Snežana Urošević1, Eric A Youngstrom2, Paul Collins3, Jonathan B Jensen4, Monica Luciana3. 1. Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, USA. Electronic address: snezana.urosevic@gmail.com. 2. Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA. 3. Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, USA. 4. Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Bipolar disorders' (BD) onset before age 18 is a potential marker for a more severe illness course. Adolescence is also a period of significant normative maturation of inhibitory control and reward-relevant decision-making processes, such as decreased delay discounting (i.e., decreased preference for smaller, immediate versus larger, delayed rewards). Adults with BD exhibit elevated delay discounting rates. Very little is known about developmental changes in delay discounting in adolescents with BD, or about associations between inhibitory control and delay discounting in BD. The present study addresses these questions. METHODS: The sample included 78 participants, ages 13 to 23, with BD or without history of mental illness. Group differences and group by age interaction effects on delay discounting (32 BD, 32 controls with valid responses), probability discounting (34 BD, 37 controls) and inhibitory control indices (34 BD, 38 controls) were assessed. RESULTS: Among healthy controls, less discounting of delayed rewards was associated with older age, whereas adolescents with BD did not show age-related associations. There were no group differences in probability discounting or inhibitory control. LIMITATIONS: The cross-sectional nature of the study cannot fully rule out the less likely interpretation of group differences in cohort effects. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of age-related improvement in delay tolerance in BD suggests disrupted development of executive control processes within reward contexts, which in turn may contribute to understanding more severe course of pediatric onset BD. Longitudinal studies are needed to examine delay discounting in relation to maturation of neural reward systems among adolescents with BD.
OBJECTIVES:Bipolar disorders' (BD) onset before age 18 is a potential marker for a more severe illness course. Adolescence is also a period of significant normative maturation of inhibitory control and reward-relevant decision-making processes, such as decreased delay discounting (i.e., decreased preference for smaller, immediate versus larger, delayed rewards). Adults with BD exhibit elevated delay discounting rates. Very little is known about developmental changes in delay discounting in adolescents with BD, or about associations between inhibitory control and delay discounting in BD. The present study addresses these questions. METHODS: The sample included 78 participants, ages 13 to 23, with BD or without history of mental illness. Group differences and group by age interaction effects on delay discounting (32 BD, 32 controls with valid responses), probability discounting (34 BD, 37 controls) and inhibitory control indices (34 BD, 38 controls) were assessed. RESULTS: Among healthy controls, less discounting of delayed rewards was associated with older age, whereas adolescents with BD did not show age-related associations. There were no group differences in probability discounting or inhibitory control. LIMITATIONS: The cross-sectional nature of the study cannot fully rule out the less likely interpretation of group differences in cohort effects. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of age-related improvement in delay tolerance in BD suggests disrupted development of executive control processes within reward contexts, which in turn may contribute to understanding more severe course of pediatric onset BD. Longitudinal studies are needed to examine delay discounting in relation to maturation of neural reward systems among adolescents with BD.
Authors: F C Murphy; J S Rubinsztein; A Michael; R D Rogers; T W Robbins; E S Paykel; B J Sahakian Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: David A Axelson; Boris Birmaher; Michael A Strober; Benjamin I Goldstein; Wonho Ha; Mary Kay Gill; Tina R Goldstein; Shirley Yen; Heather Hower; Jeffrey I Hunt; Fangzi Liao; Satish Iyengar; Daniel Dickstein; Eunice Kim; Neal D Ryan; Erica Frankel; Martin B Keller Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2011-09-08 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Elizabeth A Olson; Paul F Collins; Catalina J Hooper; Ryan Muetzel; Kelvin O Lim; Monica Luciana Journal: J Cogn Neurosci Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Lauren B Alloy; Lyn Y Abramson; Patricia D Walshaw; Alex Cogswell; Louisa D Grandin; Megan E Hughes; Brian M Iacoviello; Wayne G Whitehouse; Snezana Urosevic; Robin Nusslock; Michael E Hogan Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: D P Dickstein; E C Finger; M A Brotman; B A Rich; D S Pine; J R Blair; E Leibenluft Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2009-10-12 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Michael Amlung; Emma Marsden; Katherine Holshausen; Vanessa Morris; Herry Patel; Lana Vedelago; Katherine R Naish; Derek D Reed; Randi E McCabe Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Max M Owens; Joshua C Gray; Michael T Amlung; Assaf Oshri; Lawrence H Sweet; James MacKillop Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2017-08-31 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Huan Wang; Tyler A Lesh; Richard J Maddock; Catherine Fassbender; Cameron S Carter Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2020-01-03 Impact factor: 4.939