Literature DB >> 23520226

Effects of the frame acquisition rate on the sensitivity of gastro-oesophageal reflux scintigraphy.

I Codreanu1, W Chamroonrat, K Edwards, H Zhuang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the sensitivity of gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR) scintigraphy at 5-s and 60-s frame acquisition rates.
METHODS: GOR scintigraphy of 50 subjects (1 month-20 years old, mean 42 months) were analysed concurrently using 5-s and 60-s acquisition frames. Reflux episodes were graded as low if activity was detected in the distal half of the oesophagus and high if activity was detected in its upper half or in the oral cavity. For comparison purposes, detected GOR in any number of 5-s frames corresponding to one 60-s frame was counted as one episode.
RESULTS: A total of 679 episodes of GOR to the upper oesophagus were counted using a 5-s acquisition technique. Only 183 of such episodes were detected on 60-s acquisition images. To the lower oesophagus, a total of 1749 GOR episodes were detected using a 5-s acquisition technique and only 1045 episodes using 60-s acquisition frames (these also included the high-level GOR on 5-s frames counted as low level on 60-s acquisition frames). 10 patients had high-level GOR episodes that were detected only using a 5-s acquisition technique, leading to a different diagnosis in these patients. No correlation between the number of reflux episodes and the gastric emptying rates was noted.
CONCLUSION: The 5-s frame acquisition technique is more sensitive than the 60-s frame acquisition technique for detecting both high- and low-level GOR. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Brief GOR episodes with a relatively low number of radioactive counts are frequently indistinguishable from intense background activity on 60-s acquisition frames.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23520226      PMCID: PMC3664983          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20130084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  15 in total

1.  Temporal relationship between gastroesophageal reflux and rate of gastric emptying in children.

Authors:  Sait Sager; Metin Halac; Nalan Selcuk; Ismail Dogan; Levent Kabasakal; Cetin Onsel; Ilhami Uslu
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.690

2.  Gastric emptying in patients with severe reflux esophagitis.

Authors:  A Keshavarzian; D L Bushnell; S Sontag; E J Yegelwel; K Smid
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH esophageal testing compared to pH alone for diagnosing both acid and weakly acidic gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  Amine Hila; Amit Agrawal; Donald O Castell
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 4.  Non-acid gastroesophageal reflux: documenting its relationship to symptoms using multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII).

Authors:  Donald O Castell; Inder Mainie; Radu Tutuian
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  2005

5.  Normal values of 24-hour combined esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring in the Chinese population.

Authors:  Ying L Xiao; Jin K Lin; Ting K Cheung; Nina Y H Wong; Li Yang; Ivan F N Hung; Benjamin C Y Wong; Min H Chen
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 3.216

6.  The utility of intraluminal impedance in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease-like symptoms but normal endoscopy and 24-hour pH testing.

Authors:  Michael M Kline; Mark Ewing; Nicole Simpson; Loren Laine
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 7.  Review article: complete gastro-oesophageal reflux monitoring - combined pH and impedance.

Authors:  R Tutuian; D O Castell
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 8.171

Review 8.  Gastroesophageal reflux and gastric emptying, revisited.

Authors:  Sara Emerenziani; Daniel Sifrim
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2005-06

9.  [Usefulness of multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH metry in children with suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease].

Authors:  Shin Hye Lee; Joo Young Jang; In Ja Yoon; Kyung Mo Kim
Journal:  Korean J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-07

10.  Scintigraphy versus pH probe for quantification of pediatric gastroesophageal reflux: a study using concurrent multiplexed data and acid feedings.

Authors:  S R Orenstein; H A Klein; M S Rosenthal
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring and reflux scintigraphy in pediatric patients with suspected gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  Nuray Uslu Kızılkan; Murat Fani Bozkurt; Inci Nur Saltık Temizel; Hülya Demir; Aysel Yüce; Biray Caner; Hasan Özen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.