Maria Isabel Körber1, Thomas Köhler1, Verena Weiss2, Roman Pfister1, Guido Michels1. 1. Department III of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne , Heart Center, Germany . 2. Institute of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Epidemiology, University of Cologne , Cologne, Germany .
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Poor survival rates after cardiac arrest can partly be explained by poor basic life support skills in medical professionals. AIM: This study aimed to assess quality of basic life support in medical students and paramedics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study with 100 early medical students (group A), 100 late medical students (group B) and 100 paramedics (group C), performing a 20-minute basic life support simulation in teams of two. Average frequency and absolute number of chest compressions per minute (mean (±SD)), chest decompression (millimetres of compression remaining, mean (±SD)), hands-off-time (seconds/minute, mean (±SD)), frequency of switching positions between ventilation and chest compression (per 20 minutes) and rate of sufficient compressions (depth ≥50mm) were assessed as quality parameters of CPR. RESULTS: In groups A, B and C the rates of sufficiently deep chest compressions were 56%, 42% and 52%, respectively, without significant differences. Male gender and real-life CPR experience were significantly associated with deeper chest compression. Frequency and number of chest compressions were within recommended goals in at least 96% of all groups. Remaining chest compressions were 6 mm (±2), 6 mm (±2) and 5 mm (±2) with a significant difference between group A and C (p=0.017). Hands-off times were 6s/min (±1), 5s/min (±1) and 4s/min (±1), which was significantly different across all three groups. CONCLUSION: Overall, paramedics tended to show better quality of CPR compared to medical students. Though, chest compression depth as an important quality characteristic of CPR was insufficient in almost 50% of participants, even in well trained paramedics. Therefore, we suggest that an effort should be made to find better ways to educate health care professionals in BLS.
INTRODUCTION: Poor survival rates after cardiac arrest can partly be explained by poor basic life support skills in medical professionals. AIM: This study aimed to assess quality of basic life support in medical students and paramedics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study with 100 early medical students (group A), 100 late medical students (group B) and 100 paramedics (group C), performing a 20-minute basic life support simulation in teams of two. Average frequency and absolute number of chest compressions per minute (mean (±SD)), chest decompression (millimetres of compression remaining, mean (±SD)), hands-off-time (seconds/minute, mean (±SD)), frequency of switching positions between ventilation and chest compression (per 20 minutes) and rate of sufficient compressions (depth ≥50mm) were assessed as quality parameters of CPR. RESULTS: In groups A, B and C the rates of sufficiently deep chest compressions were 56%, 42% and 52%, respectively, without significant differences. Male gender and real-life CPR experience were significantly associated with deeper chest compression. Frequency and number of chest compressions were within recommended goals in at least 96% of all groups. Remaining chest compressions were 6 mm (±2), 6 mm (±2) and 5 mm (±2) with a significant difference between group A and C (p=0.017). Hands-off times were 6s/min (±1), 5s/min (±1) and 4s/min (±1), which was significantly different across all three groups. CONCLUSION: Overall, paramedics tended to show better quality of CPR compared to medical students. Though, chest compression depth as an important quality characteristic of CPR was insufficient in almost 50% of participants, even in well trained paramedics. Therefore, we suggest that an effort should be made to find better ways to educate health care professionals in BLS.
Entities:
Keywords:
Education; Emergency medicine; Resuscitation; Resuscitation training
Authors: Malcolm Woollard; Richard Whitfield; Robert G Newcombe; Michael Colquhoun; Norman Vetter; Douglas Chamberlain Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2006-09-28 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Ian G Stiell; Siobhan P Brown; Graham Nichol; Sheldon Cheskes; Christian Vaillancourt; Clifton W Callaway; Laurie J Morrison; James Christenson; Tom P Aufderheide; Daniel P Davis; Cliff Free; Dave Hostler; John A Stouffer; Ahamed H Idris Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-09-24 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Ian G Stiell; Siobhan P Brown; James Christenson; Sheldon Cheskes; Graham Nichol; Judy Powell; Blair Bigham; Laurie J Morrison; Jonathan Larsen; Erik Hess; Christian Vaillancourt; Daniel P Davis; Clifton W Callaway Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Bentley J Bobrow; Lani L Clark; Gordon A Ewy; Vatsal Chikani; Arthur B Sanders; Robert A Berg; Peter B Richman; Karl B Kern Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-03-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Ramón Fungueiriño-Suárez; Roberto Barcala-Furelos; Marta González-Fermoso; Santiago Martínez-Isasi; Felipe Fernández-Méndez; Violeta González-Salvado; Rubén Navarro-Patón; Antonio Rodríguez-Núñez Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2018-04-24 Impact factor: 3.411