Literature DB >> 22491793

Synthetic resorbable scaffolds for the treatment of isolated patellofemoral cartilage defects in young patients: magnetic resonance imaging and clinical evaluation.

Nayana Joshi1, Mercè Reverte-Vinaixa, Eugenio Wenceslao Díaz-Ferreiro, Rosa Domínguez-Oronoz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical management of patellar cartilage defects remains controversial. The ideal technique to regenerate hyaline cartilage is not yet defined. However, a synthetic resorbable osteochondral scaffold plug (TruFit CB) seems to offer a treatment option with good results at short-term follow-up, at least in the condylar setting. HYPOTHESIS: A synthetic implant provides a simple and efficacious means of treating the cartilage defects of the patellofemoral joint in young patients. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS: A study was designed to evaluate prospectively short- and medium-term results in patients with osteochondral patellar defects treated with synthetic reabsorbable scaffolds. Patient outcome scores (Short Form 36 [SF-36] and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS]), demographics, prior surgeries, and data from a physical examination were collected at baseline (before implantation) and at 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Defect characteristics were collected during implantation. Diagnosis and monitoring were performed by magnetic resonance imaging.
RESULTS: Ten patients with a mean age of 33.3 years (range, 16-49 years) were evaluated prospectively at 24 months' follow-up. The number of plugs used for each patient ranged from 1 to 4. At 1-year follow-up, the results were satisfactory in 8 of 10 patients, and poor in 2, according to clinical assessment (KOOS, visual analog scale, and SF-36). At 18 months of follow-up, all patients except one complained of pain and knee swelling. Reoperation rate for implant failure at final follow-up was 70%. Magnetic resonance imaging at final follow-up showed a cylindrical cavity of fibrous tissue instead of subchondral bone restoration.
CONCLUSION: A synthetic implant can improve symptoms and joint function, especially for small lesions, only for a short period of time. However, 2 years of monitoring has shown its failure in restoring the subchondral bone despite the formation of predominant hyaline cartilage from synthetic resorbable scaffolds. Under current conditions and according to our experience, we do not recommend TruFit synthetic implants for osteochondral patellar defects in active patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22491793     DOI: 10.1177/0363546512441585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  27 in total

1.  Outcomes of Patellofemoral Osteochondral Lesions Treated With Structural Grafts in Patients Older Than 40 Years.

Authors:  Ryan M Degen; Nathan W Coleman; Danielle Tetreault; Brenda Chang; Greg T Mahony; Christopher L Camp; Shawn G Anthony; Riley J Williams
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral knee defects with resorbable biphasic synthetic scaffold: clinical and radiological results and long-term survival analysis.

Authors:  Riccardo D'Ambrosi; Francesco Giacco; Vincenza Ragone; Nicola Ursino
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Clinical and radiological outcome for Trufit Plug in the treatment of chondral and osteochondral lesions at a minimum of 2 years.

Authors:  Amir Azam; Mark Forster; Angus Robertson
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-01-10

Review 4.  The current state of scaffolds for musculoskeletal regenerative applications.

Authors:  Benjamin D Smith; Daniel A Grande
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 20.543

5.  Treatment of focal chondral lesions in the knee using a synthetic scaffold plug: Long-term clinical and radiological results.

Authors:  Faiz S Shivji; Aadil Mumith; Sam Yasen; Joel Tk Melton; Adrian J Wilson
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-01-14

6.  Poor osteochondral repair by a biomimetic collagen scaffold: 1- to 3-year clinical and radiological follow-up.

Authors:  Bjørn Borsøe Christensen; Casper Bindzus Foldager; Jonas Jensen; Niels Christian Jensen; Martin Lind
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  Early osteoarthritis of the patellofemoral joint.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Arendt; Massimo Berruto; Giuseppe Filardo; Mario Ronga; Stefano Zaffagnini; Jack Farr; Paolo Ferrua; Alberto Grassi; Vincenzo Condello
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  No effect of subperiosteal growth factor application on periosteal neo-chondrogenesis in osteoperiosteal bone grafts for osteochondral defect repair.

Authors:  Tobias Gotterbarm; Steffen J Breusch; Simona Berardi Vilei; Pierre Mainil-Varlet; Wiltrud Richter; Martin Jung
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  A one-step treatment for chondral and osteochondral knee defects: clinical results of a biomimetic scaffold implantation at 2 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Elizaveta Kon; Giuseppe Filardo; Francesco Perdisa; Alessandro Di Martino; Maurizio Busacca; Federica Balboni; Andrea Sessa; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 10.  Cartilage regeneration.

Authors:  Rocky S Tuan; Antonia F Chen; Brian A Klatt
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.020

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.