Literature DB >> 22637203

Activity levels are higher after osteochondral autograft transfer mosaicplasty than after microfracture for articular cartilage defects of the knee: a retrospective comparative study.

Aaron J Krych1, Heather W Harnly, Scott A Rodeo, Riley J Williams.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is limited information regarding direct comparisons of the outcome of osteochondral autograft transfer (OAT) mosaicplasty and microfracture for the treatment of isolated articular cartilage defects of the knee. The purpose of this retrospective comparative study was to compare the general health outcomes, knee function, and Marx Activity Rating Scale scores for patients treated with OAT or microfracture for symptomatic chondral defects of the femoral condyles or trochlea. We hypothesized that the patients in the two treatment groups would have similar clinical outcomes at intermediate-term follow-up.
METHODS: Ninety-six patients with full-thickness cartilage defects of the femoral condyles or trochlea were treated with either OAT mosaicplasty (n = 48) or microfracture (n = 48). The average age of the patients (thirty-two male and sixteen female in each group) at the time of surgery was 29.7 years in the OAT group and 32.5 years in the microfracture group. Patients were prospectively evaluated at baseline and at one, two, three, and five years postoperatively with use of validated clinical outcome measures including the Short Form-36 (SF-36) physical component, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Knee Outcome Survey activities of daily living, and Marx Activity Rating Scale instruments. Comparisons between outcomes before and after treatment or between outcomes after microfracture and mosaicplasty were made with use of two-tailed tests.
RESULTS: At the time of the latest follow-up, both groups demonstrated significant increases in SF-36 physical component, Knee Outcome Survey activities of daily living, and IKDC scores compared with baseline. These scores did not differ significantly between the two groups at any of the follow-up time points. However, the OAT group demonstrated a significantly greater improvement in the Marx Activity Rating Scale scores from baseline to the two-year (p = 0.001), three-year (p = 0.03), and five-year (p = 0.02) time points compared with the microfracture group.
CONCLUSIONS: In the present retrospective comparative study, the hypothesis that patients treated with microfracture or OAT mosaicplasty for symptomatic articular cartilage defects of the femoral condyles or trochlea would have similar clinical outcomes at intermediate-term follow-up was affirmed for general health outcome and for knee function. However, patients treated with OAT mosaicplasty maintained a superior level of athletic activity compared with those treated with microfracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22637203     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  50 in total

1.  Outcomes of Patellofemoral Osteochondral Lesions Treated With Structural Grafts in Patients Older Than 40 Years.

Authors:  Ryan M Degen; Nathan W Coleman; Danielle Tetreault; Brenda Chang; Greg T Mahony; Christopher L Camp; Shawn G Anthony; Riley J Williams
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation of the Knee in Patients with an Elevated Body Mass Index.

Authors:  Dean Wang; Brian J Rebolledo; David M Dare; Mollyann D Pais; Matthew R Cohn; Kristofer J Jones; Riley J Williams
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 3.  Microfracture for the treatment of cartilage defects in the knee joint - A golden standard?

Authors:  Christoph Erggelet; P Vavken
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2016-06-28

4.  Tibial Allograft Transfer for Medial Tibial Plateau Resurfacing.

Authors:  Jonathan A Godin; Salvatore Frangiamore; Jorge Chahla; Mark E Cinque; Nicholas N DePhillipo; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-05-29

5.  Effects of the combination of microfracture and self-assembling Peptide filling on the repair of a clinically relevant trochlear defect in an equine model.

Authors:  Rachel E Miller; Alan J Grodzinsky; Myra F Barrett; Han-Hwa Hung; Eliot H Frank; Natasha M Werpy; C Wayne McIlwraith; David D Frisbie
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 6.  Cell-based articular cartilage repair: the link between development and regeneration.

Authors:  K L Caldwell; J Wang
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 7.  Return to sport after the surgical management of articular cartilage lesions in the knee: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Aaron J Krych; Ayoosh Pareek; Alexander H King; Nick R Johnson; Michael J Stuart; Riley J Williams
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  Cell-based tissue engineering strategies used in the clinical repair of articular cartilage.

Authors:  Brian J Huang; Jerry C Hu; Kyriacos A Athanasiou
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Osteochondral autografts.

Authors:  Shantanu Patil; Sachin R Tapasvi
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-12

10.  Ten-Year Outcomes and Risk Factors After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A MOON Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Kurt P Spindler; Laura J Huston; Kevin M Chagin; Michael W Kattan; Emily K Reinke; Annunziato Amendola; Jack T Andrish; Robert H Brophy; Charles L Cox; Warren R Dunn; David C Flanigan; Morgan H Jones; Christopher C Kaeding; Robert A Magnussen; Robert G Marx; Matthew J Matava; Eric C McCarty; Richard D Parker; Angela D Pedroza; Armando F Vidal; Michelle L Wolcott; Brian R Wolf; Rick W Wright
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 6.202

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.