Literature DB >> 21889136

Clinical impact of EUS-guided Trucut biopsy results on decision making for patients with gastric subepithelial tumors ≥ 2 cm in diameter.

Jeong Hoon Lee1, Kee Don Choi, Mi-Young Kim, Kwi-Sook Choi, Do Hoon Kim, Young Soo Park, Kab Choong Kim, Ho June Song, Gin Hyug Lee, Hwoon-Yong Jung, Jeong Hwan Yook, Byung Sik Kim, Yoon-Koo Kang, Jin-Ho Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preoperative pathologic diagnosis of a gastric subepithelial tumor (SET) may improve clinical decision making. However, the clinical impact of EUS-guided Trucut biopsy (EUS-TCB) data on decision making in patients with a gastric SET has not been assessed.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of EUS-TCB information on the clinical management of patients with a gastric SET.
DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Sixty-five patients with gastric SETs 2 cm or larger in diameter. INTERVENTION: EUS-TCB. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The number of patients for whom treatment plans were changed because of EUS-TCB results.
RESULTS: Nine SETs were not punctured by the TCB needle because of technical problems, and we were unable to obtain adequate subepithelial tissue from 19 SETs. Treatment plans were changed for 18 of 65 patients (27.7%). The changes were avoiding unnecessary resection (7 benign SETs ≥ 3 cm in diameter), scheduling for definitive treatment (6 GI stromal tumors and 1 carcinoid tumor), and modifying the surgical field (3 large GI stromal tumors and 1 carcinoma). When we assessed treatment plans relative to tumor location, we found that avoiding unnecessary resection was associated with the presence of cardiac SETs. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study with a small number of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: EUS-TCB changed or influenced management decisions in 18 of 65 patients (27.7%) with gastric SETs. Patients could receive proper and tailored surgery, medical treatment, or surveillance according to size and location of SETs with EUS-TCB.
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21889136     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.06.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  27 in total

1.  Diagnostic efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle sampling for upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiao-Cen Zhang; Quan-Lin Li; Yong-Fu Yu; Li-Qing Yao; Mei-Dong Xu; Yi-Qun Zhang; Yun-Shi Zhong; Wei-Feng Chen; Ping-Hong Zhou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  A feasible modified biopsy method for tissue diagnosis of gastric subepithelial tumors.

Authors:  Jung Ho Kim; Jun-Won Chung; Minsu Ha; Min Young Rim; Jong Joon Lee; Jungsuk An; Yoon Jae Kim; Kyoung Oh Kim; Kwang An Kwon; Dong Kyun Park; Yeon Suk Kim; Duck Joo Choi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided single-incision needle knife biopsy for gastric subepithelial tumors: comparison with resected specimens.

Authors:  Joon Sung Kim; Byung-Wook Kim; Gi Jun Kim; Young Wook Kim; Seung Ji Ryu; Sung Min Park; Jeong-Seon Ji; Sun Young Jun
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Yields and Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided 19-Gauge Trucut Biopsy versus 22-Gauge Fine Needle Aspiration for Diagnosing Gastric Subepithelial Tumors.

Authors:  Hee Kyong Na; Jeong Hoon Lee; Young Soo Park; Ji Yong Ahn; Kwi-Sook Choi; Do Hoon Kim; Kee Don Choi; Ho June Song; Gin Hyug Lee; Hwoon-Yong Jung; Jin-Ho Kim
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2015-03-27

5.  Rapid on-site evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound core biopsy specimens has excellent specificity and positive predictive value for gastrointestinal lesions.

Authors:  Kumar Krishnan; Sharvari Dalal; Ritu Nayar; Rajesh N Keswani; Laurie Keefer; Srinadh Komanduri
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Efficiency and safety of endoscopic resection in the management of subepithelial lesions of the stomach.

Authors:  Sébastien Godat; Maxime Robert; Fabrice Caillol; Erwan Bories; Christian Pesenti; Chiara De Cassan; Jean Philippe Ratone; Flora Poizat; Marc Giovannini
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 4.623

7.  Tissue diagnosis of GI subepithelial tumor only through Trucut biopsy under a forward-viewing endoscope: applicability as newer diagnostic modality.

Authors:  Weon Jin Ko; Ga Won Song; Ki Baik Hahm; Sung Pyo Hong; Joo Young Cho; Jun-Hyung Cho; So Young Jin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling versus FNA in the diagnosis of subepithelial lesions: a large multicenter study.

Authors:  Diogo T H de Moura; Thomas R McCarty; Pichamol Jirapinyo; Igor B Ribeiro; Victor K Flumignan; Fedaa Najdawai; Marvin Ryou; Linda S Lee; Christopher C Thompson
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Diagnosis of ectopic pancreas by endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration.

Authors:  Augustin Attwell; Sharon Sams; Norio Fukami
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection of large (≥3 cm) subepithelial tumors located in the cardia.

Authors:  Jun Li; Jian Tang; G W Lua; Jie Chen; Xingang Shi; Feng Liu; Zhaoshen Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.