Literature DB >> 23504350

Rapid on-site evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound core biopsy specimens has excellent specificity and positive predictive value for gastrointestinal lesions.

Kumar Krishnan1, Sharvari Dalal, Ritu Nayar, Rajesh N Keswani, Laurie Keefer, Srinadh Komanduri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with fine needle aspiration (FNA) is a safe and effective way to sample lesions in the gastrointestinal tract. Rapid on-site specimen evaluation (ROSE) improves the accuracy of EUS-FNA. While data suggests that EUS with fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) is effective, it remains unclear if ROSE is predictive of a final diagnosis when obtaining core specimens. AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the utility of ROSE in achieving a final diagnosis for EUS-FNB core specimens.
METHODS: We evaluated 60 consecutive patients referred for EUS guided sampling of lesions within or adjacent to the gastrointestinal tract. All patients underwent EUS-FNB to evaluate the additive value of ROSE to the diagnostic accuracy of specimens obtained using a core biopsy needle. EUS-FNA was also performed in a majority of cases.
RESULTS: EUS-FNB was feasible in all 60 cases; on-site specimen adequacy and final diagnostic accuracy was 58 % [95 % confidence intervals (CI) 45.1-71.2] and 83 % (95 % CI 71.9-91.5), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value of ROSE for core biopsies were 65, 100, 100, and 39 %, respectively. On-site adequacy and diagnostic accuracy for EUS-FNA was 38 % (95 % CI 22.2-53.5) and 63 % (95 % CI 50.1-75.8), respectively. There were no significant complications.
CONCLUSIONS: EUS-FNB is safe, feasible, and effective. ROSE of the core biopsy provides excellent PPV; however, an inadequate ROSE appears to be of limited value. Further prospective studies are needed to assess the optimal handling and onsite processing of core specimens to determine whether ROSE is beneficial for EUS-FNB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23504350     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-013-2613-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  13 in total

1.  Feasibility and yield of a new EUS histology needle: results from a multicenter, pooled, cohort study.

Authors:  Julio Iglesias-Garcia; Jan-Werner Poley; Alberto Larghi; Marc Giovannini; Maria Chiara Petrone; Ihab Abdulkader; Genevieve Monges; Guido Costamagna; Paolo Arcidiacono; Katharina Biermann; Guido Rindi; Erwan Bories; Claudio Dogloni; Marco Bruno; J Enrique Dominguez-Muñoz
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Clinical impact of EUS-guided Trucut biopsy results on decision making for patients with gastric subepithelial tumors ≥ 2 cm in diameter.

Authors:  Jeong Hoon Lee; Kee Don Choi; Mi-Young Kim; Kwi-Sook Choi; Do Hoon Kim; Young Soo Park; Kab Choong Kim; Ho June Song; Gin Hyug Lee; Hwoon-Yong Jung; Jeong Hwan Yook; Byung Sik Kim; Yoon-Koo Kang; Jin-Ho Kim
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Indications, results, and clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline.

Authors:  J-M Dumonceau; M Polkowski; A Larghi; P Vilmann; M Giovannini; J-L Frossard; D Heresbach; B Pujol; G Fernández-Esparrach; E Vazquez-Sequeiros; A Ginès
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 4.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy and interventional endoscopic ultrasonography. Emerging technologies.

Authors:  K J Chang; M J Wiersema
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  1997-04

5.  Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of suspected pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  F Gress; K Gottlieb; S Sherman; G Lehman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-03-20       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Comparison of EUS-guided 19-gauge Trucut needle biopsy with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration.

Authors:  S Varadarajulu; M Fraig; N Schmulewitz; S Roberts; S Wildi; R H Hawes; B J Hoffman; M B Wallace
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 10.093

7.  Endosonography-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in the evaluation of pancreatic masses.

Authors:  Gavin C Harewood; Maurits J Wiersema
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Efficacy, safety, and predictive factors for a positive yield of EUS-guided Trucut biopsy: a large tertiary referral center experience.

Authors:  Titus Thomas; Phillip V Kaye; Krish Ragunath; Guruprasad Aithal
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Preliminary experience with an EUS-guided trucut biopsy needle compared with EUS-guided FNA.

Authors:  Michael J Levy; Mary Lou Jondal; Jonathan Clain; Maurits J Wiersema
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Histological diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis using EUS-guided trucut biopsy: a comparison study with EUS-FNA.

Authors:  Nobumasa Mizuno; Vikram Bhatia; Waki Hosoda; Akira Sawaki; Noriyuki Hoki; Kazuo Hara; Tadayuki Takagi; Shigeru B H Ko; Yasushi Yatabe; Hidemi Goto; Kenji Yamao
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 7.527

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Imaging modalities for characterising focal pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Lawrence Mj Best; Vishal Rawji; Stephen P Pereira; Brian R Davidson; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-17

2.  Canalization technique to obtain deep tissue biopsy of gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors as an alternative to conventional known techniques.

Authors:  Ramón Abad-Belando; Modesto J Varas-Lorenzo; Carlos Pons-Vilardell; Xavier Puig-Torrus; Marta Pla-Alcaraz; Antonio Monleón-Getino; Elena Sánchez-Vizcaíno-Mengual
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.628

3.  Addition of Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration and On-Site Cytology to EUS-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy Increases Procedure Time but Not Diagnostic Accuracy.

Authors:  Rajesh N Keswani; Kumar Krishnan; Sachin Wani; Laurie Keefer; Srinadh Komanduri
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2014-05-31

Review 4.  Rapid on-site evaluation of endoscopic-ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration diagnosis of pancreatic masses.

Authors:  Julio Iglesias-Garcia; Jose Lariño-Noia; Ihab Abdulkader; J Enrique Domínguez-Muñoz
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  When to puncture, when not to puncture: Submucosal tumors.

Authors:  Wajeeh Salah; Douglas O Faigel
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.628

Review 6.  Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Pancreatic Lesions: A Systematic Review of Technical and Procedural Variables.

Authors:  Bhairvi S Jani; Fadi Rzouq; Shreyas Saligram; Diego Lim; Amit Rastogi; John Bonino; Mojtaba Olyaee
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2016-01

Review 7.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle core biopsy for the diagnosis of pancreatic malignant lesions: a systematic review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yongtao Yang; Lianyong Li; Changmin Qu; Shuwen Liang; Bolun Zeng; Zhiwen Luo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue sampling of small subepithelial tumors of the upper gastrointestinal tract with a 22-gauge core biopsy needle.

Authors:  Christoph Schlag; Christoph Menzel; Manuela Götzberger; Simon Nennstiel; Peter Klare; Stefan Wagenpfeil; Roland M Schmid; Gregor Weirich; Stefan von Delius
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2017-03

9.  A randomized controlled cross-over trial and cost analysis comparing endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration and fine needle biopsy.

Authors:  A Aziz Aadam; Sachin Wani; Ashley Amick; Janak N Shah; Yasser M Bhat; Christopher M Hamerski; Jason B Klapman; V Raman Muthusamy; Rabindra R Watson; Alfred W Rademaker; Rajesh N Keswani; Laurie Keefer; Ananya Das; Srinadh Komanduri
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-05

Review 10.  Efforts to improve the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic tumors.

Authors:  Akane Yamabe; Atsushi Irisawa; Manoop S Bhutani; Goro Shibukawa; Mariko Fujisawa; Ai Sato; Yoshitsugu Yoshida; Noriyuki Arakawa; Tsunehiko Ikeda; Ryo Igarashi; Takumi Maki; Shogo Yamamoto
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.628

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.