Literature DB >> 23511844

Efficiency of short individualised CPR self-learning sessions with automated assessment and feedback.

Nicolas Mpotos1, Bram De Wever, Nick Cleymans, Joris Raemaekers, Martin Valcke, Koenraad G Monsieurs.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Regular assessments are recommended to identify individuals requiring additional resuscitation training. We developed a strategy of short CPR self-learning sessions followed by automated assessment with feedback and investigated its efficiency to achieve a pre-defined level of compression skills.
METHODS: Four hundred and four students in pharmacy and educational sciences participated. Initial training (max. 40 min) consisted of a 15 min learning-while-watching video followed by manikin exercises with computer voice feedback. At baseline and after training, performance was measured using an automated test. To be judged competent participants had to achieve ≥ 70% compressions with depth ≥ 50 mm and ≥ 70% compressions with complete release (<5mm) and a compression rate between 100 and 120 min(-1) within a two month period. Automated feedback was provided and failed participants had to retrain within two weeks. Retraining (max. 20 min and max. three times) was done with voice feedback exercises. Before retraining, the previous test result was displayed together with feedforward. After five months all participants were invited for a retention test.
RESULTS: After one to four sessions, 99% (401/404) of all participants achieved competency. After five months 48% (137/288) of the students participating in the retention test was still competent. The percentage competent participants was 80% (230/288) for compression depth, 97% (279/288) for complete release and 60% (172/288) for mean rate.
CONCLUSIONS: One or multiple short self-learning sessions were highly efficient to successfully train 99% of participants. After five months, retention of compression depth and complete release was very high. However, only 48% still achieved a 70% combined score for compression skills, highlighting the importance of regular assessment and retraining.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assessment; Basic life support; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Feedback; Retention; Self-learning

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23511844     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.02.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  7 in total

1.  Quality of Basic Life Support - A Comparison between Medical Students and Paramedics.

Authors:  Maria Isabel Körber; Thomas Köhler; Verena Weiss; Roman Pfister; Guido Michels
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-07-01

2.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of workplace-based distributed cardiopulmonary resuscitation training versus conventional annual basic life support training.

Authors:  Yiqun Lin; Kent Hecker; Adam Cheng; Vincent J Grant; Gillian Currie
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2020-09-29

3.  Cardiopulmonary resuscitation retention training for hospital nurses by a self-learner skill station or the traditional instructor led course: A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Kristoffer Sand; Anna Ulstein Guldal; Tor Åge Myklebust; Dag Arne Lihaug Hoff; Per Christian Juvkam; Torstein Hole
Journal:  Resusc Plus       Date:  2021-08-19

Review 4.  Feedback for Learning in Pharmacy Education: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Nicholas R Nelson; Rebecca B Carlson; Amanda H Corbett; Dennis M Williams; Denise H Rhoney
Journal:  Pharmacy (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-23

5.  Inhospital cardiac arrest - the crucial first 5 min: a simulation study.

Authors:  Mathilde Stærk; Kasper G Lauridsen; Camilla Thomsen Støtt; Dung Nguyen Riis; Bo Løfgren; Kristian Krogh
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2022-09-09

6.  Effectiveness of a One-minute Self-retraining for Chest Compression-only Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Chika Nishiyama; Tomonari Shimamoto; Kosuke Kiyohara; Takashi Kawamura; Tetsuhisa Kitamura; Tetsuya Sakamoto; Taku Iwami
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2017-05-12

7.  Effectiveness of a 40-minute Ophthalmologic Examination Teaching Session on Medical Student Learning.

Authors:  Wirachin Hoonpongsimanont; Kambria Nguyen; Wu Deng; Dena Nasir; Bharath Chakravarthy; Shahram Lotfipour
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2015-10-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.