier; Henry W Chase; Lisa Bonar; Susan B Perlman; Michael Travis; Mary Kay Gill; Vaibhav A Diwadkar; Jeffrey L Sunshine; Scott K Holland; Robert A Kowatch; Boris Birmaher; David Axelson; Sarah M Horwitz; L Eugene Arnold; Mary A Fristad; Thomas W Frazier; Eric A Youngstrom; Robert L Findling; Mary L Phillips Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2016-10-11 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Carrie A H Vaudreuil; Stephen V Faraone; Maura Di Salvo; Janet R Wozniak; Rebecca A Wolenski; Nicholas W Carrellas; Joseph Biederman Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2018-12-19 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Marc J Weintraub; Christopher D Schneck; Patricia D Walshaw; Kiki D Chang; Aimee E Sullivan; Manpreet K Singh; David J Miklowitz Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2020-08-13 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Snežana Urošević; Eric A Youngstrom; Paul Collins; Jonathan B Jensen; Monica Luciana Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2015-11-06 Impact factor: 4.839