PURPOSE: KRAS mutations are predictive of lack of response to monoclonal antibodies (mAb) against EGFR in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Most wild-type KRAS patients, however, are also resistant. Retrospective data suggest that EGFR silencing play a role in resistance to therapy. We conducted a study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of decitabine (a hypomethylating agent) in combination with panitumumab (mAb against EGFR) in mCRC patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: 20 patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC were included in this phase I/II study. Patients were treated with decitabine at 45 mg/m(2) IV over 2 h on day 1 and 15 and panitumumab 6 mg/kg IV over 1 h on day 8 and 22 every 28 days. Blood samples were collected at baseline, day 8, 15 and 22. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction was used to measure promoter-specific methylation in peripheral-blood cells (PBMCs). RESULTS: The most common adverse events were grade 1-2 (rash and hypomagnesemia); 3 (16 %) patients had grade III-IV neutropenia including one patient with neutropenic fever. Two of 20 patients (10 %) had a partial response. Both had previously received cetuximab. Ten patients had stable disease (3 of them longer than 16 weeks). Decreased methylation of the MAGE promoter was not evidenced in PBMCs. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of decitabine and panitumumab was well tolerated and showed activity in wild-type KRAS mCRC patients previously treated with cetuximab. Target modulation in surrogate tissues was not achieved and tumor biopsies were not available. Future studies evaluating hypomethylating agents in combination with EGFR mAb in patients with mCRC are warranted.
PURPOSE:KRAS mutations are predictive of lack of response to monoclonal antibodies (mAb) against EGFR in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Most wild-type KRASpatients, however, are also resistant. Retrospective data suggest that EGFR silencing play a role in resistance to therapy. We conducted a study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of decitabine (a hypomethylating agent) in combination with panitumumab (mAb against EGFR) in mCRC patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: 20 patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC were included in this phase I/II study. Patients were treated with decitabine at 45 mg/m(2) IV over 2 h on day 1 and 15 and panitumumab 6 mg/kg IV over 1 h on day 8 and 22 every 28 days. Blood samples were collected at baseline, day 8, 15 and 22. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction was used to measure promoter-specific methylation in peripheral-blood cells (PBMCs). RESULTS: The most common adverse events were grade 1-2 (rash and hypomagnesemia); 3 (16 %) patients had grade III-IV neutropenia including one patient with neutropenic fever. Two of 20 patients (10 %) had a partial response. Both had previously received cetuximab. Ten patients had stable disease (3 of them longer than 16 weeks). Decreased methylation of the MAGE promoter was not evidenced in PBMCs. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of decitabine and panitumumab was well tolerated and showed activity in wild-type KRAS mCRC patients previously treated with cetuximab. Target modulation in surrogate tissues was not achieved and tumor biopsies were not available. Future studies evaluating hypomethylating agents in combination with EGFR mAb in patients with mCRC are warranted.
Authors: Clara Montagut; Alba Dalmases; Beatriz Bellosillo; Marta Crespo; Silvia Pairet; Mar Iglesias; Marta Salido; Manuel Gallen; Scot Marsters; Siao Ping Tsai; André Minoche; Somasekar Seshagiri; Seshagiri Somasekar; Sergi Serrano; Heinz Himmelbauer; Joaquim Bellmunt; Ana Rovira; Jeff Settleman; Francesc Bosch; Joan Albanell Journal: Nat Med Date: 2012-01-22 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: R Abele; M Clavel; P Dodion; U Bruntsch; S Gundersen; J Smyth; J Renard; M van Glabbeke; H M Pinedo Journal: Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol Date: 1987-12
Authors: Rafael G Amado; Michael Wolf; Marc Peeters; Eric Van Cutsem; Salvatore Siena; Daniel J Freeman; Todd Juan; Robert Sikorski; Sid Suggs; Robert Radinsky; Scott D Patterson; David D Chang Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-03-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Luis A Diaz; Richard T Williams; Jian Wu; Isaac Kinde; J Randolph Hecht; Jordan Berlin; Benjamin Allen; Ivana Bozic; Johannes G Reiter; Martin A Nowak; Kenneth W Kinzler; Kelly S Oliner; Bert Vogelstein Journal: Nature Date: 2012-06-28 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Carmen J Allegra; J Milburn Jessup; Mark R Somerfield; Stanley R Hamilton; Elizabeth H Hammond; Daniel F Hayes; Pamela K McAllister; Roscoe F Morton; Richard L Schilsky Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-02-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Robert Brown; Edward Curry; Luca Magnani; Charlotte S Wilhelm-Benartzi; Jane Borley Journal: Nat Rev Cancer Date: 2014-09-25 Impact factor: 60.716
Authors: Janneke F Linnekamp; Raju Kandimalla; Evelyn Fessler; Joan H de Jong; Hans M Rodermond; Gregor G W van Bochove; Frans O The; Cornelis J A Punt; Willem A Bemelman; Anthony W H van de Ven; Pieter J Tanis; Elles M Kemper; Lianne Koens; Evelien Dekker; Louis Vermeulen; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Jan Paul Medema Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 6.639