OBJECTIVES: The prostatitis syndrome is classified into bacterial prostatitis (acute and chronic), chronic pelvic pain syndrome and asymptomatic prostatitis. The aim of this report is to review current management standards for bacterial prostatitis. METHODS: A research was performed on literature dealing with acute and chronic bacterial prostatitis. RESULTS: There is a consensus on diagnostic management of bacterial prostatitis comprising microbiological sampling of midstream urine in acute bacterial prostatitis and performance of a bacterial localisation test in chronic bacterial prostatitis. Approximately 10 % of acute bacterial prostatitis cases eventually develop into chronic bacterial prostatitis and further 10 % into chronic pelvic pain syndrome. Bacterial isolates causing acute bacterial prostatitis are highly virulent strains comprising an array of different virulence factors. Presumably, the additional ability of isolates to form biofilms might be one factor amongst others to facilitate development of chronic bacterial prostatitis. Therapy for infectious prostatitis is standardised with antibiotics as the primary agents, empirically administered in acute prostatitis and after susceptibility testing in chronic bacterial prostatitis. Fluoroquinolones exhibit more favourable pharmacological properties; therefore, fluoroquinolones have been recommended as first-line agents in the treatment for chronic bacterial prostatitis. Antibiotic resistance to fluoroquinolones, however, is increasing and is posing significant clinical problems. Further studies on alternative antibiotics active within the prostate are therefore needed both for prophylaxis in transrectal prostate biopsy, for example, and for therapy of chronic bacterial prostatitis. CONCLUSIONS: Bacterial prostatitis has developed into well-managed entities with increasing antimicrobial resistance being the most severe drawback of yielding therapeutic success.
OBJECTIVES: The prostatitis syndrome is classified into bacterial prostatitis (acute and chronic), chronic pelvic pain syndrome and asymptomatic prostatitis. The aim of this report is to review current management standards for bacterial prostatitis. METHODS: A research was performed on literature dealing with acute and chronic bacterial prostatitis. RESULTS: There is a consensus on diagnostic management of bacterial prostatitis comprising microbiological sampling of midstream urine in acute bacterial prostatitis and performance of a bacterial localisation test in chronic bacterial prostatitis. Approximately 10 % of acute bacterial prostatitis cases eventually develop into chronic bacterial prostatitis and further 10 % into chronic pelvic pain syndrome. Bacterial isolates causing acute bacterial prostatitis are highly virulent strains comprising an array of different virulence factors. Presumably, the additional ability of isolates to form biofilms might be one factor amongst others to facilitate development of chronic bacterial prostatitis. Therapy for infectious prostatitis is standardised with antibiotics as the primary agents, empirically administered in acute prostatitis and after susceptibility testing in chronic bacterial prostatitis. Fluoroquinolones exhibit more favourable pharmacological properties; therefore, fluoroquinolones have been recommended as first-line agents in the treatment for chronic bacterial prostatitis. Antibiotic resistance to fluoroquinolones, however, is increasing and is posing significant clinical problems. Further studies on alternative antibiotics active within the prostate are therefore needed both for prophylaxis in transrectal prostate biopsy, for example, and for therapy of chronic bacterial prostatitis. CONCLUSIONS:Bacterial prostatitis has developed into well-managed entities with increasing antimicrobial resistance being the most severe drawback of yielding therapeutic success.
Authors: D Steensels; K Slabbaert; L De Wever; P Vermeersch; H Van Poppel; J Verhaegen Journal: Clin Microbiol Infect Date: 2011-09-29 Impact factor: 8.067
Authors: Aisha K Taylor; Teresa R Zembower; Robert B Nadler; Marc H Scheetz; John P Cashy; Diana Bowen; Adam B Murphy; Elodi Dielubanza; Anthony J Schaeffer Journal: J Urol Date: 2012-02-16 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Stephen F Murphy; Anthony J Schaeffer; Joseph Done; Larry Wong; Ashlee Bell-Cohn; Kenny Roman; John Cashy; Michelle Ohlhausen; Praveen Thumbikat Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-05-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jung Woo Park; Hyun Cheol Jeong; Hyong Woo Moon; Shin Jay Cho; Jong Hyup Yang; Woo Hyun Kim; Woong Jin Bae; Jin Bong Choi; Hyuk Jin Cho; U-Syn Ha; Sung Hoo Hong; Ji Youl Lee; Sae Woong Kim Journal: World J Mens Health Date: 2016-12-22 Impact factor: 5.400
Authors: Cheol In Kang; Jieun Kim; Dae Won Park; Baek Nam Kim; U Syn Ha; Seung Ju Lee; Jeong Kyun Yeo; Seung Ki Min; Heeyoung Lee; Seong Heon Wie Journal: Infect Chemother Date: 2018-03