Literature DB >> 23512527

Psychosocial consequences of predictive genetic testing for Lynch syndrome and associations to surveillance behaviour in a 7-year follow-up study.

Katja Aktan-Collan1, Helena Kääriäinen, Heikki Järvinen, Päivi Peltomäki, Kirsi Pylvänäinen, Jukka-Pekka Mecklin, Ari Haukkala.   

Abstract

We evaluated long-term psychosocial consequences of predictive genetic testing, and surveillance behaviour in Lynch syndrome (LS). We conducted a longitudinal study of 208 participants (62 LS mutation carriers and 146 non-carriers) who provided information on general anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory), fear of cancer and dying, satisfaction with life, risk and test perceptions, and surveillance behaviour in the baseline questionnaire before testing, and 1 month, 1 year and 7 years post-test. At 7 years, most of the psychosocial variables remained unchanged, regardless of mutation status. Carriers tended to underestimate their colorectal cancer risk but were more worried about their cancer risk than their counterparts. Non-carriers reported a higher degree of satisfaction with their testing decisions (P < 0.05), but had more doubts concerning test result validity than carriers (P < 0.05). All carriers attended a post-test colonoscopy surveillance, while 16% of non-carriers reported colonoscopy examinations. Those non-carriers with doubts about test validity were more likely (P = 0.019) to report post-test colonoscopy. Of the carriers, 17% had an interval longer than 3 years between their colonoscopies. Fear of dying soon, measured at 1-month post-test follow-up was the only psychosocial variable predicting non-compliance in recommended surveillance. No adverse psychosocial consequences were detected, and respondents were satisfied with their decision to testing 7 years post-test. Among the carriers, solely fear of dying soon predicted non-compliance in recommended surveillance. Some non-carriers were still worried about their risk and had doubts about the validity of their genetic testing results predicting post-test colonoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23512527     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-013-9628-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  32 in total

1.  Predictive genetic testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: uptake and long-term satisfaction.

Authors:  K Aktan-Collan; J P Mecklin; H Järvinen; M Nyström-Lahti; P Peltomäki; I Söderling; A Uutela; A de la Chapelle; H Kääriäinen
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2000-01-20       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Predictive testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: motivation, illness representations and short-term psychological impact.

Authors:  Erna Claes; Lieve Denayer; Gerry Evers-Kiebooms; Andrea Boogaerts; Eric Legius
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2004-11

3.  Comparison of individuals opting for BRCA1/2 or HNPCC genetic susceptibility testing with regard to coping, illness perceptions, illness experiences, family system characteristics and hereditary cancer distress.

Authors:  Iris van Oostrom; Hanne Meijers-Heijboer; Hugo J Duivenvoorden; Annette H J T Bröcker-Vriends; Christi J van Asperen; Rolf H Sijmons; Caroline Seynaeve; Arthur R Van Gool; Jan G M Klijn; Aad Tibben
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2006-07-26

4.  Colonoscopy use following mutation detection in Lynch syndrome: exploring a role for cancer screening in adaptation.

Authors:  D W Hadley; S Ashida; J F Jenkins; K A Calzone; I R Kirsch; L M Koehly
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 4.438

5.  Psychological impact of genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ellen R Gritz; Susan K Peterson; Sally W Vernon; Salma K Marani; Walter F Baile; Beatty G Watts; Christopher I Amos; Marsha L Frazier; Patrick M Lynch
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-03-20       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  One to 2-year surveillance intervals reduce risk of colorectal cancer in families with Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Hans F A Vasen; Mohamed Abdirahman; Richard Brohet; Alexandra M J Langers; Jan H Kleibeuker; Mariette van Kouwen; Jan Jacob Koornstra; Henk Boot; Annemieke Cats; Evelien Dekker; Silvia Sanduleanu; Jan-Werner Poley; James C H Hardwick; Wouter H de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel; Andrea E van der Meulen-de Jong; T Gie Tan; Maarten A J M Jacobs; Faig Lall A Mohamed; Sijbrand Y de Boer; Paul C van de Meeberg; Marie-Louise Verhulst; Jan M Salemans; Nico van Bentem; B Dik Westerveld; Juda Vecht; Fokko M Nagengast
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Long-term psychological impact of carrying a BRCA1/2 mutation and prophylactic surgery: a 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Iris van Oostrom; Hanne Meijers-Heijboer; Litanja N Lodder; Hugo J Duivenvoorden; Arthur R van Gool; Caroline Seynaeve; Conny A van der Meer; Jan G M Klijn; Bert N van Geel; Curt W Burger; Juriy W Wladimiroff; Aad Tibben
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Colorectal cancer risk perception on the basis of genetic test results in individuals at risk for Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Shilpa Grover; Elena M Stoffel; Rowena C Mercado; Beth M Ford; Wendy K Kohlman; Kristen M Shannon; Peggy G Conrad; Amie M Blanco; Jonathan P Terdiman; Stephen B Gruber; Daniel C Chung; Sapna Syngal
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Monitoring coping style moderates emotional reactions to genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  S Shiloh; L Koehly; J Jenkins; J Martin; D Hadley
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.894

10.  Cancer risk in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer diagnosed by mutation analysis.

Authors:  H F Vasen; J T Wijnen; F H Menko; J H Kleibeuker; B G Taal; G Griffioen; F M Nagengast; E H Meijers-Heijboer; L Bertario; L Varesco; M L Bisgaard; J Mohr; R Fodde; P M Khan
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  15 in total

1.  Educational and Psychosocial Support Needs in Lynch Syndrome: Implementation and Assessment of an Educational Workshop and Support Group.

Authors:  Marina J Corines; Jada G Hamilton; Emily Glogowski; Chris A Anrig; Rachael Goldberg; Kate Niehaus; Erin Salo-Mullen; Megan Harlan; Margaret R Sheehan; Magan Trottier; Asad Ahsraf; Christina Tran; Lauren Jacobs; Rohini Rau-Murthy; Anne G Lincoln; Mark E Robson; Jose G Guillem; Arnold J Markowitz; Kenneth Offit; Zsofia K Stadler
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  Psychosocial Impact of Lynch Syndrome on Affected Individuals and Families.

Authors:  Polymnia Galiatsatos; Heidi Rothenmund; Sylvie Aubin; William D Foulkes
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Outcome of genetic evaluation of patients with kidney cancer referred for suspected hereditary cancer syndromes.

Authors:  Kelly L Stratton; Shaheen Alanee; Emily A Glogowski; Kasmintan A Schrader; Rohini Rau-Murthy; Robert Klein; Paul Russo; Jonathan Coleman; Kenneth Offit
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 3.498

4.  Psychological Impact of TP53-Variant-Carrier Newborns and Counselling on Mothers: A Pediatric Surveillance Cohort.

Authors:  Amanda Scartezini Gozdziejewski; Clarice Wichinescki Zotti; Isabela Aparecida Moreira de Carvalho; Thairine Camargo Dos Santos; Luana Rayana de Santi Walter; Karin Rosa Persegona Ogradowski; Karin Luiza Dammski; Heloisa Komechen; Monalisa Castilho Mendes; Emanuelle Nunes de Souza; Mariana Martins Paraizo; Ivy Zortea da Silva Parise; Guilherme Augusto Parise; André Luiz Grion; Gislaine Custódio; Rosiane Guetter Mello; Bonald C Figueiredo
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 5.  100 years Lynch syndrome: what have we learned about psychosocial issues?

Authors:  Eveline M A Bleiker; Mary Jane Esplen; Bettina Meiser; Helle Vendel Petersen; Andrea Farkas Patenaude
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Exploring psychological responses to genetic testing for Lynch Syndrome within the family context.

Authors:  Dina Eliezer; Donald W Hadley; Laura M Koehly
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Experience Gained from the Development and Execution of a Multidisciplinary Multi-syndrome Hereditary Colon Cancer Family Conference.

Authors:  Ilana Solomon; Christina Rybak; Lily Van Tongeren; Lili Kuzmich; Kathleen Blazer; Bita Nehoray; Mariana Niell-Swiller; Shawnie Bray; Travis H Bray; Karen Hurley; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Thomas P Slavin
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  Physician trust moderates the relationship between intolerance of uncertainty and cancer worry interference among women with Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Lindsey A Torbit; Jenna J Albiani; Melyssa Aronson; Spring Holter; Kara Semotiuk; Zane Cohen; Tae L Hart
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2016-01-13

9.  "I would like to discuss it further with an expert": a focus group study of Finnish adults' perspectives on genetic secondary findings.

Authors:  M Vornanen; K Aktan-Collan; N Hallowell; H Konttinen; H Kääriäinen; A Haukkala
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2018-01-16

10.  Genetic testing for Lynch syndrome: family communication and motivation.

Authors:  Celine H M Leenen; Mariska den Heijer; Conny van der Meer; Ernst J Kuipers; Monique E van Leerdam; Anja Wagner
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.