Literature DB >> 23504822

Intracellular protein and nucleic acid measured in eight cell types using deep-ultraviolet mass mapping.

Man C Cheung1, Rebecca LaCroix, Brian K McKenna, Ling Liu, James Winkelman, Daniel J Ehrlich.   

Abstract

We present measurements by deep-ultraviolet mass mapping of nucleic acid (NA) and protein for five commonly cultured and three primary cell types. The dry mass distribution at submicron resolution was determined on a single-cell basis for 250-500 cells from each of these types. Since the method carries a direct reference to a spectrophotometric standard (molar extinction coefficient), we are able to calibrate the absolute weight distributions both on a cell-to-cell basis within each type and across types. We also provide a calibration in absolute mass units for fluorescence-based measurements (flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy). As might be expected the cultured cell lines show a high concentration of nucleic acids in the nuclear compartment, much larger than the genomic 2C number even in the G1 stage. The whole-cell nucleic-acid/protein ratio was found to be a characteristic of cell lines that persists independent of cell cycle and, as a result, this ratio has some value for phenotyping. Primary chicken red blood cells (cRBC), often used as a cytometry standard, were determined to have a nuclear-isolated nucleic acid content much closer to the genomic number than the cultured cell lines (cRBC: 3.00 pg total NA, 2.30 pg DNA, and 0.70 pg RNA). The individual blastomeres (n = 54) from mouse embryos at eight-cell stage were measured and found to vary by more than a factor or two in total protein and nucleic acid content (0.8-2.3 ng total protein, 70-150 pg total NA). The ratio of nucleic acid to protein was more nearly constant for each blastomere from a particular embryo and this ratio was found to be an identifying characteristic that varies from embryo to embryo obtained from a single flushing of a mouse.
Copyright © 2013 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23504822     DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.22277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytometry A        ISSN: 1552-4922            Impact factor:   4.355


  17 in total

1.  Molecular crowding enhances facilitated diffusion of two human DNA glycosylases.

Authors:  Shannen L Cravens; Joseph D Schonhoft; Meng M Rowland; Alyssa A Rodriguez; Breeana G Anderson; James T Stivers
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  A cell is more than the sum of its (dilute) parts: A brief history of quinary structure.

Authors:  Rachel D Cohen; Gary J Pielak
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 3.  Physicochemical properties of cells and their effects on intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs).

Authors:  Francois-Xavier Theillet; Andres Binolfi; Tamara Frembgen-Kesner; Karan Hingorani; Mohona Sarkar; Ciara Kyne; Conggang Li; Peter B Crowley; Lila Gierasch; Gary J Pielak; Adrian H Elcock; Anne Gershenson; Philipp Selenko
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  Molecular Effects of Concentrated Solutes on Protein Hydration, Dynamics, and Electrostatics.

Authors:  Luciano A Abriata; Enrico Spiga; Matteo Dal Peraro
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Large cosolutes, small cosolutes, and dihydrofolate reductase activity.

Authors:  Luis C Acosta; Gerardo M Perez Goncalves; Gary J Pielak; Annelise H Gorensek-Benitez
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Label-free hematology analysis using deep-ultraviolet microscopy.

Authors:  Ashkan Ojaghi; Gabriel Carrazana; Christina Caruso; Asad Abbas; David R Myers; Wilbur A Lam; Francisco E Robles
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  DNA Facilitates Oligomerization and Prevents Aggregation via DNA Networks.

Authors:  Theodore J Litberg; Brianne Docter; Michael P Hughes; Jennifer Bourne; Scott Horowitz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Live-cell mass profiling: an emerging approach in quantitative biophysics.

Authors:  Thomas A Zangle; Michael A Teitell
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 28.547

9.  Deep-UV biological imaging by lanthanide ion molecular protection.

Authors:  Yasuaki Kumamoto; Katsumasa Fujita; Nicholas Isaac Smith; Satoshi Kawata
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 3.732

10.  Computational On-Chip Imaging of Nanoparticles and Biomolecules using Ultraviolet Light.

Authors:  Mustafa Ugur Daloglu; Aniruddha Ray; Zoltan Gorocs; Matthew Xiong; Ravinder Malik; Gal Bitan; Euan McLeod; Aydogan Ozcan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.