| Literature DB >> 23510136 |
Luke A Hoekstra1, Kristi L Montooth.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mutations that increase gene expression are predicted to increase energy allocation to transcription, translation and protein function. Despite an appreciation that energetic tradeoffs may constrain adaptation, the energetic costs of increased gene expression are challenging to quantify and thus easily ignored when modeling the evolution of gene expression, particularly for multicellular organisms. Here we use the well-characterized, inducible heat-shock response to test whether expressing additional copies of the Hsp70 gene increases energetic demand in Drosophila melanogaster.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23510136 PMCID: PMC3641968 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-13-68
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Figure 1Representative metabolic rate () tracings from larvae with different gene copy numbers before, during, and after 36°C exposure. Metabolic rate was measured as the volume of CO2 (μL hr-1) produced by pools of five larvae before, during and after exposure to the Hsp70-inducible temperature of 36°C. A. Larvae left at 22°C never had a rise in metabolic rate, as observed at 36°C. B, C and D. The increase in metabolic rate due to the Q10 effect of increased temperature is readily apparent when 3-copy (B), 6-copy (C) and 12-copy (D) larvae are moved from 22°C to 36°C. All genotypes exhibited a transient increase in metabolic rate above the 36°C RMR that always occurred within the first 30 minutes of 36°C exposure. The metabolic rate of larvae with 12 copies of Hsp70 rises above and beyond that of other genotypes. Shown are tracings representative of the average and maximum rise in metabolic rate observed for each genotype. Different placement of tracings on the y-axis represents differences in overall metabolic rate due to mass effects, but mass did not differ among genotypes (F=2.66, P=0.078), nor did the 22°C or 36°C RMRs (Table 1 and Additional file 2: Table S1). Variation in the Q10 among different samples of larvae is also apparent; however, Q10 also did not differ among genotypes (F=0.76, P=0.384). Tracings begin five minutes after larvae are placed at 22°C.
Effects of copy number genotype on metabolic rate
| | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mass-corrected 22°C RMR1 | 25.03 ± 0.6 (a)2 | 26.37 ± 0.5 (a) | 26.47 ± 0.8 (a) |
| Mass-corrected 36°C RMR | 39.94 ± 0.6 (a) | 41.65 ± 0.9 (a) | 39.57 ± 1.1 (a) |
| Mass-corrected 36°C maxMR | 45.10 ± 0.7 (a) | 48.35 ± 1.1 (b) | 49.16 ± 1.2 (b) |
| 1.41 ± 0.024 (a) | 1.38 ± 0.024 (a) | 1.34 ± 0.029 (a) | |
| Rise in 36°C MR | 5.15 ± 0.3 (a) | 6.69 ± 0.7 (a) | 9.20 ± 0.7 (b) |
| Rise as a % of 22°C RMR | 20.7 ± 1.2 (a) | 25.4 ± 2.7 (a) | 34.7 ± 2.5 (b) |
| Rise as a % of 36°C RMR | 13.0 ± 0.8 (a) | 16.4 ± 2.0 (a) | 23.5 ± 2.0 (b) |
| % Recovery of 22°C RMR, 0-20 min4 | 92.6 ± 2.1 (a) | 88.9 ± 2.4 (a) | 86.7 ± 2.5 (a) |
| % Recovery of 22°C RMR, 95-115 min4 | 95.6 ± 2.1 (a) | 93.5 ± 2.5 (a) | 89.9 ± 2.5 (a) |
1 Units for all measures other than percentages are μL CO2 hr-1 ± S.E. for 5 larvae. See methods for description of mass correction.
2 Within each trait, different letters indicate significant differences between copy number genotypes (P<0.05).
3.
4 Recovery was calculated from the mean metabolic rate during the first 20 min following return to 22°C and the final 20 minutes of the respirometry experiments as described in the methods.
ANCOVA of gene copy number effects on relative mRNA abundance
| | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genotype | ||||
| Genotype effects2: | | | | |
| 6 copy – 3 copy | −0.66 | −2.23 ** | −1.56 *** | −1.76 *** |
| 12 copy – 3 copy | −0.99 | −1.90 ** | −1.66 *** | −1.91 *** |
| 12 copy – 6 copy | −0.33 | +0.33 | −0.09 | −0.14 |
1 Reference gene expression included as a covariate; b is the slope estimate.
2 Estimates using Tukey’s post-hoc contrasts; smaller values of the Ct indicate higher expression levels.
* P<0.05, ** P<0.01, *** P<0.001.
Figure 2Effect of copy number genotype on metabolic rate during and after induction of . A. The rise in metabolic rate during 36°C exposure (Rise in MR), calculated as the difference between the maxMR and the 36°C RMR, differs significantly among Hsp70 genotypes (F=11.7, P<0.0001). The rise in metabolic rate of larvae with 12 copies of Hsp70 is significantly greater than that of larvae with 3 copies (P=0.00003) or 6 copies of Hsp70 (P=0.013) (N=23 replicate pools of larvae per genotype). B. After exposure to 36°C, larvae from all genotypes returned to a 22°C RMR that was lower than their initial 22°C RMR, and they failed to fully recover their initial 22°C RMR for the duration of the experiment. For each pool of larvae, we calculated the % Recovery of 22°C RMR as the mean metabolic rate 95-115 minutes after returning to 22°C divided by the initial 22°C RMR (prior to 36°C exposure). Plotted are the means of this % recovery statistic (± SE) for each genotype. Asterisks indicate that the difference in metabolic rate before and after 36°C exposure is significantly different from zero (Paired t-test, *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001).
Relative fold increase in mRNA after 36°C exposure varies among copy number genotypes
| | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 copy | 1231 | 277 | 247 |
| 6 copy | 331 | 428 | 390 |
| 12 copy | 298 | 583 | 549 |
1 Fold increase is relative to control larvae (0 min at 36°C) of the same genotype and is corrected for the reference gene Act5C as described in the methods.