Literature DB >> 23519553

Blue gum gaming machine: an evaluation of responsible gambling features.

Alexander Blaszczynski1, Sally Gainsbury, Lisa Karlov.   

Abstract

Structural characteristics of gaming machines contribute to persistence in play and excessive losses. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of five proposed responsible gaming features: responsible gaming messages; a bank meter quarantining winnings until termination of play; alarm clock facilitating setting time-reminders; demo mode allowing play without money; and a charity donation feature where residual amounts can be donated rather than played to zero credits. A series of ten modified gaming machines were located in five Australian gambling venues. The sample comprised 300 patrons attending the venue and who played the gaming machines. Participants completed a structured interview eliciting gambling and socio-demographic data and information on their perceptions and experience of play on the index machines. Results showed that one-quarter of participants considered that these features would contribute to preventing recreational gamblers from developing problems. Just under half of the participants rated these effects to be at least moderate or significant. The promising results suggest that further refinements to several of these features could represent a modest but effective approach to minimising excessive gambling on gaming machines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23519553     DOI: 10.1007/s10899-013-9378-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gambl Stud        ISSN: 1050-5350


  16 in total

1.  Epidemiology of problem gambling in Prince Edward Island: a Canadian microcosm?

Authors:  J P Doiron; R M Nicki
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.356

2.  An Empirical Examinination of Jacobs' General Theory of Addictions: Do Adolescent Gamblers Fit the Theory?

Authors:  Rina Gupta; Jeffrey L. Derevensky
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  1998

3.  Exploring college student gambling motivation.

Authors:  Clayton Neighbors; Ty W Lostutter; Jessica M Cronce; Mary E Larimer
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2002

Review 4.  Electronic gaming machines: are they the 'crack-cocaine' of gambling?

Authors:  Nicki Dowling; David Smith; Trang Thomas
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.526

5.  The five-factor gambling motivation model.

Authors:  Heung-Pyo Lee; Paul Kyuman Chae; Hong-Seock Lee; Yong-Ku Kim
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 3.222

6.  Using a computer simulation of three slot machines to investigate a gambler's preference among varying densities of near-miss alternatives.

Authors:  Otrro H MacLin; Mark R Dixon; Dustin Daugherty; Stacey L Small
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-05

7.  Strength of commitment language in motivational interviewing and gambling outcomes.

Authors:  David C Hodgins; Laurie E Ching; Jamie McEwen
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2009-03

8.  Experimental analysis of the game in pathological gamblers: effect of the immediacy of the reward in slot machines.

Authors:  Mariano Chóliz
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2010-06

9.  Impact of mode of display and message content of responsible gambling signs for electronic gaming machines on regular gamblers.

Authors:  Sally Monaghan; Alex Blaszczynski
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2010-03

Review 10.  Prevalence of adult problem and pathological gambling between 2000 and 2005: an update.

Authors:  Stephanie Stucki; Margret Rihs-Middel
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2007-01-11
View more
  10 in total

1.  Jackpot Structural Features: Rollover Effect and Goal-Gradient Effect in EGM Gambling.

Authors:  En Li; Matthew J Rockloff; Matthew Browne; Phillip Donaldson
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2016-06

2.  Predictors of Gamblers Beliefs About Responsible Gambling Measures.

Authors:  Jonny Engebø; Torbjørn Torsheim; Rune Aune Mentzoni; Helge Molde; Ståle Pallesen
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2019-12

3.  Setting Win Limits: An Alternative Approach to "Responsible Gambling"?

Authors:  Douglas M Walker; Stephen W Litvin; Russell S Sobel; Renée A St-Pierre
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2015-09

4.  Satisfaction of Basic Psychological Needs and Adherence to Responsible Gambling Practices: The Mediating Role of Flourishing.

Authors:  Kwok Kit Tong; Anise M S Wu; Juliet Honglei Chen
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2022-01-08

5.  Demographic Risk Factors and Gambling Preference May Not Explain the High Prevalence of Gambling Problems Among the Population with Migration Background: Results from a German Nationwide Survey.

Authors:  Nadin Kastirke; Hans-Jürgen Rumpf; Ulrich John; Anja Bischof; Christian Meyer
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2015-09

6.  The Effects of Pop-up Harm Minimisation Messages on Electronic Gaming Machine Gambling Behaviour in New Zealand.

Authors:  Katie Palmer du Preez; Jason Landon; Maria Bellringer; Nick Garrett; Max Abbott
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2016-12

7.  The Relationship Between Structural Game Characteristics and Gambling Behavior: A Population-Level Study.

Authors:  Tony Leino; Torbjørn Torsheim; Alex Blaszczynski; Mark Griffiths; Rune Mentzoni; Ståle Pallesen; Helge Molde
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2015-12

8.  Ethical Gambling: A Necessary New Point of View of Gambling in Public Health Policies.

Authors:  Mariano Chóliz
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-01-31

9.  Measuring Responsible Gambling amongst Players: Development of the Positive Play Scale.

Authors:  Richard T A Wood; Michael J A Wohl; Nassim Tabri; Kahlil Philander
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-02-23

10.  Perspective of Internet Poker Players on Harm-Reduction Strategies: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Patrycja Michalska; Anne Chatton; Louise Penzenstadler; Paweł Izdebski; Emilien Jeannot; Olivier Simon; Magali Dufour; Lucien Rochat; Suzanne Lischer; Yasser Khazaal
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.