Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is characterized by recurrent upper airway obstruction occurring at the level of the pharynx during sleep. Although cephalometric analysis is an important method in the diagnosis of craniofacial deformities, CT and magnetic resonance imaging have been highlighted as the major imaging methods to investigate the possible causes of OSA, which, in most cases, is multifactorial. Magnetic resonance and CT both allow an excellent evaluation of the various anatomical planes of the site of obstruction, which enables better clinical assessment and surgical approach. This pictorial essay aims to describe the aspects that must be evaluated in the diagnostic imaging of patients presenting with the major predisposing factors for OSA.
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is characterized by recurrent upper airway obstruction occurring at the level of the pharynx during sleep. Although cephalometric analysis is an important method in the diagnosis of craniofacial deformities, CT and magnetic resonance imaging have been highlighted as the major imaging methods to investigate the possible causes of OSA, which, in most cases, is multifactorial. Magnetic resonance and CT both allow an excellent evaluation of the various anatomical planes of the site of obstruction, which enables better clinical assessment and surgical approach. This pictorial essay aims to describe the aspects that must be evaluated in the diagnostic imaging of patients presenting with the major predisposing factors for OSA.
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is characterized by recurrent upper airway obstruction
occurring at the level of the pharynx during sleep.(
) It is a chronic
progressive disease associated with high rates of cardiovascular morbidity.(
)The diagnosis of OSA is confirmed by polysomnography. However, imaging studies are highly
relevant supporting methods in the evaluation of patients with OSA.Cephalometric analysis, performed using X-rays, is an important method in the diagnosis of
craniofacial deformities. With this method, it is possible to measure the skull base, as
well as to determine the position of the hyoid bone, the configuration of the mandible, the
posterior pharyngeal airspace, the dimensions of the tongue, the length and thickness of
the uvula, etc. Anatomical changes in these sites can predispose patients to
OSA.(
)Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and CT have been highlighted for their ability to perform
multiplanar imaging. Because it allows a better anatomical resolution and it does not use
ionizing radiation, MRI has been used as the major imaging method for this type of
investigation.(
) This article aims to describe the major MRI and CT findings
in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with OSA.In most cases, OSA is multifactorial,(
) being the result of upper airway
collapse or narrowing occurring during sleep. In general, the greatest narrowing of the
pharyngeal air passage is seen at the level of the lower soft palate. In the protocols to
be used, axial and sagittal images of the oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal air passages
should always be included, and imaging studies should be performed as soon as possible.Midsagittal slices are of fundamental importance, because they make it possible to
characterize the airway contour, the maxillomandibular relationship (to evaluate patients
for retrognathia and micrognathia), the volume of the soft palate, the palate shapes, the
position of the hyoid bone, and the position and volume of the dorsum of the tongue. Figure 1 shows a midsagittal slice of a normal MRI scan.
Axial slices should be acquired at the levels of the nasopharynx, hypopharynx, palates,
dorsum of the tongue, and vocal cords.
Figure 1
Midsagittal slice of a magnetic resonance image from a normal subject. Note
the maxillomandibular relationship, the symmetry of the palate, and the diameter
of the air passage.
One of the most important changes that must be investigated on imaging studies in patients
with OSA is the pattern of the airway passage on the axial CT or MRI slices.
Physiologically, the pattern that is observed in normal subjects is laterolateral (Figure 2).(
) Increased soft tissue (fat,
muscle, or lymphoid tissue) volume in the oropharyngeal region can make the oropharynx
exhibit a pathological pattern anteroposteriorly (Figure
3).
Figure 2
Axial CT slice showing the physiological pattern of the air passage, the
laterolateral axis being the longest.
Figure 3
Axial CT slice at the oropharyngeal level showing the pathological pattern of
the air passage anteroposteriorly.
The conditions that can predispose to OSA include the following:Vocal cord paralysisMicrognathia and retrognathia (Figure 4)
Figure 4
Sagittal slice of a magnetic resonance image showing retrognathia (arrow),
the dorsum of the tongue in contact with the soft palate (arrowheads), and
narrowing of the nasopharyngeal air passage.
Sagittal slice of a magnetic resonance image showing a pathological pattern
of the soft palate. The patient had a high-arched palate (arrow) and increased
soft palate size (arrow heads), with consequent narrowing of the air
passage.
Deviation of the nasal septumTonsil or adenoid hypertrophy, or bothTumors or cysts in the pharyngeal region (Figure 6)
Figure 6
Sagittal reconstruction of a CT scan showing a massive polyp protruding
toward the nasopharynx and oropharynx, causing significant narrowing of the lumen
of the air passage (arrow).
Macroglossia(Figure 7)
Figure 7
Midsagittal slice of a magnetic resonance image from a patient with
macroglossia. Note that the dorsum of the tongue is in contact with the soft
palate and epiglottis (arrows). Also note the narrowing of the air passage
(arrowhead).
Hard palate deformities: high-arched palate (Figure 7)Obesity(
) (because an excess of soft tissue in the pharynx hampers the
pharyngeal air passage from remaining open)Glossoptosis (tongue ptosis has been highlighted as a cause of OSA in
children)(
-
)A low hyoid bone, ectopic thyroid, and craniofacial abnormalities (
)AcromegalyAlthough polysomnography is the method used to confirm the diagnosis of OSA,(
)
CT and especially MRI have established themselves as important supporting methods in the
clinical diagnosis, preoperative evaluation, and post-treatment follow-up of patients who
do not respond well to initial therapy. Both CT and MRI can provide an excellent evaluation
of the various anatomical planes of the site of obstruction, which enables better clinical
assessment as well as better planning for a possible surgical approach.
Authors: Lane F Donnelly; Victoria Surdulescu; Barbara A Chini; Keith A Casper; Stacy A Poe; Raouf S Amin Journal: Radiology Date: 2003-02-28 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: M Bret Abbott; Lane F Donnelly; Bernard J Dardzinski; Stacy A Poe; Barbara A Chini; Raouf S Amin Journal: Radiology Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Y Suto; T Matsuo; T Kato; I Hori; Y Inoue; S Ogawa; T Suzuki; M Yamada; Y Ohta Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 1993-02 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Jefferson Veronezi; Ana Paula Carvalho; Claudio Ricachinewsky; Anneliese Hoffmann; Danielle Yuka Kobayashi; Otavio Bejzman Piltcher; Fernando Antonio Abreu e Silva; Denis Martinez Journal: J Bras Pneumol Date: 2015 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.624