Literature DB >> 23503670

No effect of subperiosteal growth factor application on periosteal neo-chondrogenesis in osteoperiosteal bone grafts for osteochondral defect repair.

Tobias Gotterbarm1, Steffen J Breusch, Simona Berardi Vilei, Pierre Mainil-Varlet, Wiltrud Richter, Martin Jung.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of subperiosteal injection of chondroinductive growth factors on the histological and biomechanical outcome of autologous osteoperiosteal grafts.
METHODS: Thirty six standardised osteochondral defects were created in the trochlear groove of 18 Göttinger Minipigs and evaluated after six, 12 and 52 weeks. Defects were treated with press-fit implantation of autologous osteoperiosteal cylindrical block-grafts with or without subperiosteal injection of a chondroinductive growth factor mixture (GFM).
RESULTS: Histomorphological analysis showed complete osseointegration of all grafts from six weeks. The periosteum remained in place in 35 of 36 cases. Fibrocartilagineous repair tissue formation occurred at the cambium layer with a maximum at 12 weeks in both groups. Histomorphological grading and biomechanical testing showed highest values at 12 weeks, with signs of tissue degradation at one year. There was no significant difference between both groups.
CONCLUSION: Transplantation of autologous osteoperiosteal grafts is an effective method to restore subchondral bone defects, but not the overlying cartilage as the repair tissue deteriorates in the long term. Subperiosteal growth factors injection did not stimulate tissue differentiation on a biomechanical and histomorphological level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23503670      PMCID: PMC3664158          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-1827-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  36 in total

1.  Localization of chondrocyte precursors in periosteum.

Authors:  Y Ito; J S Fitzsimmons; A Sanyal; M A Mello; N Mukherjee; S W O'Driscoll
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 2.  Articular cartilage repair: the role of bone morphogenetic proteins.

Authors:  M Pecina; M Jelic; S Martinovic; M Haspl; S Vukicevic
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2002-04-20       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Effects of cartilage-derived morphogenetic proteins and osteogenic protein-1 on osteochondrogenic differentiation of periosteum-derived cells.

Authors:  R Gruber; C Mayer; K Bobacz; M T Krauth; W Graninger; F P Luyten; L Erlacher
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.736

4.  A novel recirculating flow-perfusion bioreactor for periosteal chondrogenesis.

Authors:  Yih-Wen Tarng; Bing-Feng Huang; Fong-Chin Su
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Minimum ten-year results of a prospective randomised study of autologous chondrocyte implantation versus mosaicplasty for symptomatic articular cartilage lesions of the knee.

Authors:  G Bentley; L C Biant; S Vijayan; S Macmull; J A Skinner; R W J Carrington
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2012-04

6.  Spontaneous repair of full-thickness defects of articular cartilage in a goat model. A preliminary study.

Authors:  D W Jackson; P A Lalor; H M Aberman; T M Simon
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Brief exposure to high-dose transforming growth factor-beta1 enhances periosteal chondrogenesis in vitro: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Yasushi Miura; Javad Parvizi; James S Fitzsimmons; Shawn W O'Driscoll
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Activity levels are higher after osteochondral autograft transfer mosaicplasty than after microfracture for articular cartilage defects of the knee: a retrospective comparative study.

Authors:  Aaron J Krych; Heather W Harnly; Scott A Rodeo; Riley J Williams
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Synthetic resorbable scaffolds for the treatment of isolated patellofemoral cartilage defects in young patients: magnetic resonance imaging and clinical evaluation.

Authors:  Nayana Joshi; Mercè Reverte-Vinaixa; Eugenio Wenceslao Díaz-Ferreiro; Rosa Domínguez-Oronoz
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 10.  The role of periosteum in cartilage repair.

Authors:  S W O'Driscoll; J S Fitzsimmons
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Periosteum derived stem cells for regenerative medicine proposals: Boosting current knowledge.

Authors:  Concetta Ferretti; Monica Mattioli-Belmonte
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2014-07-26       Impact factor: 5.326

2.  A new bioabsorbable cotton-textured synthetic polymer scaffold for osteochondral repair.

Authors:  Ryosuke Sakata; Takeshi Kokubu; Yutaka Mifune; Atsuyuki Inui; Hanako Nishimoto; Hiroyuki Fujioka; Ryosuke Kuroda; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Advancing osteochondral tissue engineering: bone morphogenetic protein, transforming growth factor, and fibroblast growth factor signaling drive ordered differentiation of periosteal cells resulting in stable cartilage and bone formation in vivo.

Authors:  L F Mendes; H Katagiri; W L Tam; Y C Chai; L Geris; S J Roberts; F P Luyten
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 6.832

Review 4.  Current Trends in the Evaluation of Osteochondral Lesion Treatments: Histology, Histomorphometry, and Biomechanics in Preclinical Models.

Authors:  M Maglio; S Brogini; S Pagani; G Giavaresi; M Tschon
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 3.411

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.