Literature DB >> 23519295

Reinforcement of lumbosacral instrumentation using S1-pedicle screws combined with S2-alar screws.

H Koller1, J Zenner, A Hempfing, L Ferraris, O Meier.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Increasing construct stability of lumbosacral instrumentations using S2-ala screws as an alternate to iliac screws. INDICATIONS: Revision surgery after failed lumbosacral fusion; long instrumentations to the sacrum; L5-S1 fusion without anterior support. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Lack of sacral bone stock. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Midline approach. The entry point for S2-ala screws is caudal to the posterior S1 foramen and close to the lateral sacral crest. Screw tract preparation for S2-ala screws necessitates 30-45° angulation in the axial plane. Biplanar fluoroscopy with inlet and outlet views ensure screw accuracy. With S2-ala screws, bicortical fixation is the goal. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Patients are mobilized under the surveillance of physiotherapists on day 1 and released from the hospital after 10 days. Clinical and radiographic controls are performed at 6, 12 and 24 months.
RESULTS: Retrospective review of 80 patients undergoing S2-ala screw fixation. Main diagnosis was degenerative lumbar instability, adult scoliosis, high-grade listhesis, and nonidiopathic scoliosis. In 66% of patients, the instrumentation using S2-ala screws was part of a major lumbosacral revision surgery. Follow-up averaged 26 months. There were no deaths or major neurovascular complications. First time fusion rate at L5-S1 was greater than 90%. Eight patients (10%) experienced a complication which could be related to the S2-ala screws. Out of 160 S2-ala screws, 16 screws were judged to cause focal irritation and were removed, indicating a survival rate of 90% for the S2-ala screw.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23519295     DOI: 10.1007/s00064-012-0160-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol        ISSN: 0934-6694            Impact factor:   1.154


  31 in total

1.  Biomechanical comparison of lumbosacral fixation techniques in a calf spine model.

Authors:  Nathan H Lebwohl; Bryan W Cunningham; Anton Dmitriev; Norimichi Shimamoto; Lee Gooch; Vince Devlin; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Theodore A Wagner
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Determination of the length of anteromedial screw trajectory by measuring interforaminal distance in the first sacral vertebra.

Authors:  Ozerk Okutan; Erkan Kaptanoglu; Ihsan Solaroglu; Etem Beskonakli; Ibrahim Tekdemir
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Trajectory of transsacral iliac screw for lumbopelvic fixation: a 3-dimensional computed tomography study.

Authors:  Sang-Hun Lee; Wook Jin; Ki-Tack Kim; Kyung-Soo Suk; Jung-Hee Lee; Geon-Wook Seo
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2011-05

4.  Does fusion status correlate with patient outcomes in lumbar spinal fusion?

Authors:  Mladen Djurasovic; Steven D Glassman; John R Dimar; Jennifer M Howard; Kelly R Bratcher; Leah Y Carreon
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  The relationship of lumbosacral plexus to the sacrum and the sacroiliac joint.

Authors:  N A Ebraheim; J Lu; A Biyani; M Huntoon; R A Yeasting
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  1997-02

6.  Morphologic considerations of the first sacral pedicle for iliosacral screw placement.

Authors:  N A Ebraheim; R Xu; A Biyani; M C Nadaud
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Three-dimensional image-guided placement of S2 alar screws to adjunct or salvage lumbosacral fixation.

Authors:  Eric W Nottmeier; Stephen M Pirris; Sarah Balseiro; Douglas Fenton
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Adult spinal deformity surgery: complications and outcomes in patients over age 60.

Authors:  Michael D Daubs; Lawrence G Lenke; Gene Cheh; Georgia Stobbs; Keith H Bridwell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  Adult degenerative scoliosis: a review.

Authors:  John K Birknes; Andrew P White; Todd J Albert; Christopher I Shaffrey; James S Harrop
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Reoperation after primary fusion for adult spinal deformity: rate, reason, and timing.

Authors:  James M Mok; Jordan M Cloyd; David S Bradford; Serena S Hu; Vedat Deviren; Jason A Smith; Bobby Tay; Sigurd H Berven
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  [Complications of the lumbosacral junction in adult deformity surgery : Indications and technique for posterior and anterior revision surgery].

Authors:  A Tateen; J Bogert; H Koller; A Hempfing
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  Scoliosis surgery in adulthood: what challenges for what outcome?

Authors:  Yann Philippe Charles; Yves Ntilikina
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-01

3.  Factors influencing radiographic and clinical outcomes in adult scoliosis surgery: a study of 448 European patients.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Conny Pfanz; Oliver Meier; Wolfgang Hitzl; Michael Mayer; Viola Bullmann; Tobias L Schulte
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Possible factors associated with sagittal malalignment recurrence after pedicle subtraction osteotomy.

Authors:  David Eichler; Yann Philippe Charles; Florent Baldairon; Yves Ntilikina; Erik André Sauleau; Jean-Paul Steib
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Clinical evaluation of S1 alar screws application in short-segment lumbosacral fixation and fusion for spine infection with severe S1 vertebral body loss.

Authors:  Weizhi Fang; Weijun Liu; Qingbo Li; Lei Cai; Wei Wang; Xincheng Yi; Hongbo Jiao; Zhi Yao
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 2.562

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.