Literature DB >> 23506466

Molecular hyperdiversity and evolution in very large populations.

Asher D Cutter1, Richard Jovelin, Alivia Dey.   

Abstract

The genomic density of sequence polymorphisms critically affects the sensitivity of inferences about ongoing sequence evolution, function and demographic history. Most animal and plant genomes have relatively low densities of polymorphisms, but some species are hyperdiverse with neutral nucleotide heterozygosity exceeding 5%. Eukaryotes with extremely large populations, mimicking bacterial and viral populations, present novel opportunities for studying molecular evolution in sexually reproducing taxa with complex development. In particular, hyperdiverse species can help answer controversial questions about the evolution of genome complexity, the limits of natural selection, modes of adaptation and subtleties of the mutation process. However, such systems have some inherent complications and here we identify topics in need of theoretical developments. Close relatives of the model organisms Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster provide known examples of hyperdiverse eukaryotes, encouraging functional dissection of resulting molecular evolutionary patterns. We recommend how best to exploit hyperdiverse populations for analysis, for example, in quantifying the impact of noncrossover recombination in genomes and for determining the identity and micro-evolutionary selective pressures on noncoding regulatory elements.
© 2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23506466      PMCID: PMC4065115          DOI: 10.1111/mec.12281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  261 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of synonymous codon usage in metazoans.

Authors:  Laurent Duret
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.578

2.  Evolution of branched regulatory genetic pathways: directional selection on pleiotropic loci accelerates developmental system drift.

Authors:  Norman A Johnson; Adam H Porter
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2006-08-16       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  The effect of gene conversion on intralocus associations.

Authors:  P Andolfatto; M Nordborg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Selection, recombination and demographic history in Drosophila miranda.

Authors:  Doris Bachtrog; Peter Andolfatto
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-10-08       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Models of evolution of reproductive isolation.

Authors:  M Nei; T Maruyama; C I Wu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Integrative analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome by the modENCODE project.

Authors:  Mark B Gerstein; Zhi John Lu; Eric L Van Nostrand; Chao Cheng; Bradley I Arshinoff; Tao Liu; Kevin Y Yip; Rebecca Robilotto; Andreas Rechtsteiner; Kohta Ikegami; Pedro Alves; Aurelien Chateigner; Marc Perry; Mitzi Morris; Raymond K Auerbach; Xin Feng; Jing Leng; Anne Vielle; Wei Niu; Kahn Rhrissorrakrai; Ashish Agarwal; Roger P Alexander; Galt Barber; Cathleen M Brdlik; Jennifer Brennan; Jeremy Jean Brouillet; Adrian Carr; Ming-Sin Cheung; Hiram Clawson; Sergio Contrino; Luke O Dannenberg; Abby F Dernburg; Arshad Desai; Lindsay Dick; Andréa C Dosé; Jiang Du; Thea Egelhofer; Sevinc Ercan; Ghia Euskirchen; Brent Ewing; Elise A Feingold; Reto Gassmann; Peter J Good; Phil Green; Francois Gullier; Michelle Gutwein; Mark S Guyer; Lukas Habegger; Ting Han; Jorja G Henikoff; Stefan R Henz; Angie Hinrichs; Heather Holster; Tony Hyman; A Leo Iniguez; Judith Janette; Morten Jensen; Masaomi Kato; W James Kent; Ellen Kephart; Vishal Khivansara; Ekta Khurana; John K Kim; Paulina Kolasinska-Zwierz; Eric C Lai; Isabel Latorre; Amber Leahey; Suzanna Lewis; Paul Lloyd; Lucas Lochovsky; Rebecca F Lowdon; Yaniv Lubling; Rachel Lyne; Michael MacCoss; Sebastian D Mackowiak; Marco Mangone; Sheldon McKay; Desirea Mecenas; Gennifer Merrihew; David M Miller; Andrew Muroyama; John I Murray; Siew-Loon Ooi; Hoang Pham; Taryn Phippen; Elicia A Preston; Nikolaus Rajewsky; Gunnar Rätsch; Heidi Rosenbaum; Joel Rozowsky; Kim Rutherford; Peter Ruzanov; Mihail Sarov; Rajkumar Sasidharan; Andrea Sboner; Paul Scheid; Eran Segal; Hyunjin Shin; Chong Shou; Frank J Slack; Cindie Slightam; Richard Smith; William C Spencer; E O Stinson; Scott Taing; Teruaki Takasaki; Dionne Vafeados; Ksenia Voronina; Guilin Wang; Nicole L Washington; Christina M Whittle; Beijing Wu; Koon-Kiu Yan; Georg Zeller; Zheng Zha; Mei Zhong; Xingliang Zhou; Julie Ahringer; Susan Strome; Kristin C Gunsalus; Gos Micklem; X Shirley Liu; Valerie Reinke; Stuart K Kim; LaDeana W Hillier; Steven Henikoff; Fabio Piano; Michael Snyder; Lincoln Stein; Jason D Lieb; Robert H Waterston
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Non-adaptive origins of interactome complexity.

Authors:  Ariel Fernández; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  The genetics of human adaptation: hard sweeps, soft sweeps, and polygenic adaptation.

Authors:  Jonathan K Pritchard; Joseph K Pickrell; Graham Coop
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Fine-scale signatures of molecular evolution reconcile models of indel-associated mutation.

Authors:  Richard Jovelin; Asher D Cutter
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.416

View more
  36 in total

1.  DNA sequence diversity and the efficiency of natural selection in animal mitochondrial DNA.

Authors:  J James; D Castellano; A Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Biological species in the viral world.

Authors:  Louis-Marie Bobay; Howard Ochman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Specialist versus generalist life histories and nucleotide diversity in Caenorhabditis nematodes.

Authors:  Shuning Li; Richard Jovelin; Toyoshi Yoshiga; Ryusei Tanaka; Asher D Cutter
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Mainstreaming Caenorhabditis elegans in experimental evolution.

Authors:  Jeremy C Gray; Asher D Cutter
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Purifying selection, drift, and reversible mutation with arbitrarily high mutation rates.

Authors:  Brian Charlesworth; Kavita Jain
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Determinants of genetic diversity.

Authors:  Hans Ellegren; Nicolas Galtier
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 7.  Males, Outcrossing, and Sexual Selection in Caenorhabditis Nematodes.

Authors:  Asher D Cutter; Levi T Morran; Patrick C Phillips
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  A long journey to reproducible results.

Authors:  Gordon J Lithgow; Monica Driscoll; Patrick Phillips
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Molecular hyperdiversity defines populations of the nematode Caenorhabditis brenneri.

Authors:  Alivia Dey; Cecilia K W Chan; Cristel G Thomas; Asher D Cutter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Genomic Characterization of the Barnacle Balanus improvisus Reveals Extreme Nucleotide Diversity in Coding Regions.

Authors:  Magnus Alm Rosenblad; Anna Abramova; Ulrika Lind; Páll Ólason; Stefania Giacomello; Björn Nystedt; Anders Blomberg
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 3.619

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.