M M Weissman1, P Wickramaratne, P Adams, S Wolk, H Verdeli, M Olfson. 1. Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York 10032, USA. weissman@child.cpmc.columbia.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Brief screens to collect lifetime family psychiatric history are useful in clinical practice and for identifying potential families for genetic studies. METHODS: The Family History Screen (FHS) collects information on 15 psychiatric disorders and suicidal behavior in informants and their first-degree relatives. Since each question is posed only once about all family members as a group, the administrative time is 5 to 20 minutes, depending on family size and illness. Data on the validity against best-estimate (BE) diagnosis based on independent and blind direct interviews on 289 probands and 305 relatives and test-retest reliability across 15 months in 417 subjects are presented. RESULTS: Agreement between FHS and BE diagnosis for proband and relative self-report had median sensitivity (SEN) of 67.6 and 71.1 respectively; median specificity (SPC) was 87.6 and 89.4, respectively. Marked decrease in SEN occurred when a single informant (the proband) reported on a relative (median, 37.5); however, median SPC was 95.8. Use of more than 1 informant substantially improved SEN (median, 68.2), with a modest reduction in SPC (median, 86.8). Test-retest reliability across 15 months resulted in a median kappa of 0.56. CONCLUSIONS: The FHS is a promising brief screen for collecting lifetime psychiatric history on an informant and/or first-degree relatives. Its validity is best demonstrated for major depression, anxiety disorders, substance dependence (alcohol and drug dependence), and suicide attempts. It is not a substitute for more lengthy family history if more detail on diagnosis is required.
BACKGROUND: Brief screens to collect lifetime family psychiatric history are useful in clinical practice and for identifying potential families for genetic studies. METHODS: The Family History Screen (FHS) collects information on 15 psychiatric disorders and suicidal behavior in informants and their first-degree relatives. Since each question is posed only once about all family members as a group, the administrative time is 5 to 20 minutes, depending on family size and illness. Data on the validity against best-estimate (BE) diagnosis based on independent and blind direct interviews on 289 probands and 305 relatives and test-retest reliability across 15 months in 417 subjects are presented. RESULTS: Agreement between FHS and BE diagnosis for proband and relative self-report had median sensitivity (SEN) of 67.6 and 71.1 respectively; median specificity (SPC) was 87.6 and 89.4, respectively. Marked decrease in SEN occurred when a single informant (the proband) reported on a relative (median, 37.5); however, median SPC was 95.8. Use of more than 1 informant substantially improved SEN (median, 68.2), with a modest reduction in SPC (median, 86.8). Test-retest reliability across 15 months resulted in a median kappa of 0.56. CONCLUSIONS: The FHS is a promising brief screen for collecting lifetime psychiatric history on an informant and/or first-degree relatives. Its validity is best demonstrated for major depression, anxiety disorders, substance dependence (alcohol and drug dependence), and suicide attempts. It is not a substitute for more lengthy family history if more detail on diagnosis is required.
Authors: David J Miklowitz; Christopher D Schneck; Patricia D Walshaw; Amy S Garrett; Manpreet K Singh; Catherine A Sugar; Kiki D Chang Journal: Early Interv Psychiatry Date: 2017-08-04 Impact factor: 2.732
Authors: Sarah Horwitz; Christine Demeter; Margaret Hayden; Amy Storfer-Isser; Thomas W Frazier; Mary A Fristad; L Eugene Arnold; Eric A Youngstrom; Boris Birmaher; David Axelson; Robert L Findling Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Danella M Hafeman; Genna Bebko; Michele A Bertocci; Jay C Fournier; Lisa Bonar; Susan B Perlman; Michael Travis; Mary Kay Gill; Vaibhav A Diwadkar; Jeffrey L Sunshine; Scott K Holland; Robert A Kowatch; Boris Birmaher; David Axelson; Sarah M Horwitz; L Eugene Arnold; Mary A Fristad; Thomas W Frazier; Eric A Youngstrom; Robert L Findling; Wayne Drevets; Mary L Phillips Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2014-08-08 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Flávia Wagner; Michelle M Martel; Hugo Cogo-Moreira; Carlos Renato Moreira Maia; Pedro Mario Pan; Luis Augusto Rohde; Giovanni Abrahão Salum Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2015-04-17 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Boris Birmaher; John A Merranko; Tina R Goldstein; Mary Kay Gill; Benjamin I Goldstein; Heather Hower; Shirley Yen; Danella Hafeman; Michael Strober; Rasim S Diler; David Axelson; Neal D Ryan; Martin B Keller Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2018-08-07 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Marc J Weintraub; Christopher D Schneck; Patricia D Walshaw; Kiki D Chang; Aimee E Sullivan; Manpreet K Singh; David J Miklowitz Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2020-08-13 Impact factor: 4.839