Literature DB >> 17296528

Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH esophageal testing compared to pH alone for diagnosing both acid and weakly acidic gastroesophageal reflux.

Amine Hila1, Amit Agrawal, Donald O Castell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Twenty-four-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH (MII-pH) esophageal monitoring detects reflux episodes at all pH levels, including acid reflux and weakly acidic reflux (WAR). The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of pH monitoring alone in detecting acid reflux and WAR compared with MII-pH.
METHODS: For the detection of acid reflux: 60 consecutive MII-pH studies of patients off acid suppression were included. All studies initially were read by exclusively analyzing pH tracing for acid reflux episodes. Subsequently, all studies were blindly read again analyzing MII-pH-detected acid reflux episodes (pH decrease of <4 and MII-detected reflux). For the detection of weakly acidic reflux 40 MII-pH studies were included. Each study initially was read by identifying WAR on the pH tracing. Subsequently, studies were re-analyzed using MII tracings, classifying MII-detected reflux episodes into acid, WAR, or nonacid reflux.
RESULTS: For the detection of acid reflux the pH alone compared with MII-pH yielded a specificity of 68%, 67%, and 58%, respectively, for either abnormal percentage time of pH less than 4, positive symptom index, or both. The percentage time that the pH was less than 4 was significantly higher using pH alone compared with MII-pH. Eighty-one percent of acid gastroesophageal reflux episodes exclusively detected by pH were associated with MII-detected swallow. For the detection of WAR compared with MII, pH alone had a sensitivity of only 28%. Eighty-three percent of WAR episodes detected by pH were not associated with MII-detected reflux.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of pH alone for the detection of acid reflux is very sensitive but lacks specificity compared with MII-pH. pH alone may overdiagnose abnormal acid reflux in up to 22% of tested patients. Also, the use of pH for the detection of WAR has poor sensitivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17296528     DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.11.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  25 in total

Review 1.  New esophageal function testing (impedance, Bravo pH monitoring, and high-resolution manometry): clinical relevance.

Authors:  Jason A Wilson; Marcelo F Vela
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2008-06

2.  Reply to "the importance of subgrouping refractory NERD patients according to esophageal pH-impedance testing".

Authors:  Marzio Frazzoni; Micaela Piccoli; Rita Conigliaro; Raffaele Manta; Leonardo Frazzoni; Gianluigi Melotti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH testing is clinically useful in the management of patients with gastroesophageal reflux symptoms.

Authors:  Daniela Jodorkovsky; Jennifer C Price; Brian Kim; Sameer Dhalla; Ellen M Stein; John O Clarke
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Comparison of laparoscopic Nissen and Toupet fundoplication using a propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Masato Hoshino; Nobuo Omura; Fumiaki Yano; Kazuto Tsuboi; Se Ryung Yamamoto; Shunsuke Akimoto; Norio Mitsumori; Hideyuki Kashiwagi; Katsuhiko Yanaga
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Effects of the frame acquisition rate on the sensitivity of gastro-oesophageal reflux scintigraphy.

Authors:  I Codreanu; W Chamroonrat; K Edwards; H Zhuang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Esophageal Impedance Monitoring: Clinical Pearls and Pitfalls.

Authors:  Karthik Ravi; David A Katzka
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Reflux parameters as modified by laparoscopic fundoplication in 40 patients with heartburn/regurgitation persisting despite PPI therapy: a study using impedance-pH monitoring.

Authors:  Marzio Frazzoni; Rita Conigliaro; Gianluigi Melotti
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Bile in the esophagus-model for a bile acid biosensor.

Authors:  Dhiren Nehra
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Esophageal motility in nonacid reflux compared with acid reflux.

Authors:  Victor S Wang; Natan Feldman; Rie Maurer; Robert Burakoff
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Combined Dual Channel Impedance/pH-metry in Patients With Suspected Laryngopharyngeal Reflux.

Authors:  Bong Eun Lee; Gwang Ha Kim; Dong Yup Ryu; Dong Uk Kim; Jae Hoon Cheong; Dong Gun Lee; Geun Am Song
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 4.924

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.